y*p
发帖数: 1160 | 1 这说得对么?
USCIS has instituted a stricter standard in adjudicating EB.1 - Outstanding
Researcher cases. Satisfaction of the minimum regulatory requirement (2 out
of the 6 requirements) is no longer the threshold for eligibility. Not
only do you have to, at a minimum, satisfy 2 of the 6 eligibility criteria,
but you must also firmly establish that you are internationally recognized
as an outstanding researcher in the field. This second criteria is very
difficult to establish. First, they will look at how well you satisfied the
initial regulatory (6 eligibility) criteria - in which case, your case is
not very strong. Then, you would need to provide strong objective evidence
that you have been recognized internationally as an outstanding researcher
in your field. Though you have 65 non-self citations, this is not strong
evidence of your international recognition as an outstanding researcher.
From our understanding, you have the following achievements relevant to the
OR analysis:
No Major Awards or Prizes;
No notable memberships in associations requiring outstanding achievements
No published works about Peng Liu's research; - 65 Citations/references to
Peng's work;
2 time Reviewer for Journal
1 Invention Disclosure to be submitted;
10 Published Articles (and 2 Conference Presentations)
At this time, we cannot advise that you have a strong case for EB.1/OR
qualification. | w*****0
发帖数: 3349 | 2 你律师太保守了
现在多搞点review吧，过段时间再叫他看看
华人律师估计你的case就接了，关键要包装 | d*****d
发帖数: 237 | 3 ###此帖已应当事人要求删除###
【在 w*****0 的大作中提到】
: 你律师太保守了
: 现在多搞点review吧，过段时间再叫他看看
: 华人律师估计你的case就接了，关键要包装
|
|
