f******e
发帖数: 921 | 1 谢谢。 Some invitations said, because of your contribution in this .., I
would like to invite you to review... |
T*****2
发帖数: 473 | |
f******e
发帖数: 921 | 3 I have reviewed 50 papers for 15 journals |
f******e
发帖数: 921 | 4 could I 单列出来 judge, and also put it in the contribution? thanks |
T*****2
发帖数: 473 | |
A*T
发帖数: 4820 | 6 审稿不算contribution
建议你看看原始条款
【在 f******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。 Some invitations said, because of your contribution in this .., I
: would like to invite you to review...
|
f******e
发帖数: 921 | |
c******k
发帖数: 617 | 8 no
【在 f******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。 Some invitations said, because of your contribution in this .., I
: would like to invite you to review...
|
b*******1
发帖数: 1352 | 9 EB1 的contribution要求是original且significant。
审稿说明你有一定知名度，能旁证你之前某些contribution的significance，但本身并
不能作为contribution。
数量众多的审稿也可作为judgement的证据，但某些IO认，某些不认。
【在 f******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。 Some invitations said, because of your contribution in this .., I
: would like to invite you to review...
|
