m*****p
发帖数: 39 | 1 我用過非CIP認證的10mm和357mag，非常容易卡殼，9mm倒是沒有過。大家都用+p嗎
9mm Luger has < 34,100 psi (measured using the CIP method)
9mm Parabellum has < 35,000 psi (measured using the SAAMI method)
9mm NATO has < 36,500 psi (CIP method) and cannot use an expanding bullet
9mm +P has > 35,000 psi & < 38,500 psi (SAAMI method)
9mm +P+ has > 38,500 psi (SAAMI method)
Proofing pressure is 45,700 psi
Despite different nominal pressures (CIP vs SAAMI), the 9mm Parabellum and
Luger are virtually identical and the terms are used interchangeably. To add
to the confusion, a 9mm NATO round could also be a 9mm Parabellum and a 9mm
Luger round as long as it wasn't loaded to the NATO maximum pressure. But
generally 9mm rounds designated NATO tend to be a little hotter than normal
9mm.
CIP is predominantly the European standard and, among other differences, it
measures pressure inside the casing itself. SAAMI is predominantly the US
standard and it measures pressure inside the chamber. | d***a
发帖数: 13752 | 2 用，大多数的9mm手枪是+p rated的，包括P365这样的小手枪。
add
9mm
【在 m*****p 的大作中提到】
: 我用過非CIP認證的10mm和357mag，非常容易卡殼，9mm倒是沒有過。大家都用+p嗎
: 9mm Luger has < 34,100 psi (measured using the CIP method)
: 9mm Parabellum has < 35,000 psi (measured using the SAAMI method)
: 9mm NATO has < 36,500 psi (CIP method) and cannot use an expanding bullet
: 9mm +P has > 35,000 psi & < 38,500 psi (SAAMI method)
: 9mm +P+ has > 38,500 psi (SAAMI method)
: Proofing pressure is 45,700 psi
: Despite different nominal pressures (CIP vs SAAMI), the 9mm Parabellum and
: Luger are virtually identical and the terms are used interchangeably. To add
: to the confusion, a 9mm NATO round could also be a 9mm Parabellum and a 9mm
|
|
