由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
History版 - 不自由,毋宁死
相关主题
男足女排,自杀率和外F-10万将士齐卸甲,竟无一人是男儿! (转载)喜剧的加里波第 (转载)
中美南海撞机隐秘内情震撼曝光:美国代价极惨重Glantz 老先生回信了
李密为何不堪一击蒋百里---
又憶石達開圣经是不是现存最早的书籍了?
kayaker崇拜的是希特勒的极右的国家社会主义打战最重要的是补给和后勤
关于在Korea War中美军的伤亡数字国家队四个后卫,训练多少年,都训练不出来
We shall fight on the beachesRe: [转载] 看完这篇文章时,我们都需要泪流满面,ZT
美國歷史上唯一的六星上將Re: 当年希特勒为什么那么冲动呢?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: our话题: sir话题: 先生话题: shall话题: been
进入History版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
j****e
发帖数: 12067
1
【 以下文字转载自 Dreamer 讨论区 】
发信人: joycee (买买提头号女魔头), 信区: Dreamer
标 题: 不自由,毋宁死
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jan 19 14:30:52 2011, 美东)
如果失去自由,那么不如去死。源于苏格兰裔美国人巴德里克·亨利一七七五年三
月二十三日于殖民地维吉尼亚议会演讲中的最后一句:Give me liberty or give
me death.
在弗吉尼亚州议会上的演讲
(美国)亨利1775年3月23日
主席先生:
没有人比我更钦佩刚刚在会议上发言的先生们的爱国精神与见识才能。但是,
人们常常从不同的角度来观察同一事物。因此,尽管我的观点与他们截然不同,我
还是要毫无顾忌、毫无保留地讲出自己的观点,并希望不要因此而被认为是对先生
们的不敬。此时不是讲客气话的时候,摆在各位代表面前的是国家存亡的大问题,
我认为,这是关系到享受自由还是蒙受奴役的大问题。鉴于它事关重大,我们的辩
论应该允许各抒己见。只有这样,我们才有可能搞清事物的真相,才有可能不辱于
上帝和祖国所赋予我们的伟大使命。在这种时刻,如果怕冒犯各位的尊严而缄口不
语,我将认为自己是对祖国的背叛和对此世界上任何国君都更为神圣的上帝的不忠。
主席先生,沉湎于希望的幻觉是人的天性。我们有闭目不愿正视痛苦现实的倾
向,有倾听女海妖的惑人歌声的倾向,可那是能将人化为禽兽的惑人的歌声。这难
道是在这场为获得自由而从事的艰苦卓绝的斗争中,一个聪明人所应持的态度吗?难
道我们愿意做那种对这关系到是否蒙受奴役的大问题视而不见充耳不闻的人吗?就我
个人而论,无论在精神上承受任何痛苦,我也愿意知道真理,知道最坏的情况,并
为之做好一切准备。
我只有一盏指路明灯,那就是经验之灯,除了以往的经验以外,我不知道还有
什么更好的方法来判断未来。而即要以过去的经验为依据,我倒希望知道,10年来
英国政府的所作所为中有哪一点足以证明先生们用以欣然安慰自己及各位代表的和
平希望呢?难道就是最近接受我们请愿时所流露出的阴险微笑吗?不要相信它,先生,
那是在您脚下挖的陷阱。不要让人家的亲吻把您给出卖了。请诸位自问,接受我们
请愿时的和善微笑与这如此大规模的海、陆战争准备是否相称。难道舰艇和军队是
对我们的爱护和战争调停的必要手段吗?难道为了解决争端,赢得自己的爱而诉诸武
力,我们就应该表现出如此的不情愿吗?我们不要自己欺骗自己了,先生,这些都是
战争和征服的工具,是国君采取的最后争执手段。主席先生,我要向主张和解的先
生请教,这些战争部署究竟意味着什么?如果说其目的不在于迫使我们屈服的话,那
么哪位先生能指出其动机所在?在我们这块土地上,还有哪些对手值得大不列颠征集
如此规模的海陆军队吗?不,先生,没有其他对手了。一切都是针对我们而来,而不
是针对别人。英国政府如此长久地锻造出的锁链要来桎梏我们了,我们该何以抵抗
?还要靠辩论吗?先生,我们已经辩论10年了,可辩论出什么更好的抵御措施了吗?没
有。我们已从各种角度考虑过了,但一切均是枉然。难道我们还要求救于哀告与祈
求吗?难道我们还有什么更好方法未被采用吗?勿需寻找了,先生,我恳求您,千万
不要自己欺骗自己了。我们已经做了应该做的一切,来阻止这场即已来临的战争风
暴。我们请愿过了,我们抗议过了,我们哀求过了,我们也曾拜倒在英国王的宝座
下,恳求他出面干预,制裁国会和内阁中的残暴者。可我们的请愿受到轻侮,我们
的抗议招致了新的暴力,我们的哀求被人家置之不理,我们被人家轻蔑地一脚从御
座前踢开了。事到如今,我们再也不能沉迷于虚无缥缈的和平希望之中了。希望已
不能存在!假如我们想得到自由,并拯救我们为之长期奋斗的珍贵权力的话;假如我
们不愿彻底放弃我们长期所从事的,曾经发誓不取得最后的胜利而决不放弃的光荣
斗争的话,那么,我们必须战斗!我再重复一遍,必须战斗!我们的唯一出路只有诉
诸武力,求助于战争之神。
主席先生,他们说我们的力量太单薄了,不能与如此强大凶猛的敌人抗衡。但
是,我们何时才能强大起来呢?是下周?还是明年?还是等到我们完全被缴械,家家户
户都驻守着英国士兵的时候呢?难道我们就这样仰面高卧,紧抱着那虚无缥缈的和平
幻觉不放,直到敌人把我们的手脚都束缚起来的时候,才能获得有效的防御手段吗
?先生们,如果我们能妥善利用自然之神赐予我们的有利条件,我们就不弱小。如果
我们三百万人民在自己的国土上,为神圣的自由事业而武装起来,那么任何敌人都
是无法战胜我们的。此外,先生们,我们并非孤军作战,主宰各民族命运的正义之
神,会号召朋友们为我们而战。先生们,战争的胜负不仅仅取决于力量的强弱,胜
利永远属于那些机警的、主动的、勇敢的人们。况且,我们已没有选择余地了。即
使我们那样没有骨气,想退出这场战争,也为时晚矣!我们已毫无退路,除非甘愿受
屈辱和奴役!囚禁我们的锁链已经铸就,波士顿草原上已经响起镣铐的叮当响声。战
争已不可避免--那么就让它来吧!我再重复一遍,就让它来吧!
回避现实是毫无用处的。先生们会高喊:和平!和平!但和平安在?实际上,战争
已经开始,从北方刮来的大风都会将武器的铿锵回响送进我们的耳鼓。我们的同胞
已身在疆场了,我们为什么还要站在这袖手旁观呢?先生们希望的是什么?想要达到
什么目的?生命就那么可贵?和平就那么甜美!甚至不惜以戴锁链、受奴役的代价来换
取吗?全能的上帝啊,阻止这一切吧!在这场斗争中,我不知道别人会如何行事,至
于我,不自由,毋宁死!
亨利演讲辞的英文版
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilit
ies,
of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But differe
nt
men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope
it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining
as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth
my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony.
The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For
my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or
slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the
freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive
at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and
our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear
of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards
my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which
I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song
of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise
men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed
to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears,
hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For
my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the
whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp
of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past.
And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct
of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with
which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is
it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received?
Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves
to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of
our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters
and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and
reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that
force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves,
sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments
to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array,
if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any
other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter
of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No,
sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other.
They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British
ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them?
Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years.
Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the
subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in
vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall
we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you,
sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done
to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remon
strated;
we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and
have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the minist
ry
and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have
produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disrega
rded;
and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In
vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconcil
iation.
There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean
to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been
so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle
in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves
never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained-
-
we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to
the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable
an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or
the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British
guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresol
ution
and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying
supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our
enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make
a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power
.
The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such
a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our
enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles
alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and
who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir,
is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.
Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it
is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submi
ssion
and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plain
s
of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let
it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace,
Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale
that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding
arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What
is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace
so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid
it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me,
give me liberty or give me death!
l*****s
发帖数: 2109
2
印第安人一定也是这么想的。
y****o
发帖数: 3575
3
结果如何?

【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 印第安人一定也是这么想的。
s*****j
发帖数: 6435
4
打人不要打脸.

【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 印第安人一定也是这么想的。
d****z
发帖数: 9503
5
Good Indians are dead Indians

【在 y****o 的大作中提到】
: 结果如何?
h******6
发帖数: 51
6
何为自由
1 (共1页)
进入History版参与讨论
相关主题
Re: 当年希特勒为什么那么冲动呢?kayaker崇拜的是希特勒的极右的国家社会主义
时代》周刊为啥评邓小平为1978年的年度人物?关于在Korea War中美军的伤亡数字
宋希濂谈瞿秋白被俘就义内情We shall fight on the beaches
Re: 谁能详细介绍一下这个图,中印边界美國歷史上唯一的六星上將
男足女排,自杀率和外F-10万将士齐卸甲,竟无一人是男儿! (转载)喜剧的加里波第 (转载)
中美南海撞机隐秘内情震撼曝光:美国代价极惨重Glantz 老先生回信了
李密为何不堪一击蒋百里---
又憶石達開圣经是不是现存最早的书籍了?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: our话题: sir话题: 先生话题: shall话题: been