o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 1 想买把carry的枪，装弹在10发以上的，glock 19应该是首选，可是有点大，FNS 9C略
微小点，带三个弹夹，其中一个是17发的，而且带夜瞄，比glock19还便宜些，觉得挺
好的。
哪位给点建议？ |
n****e
发帖数: 6292 | |
T*******y
发帖数: 560 | 3 我始终不明白什么人能忍受G26那个握把，又短又宽又棱角分明，实在想要个striker
fired无保险的塑料枪，可以上PPS M2，天壤之别 |
o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 4 glock系列中，比glock19小的，实在喜欢不起来，握把实在太短了，不舒服 |
T*******y
发帖数: 560 | 5 对，glock的枪越大，握把越长，握把细的部分就越大，glock 17还有点细脖子，
glock 19就很少了， glock 26就没有脖子，和矮大紧一样。
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: glock系列中，比glock19小的，实在喜欢不起来，握把实在太短了，不舒服
|
k****e
发帖数: 621 | 6 挺好的，跟G19感觉差不多
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: 想买把carry的枪，装弹在10发以上的，glock 19应该是首选，可是有点大，FNS 9C略
: 微小点，带三个弹夹，其中一个是17发的，而且带夜瞄，比glock19还便宜些，觉得挺
: 好的。
: 哪位给点建议？
|
p*****d
发帖数: 61 | 7 正想上来问一下的
枪店推荐FNS9C
原因：
大小carry合适
比Glock好（他的观点）
适合手大的人，Glock 19 拿得都不舒服
Trigger号称比Glock好得多，当然是没改的前提下
看来没什么人用这个，没经验了
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: 想买把carry的枪，装弹在10发以上的，glock 19应该是首选，可是有点大，FNS 9C略
: 微小点，带三个弹夹，其中一个是17发的，而且带夜瞄，比glock19还便宜些，觉得挺
: 好的。
: 哪位给点建议？
|
o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 8 同事有把FNS 9，印象很好，非常reliable。本来我也没留意FNS，查了查才知道是很牛
的公司。不过似乎新一代的手枪外形都不如老的好看，可能是用了塑料的缘故。 |
p*****d
发帖数: 61 | 9 多谢
FNS9C 好像有w/ or w/o safety options，区别差$50
听说这个公司原来不怎么在美国卖，同胞们没有很正常。一定要去试试
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: 同事有把FNS 9，印象很好，非常reliable。本来我也没留意FNS，查了查才知道是很牛
: 的公司。不过似乎新一代的手枪外形都不如老的好看，可能是用了塑料的缘故。
|
M******u
发帖数: 103 | 10 我进了一只9c，打了一千发左右感觉还不错。现在是我的carry gun，我觉得比glock好
看一些。 |
|
|
p*****d
发帖数: 61 | 11 PPS M2 单排弹夹，装弹少点到没什么，把手小点吧 |
f********s
发帖数: 75 | 12 FNS 9c carry比较大,mag release button有点小, 另外这把枪safety有点concern. 比
较看看glock 43, xds 9mm. 弹夹的话可以买大一点的备用弹夹.xds 9mm有2个safety--
grip & trigger, 而且不影响使用,有小孩的话更安全一点.
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: 想买把carry的枪，装弹在10发以上的，glock 19应该是首选，可是有点大，FNS 9C略
: 微小点，带三个弹夹，其中一个是17发的，而且带夜瞄，比glock19还便宜些，觉得挺
: 好的。
: 哪位给点建议？
|
o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 13 个人感觉safety不是特别需要，carry的枪，不打算上膛。原来想买M&P shield的，不
过考虑到现在的坏蛋都是成群作案，怕7，8发子弹不太够，所以才转而考虑FNS 9C和
glock 19的。 |
M******u
发帖数: 103 | 14 Carry的枪才需要上膛，同样的Carry的枪才不需要太多的safety，有个好的holster最
重要。
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: 个人感觉safety不是特别需要，carry的枪，不打算上膛。原来想买M&P shield的，不
: 过考虑到现在的坏蛋都是成群作案，怕7，8发子弹不太够，所以才转而考虑FNS 9C和
: glock 19的。
|
i**********s
发帖数: 528 | 15 I have. I have FNS9C FNS40. I bought FNS 9C for ccw. FNS40 is in my truck.
I have not carry FNS 9c yet. But from my experience, I like it better than
Glock. Better trigger at least I think. No ejection issue. Sights are better
. Only thing is mag release is stiff and mags are expensive. But it is 100
less than GLOCK 19 too. I will buy FNS9 instead of G17.
【在 o********c 的大作中提到】
: 想买把carry的枪，装弹在10发以上的，glock 19应该是首选，可是有点大，FNS 9C略
: 微小点，带三个弹夹，其中一个是17发的，而且带夜瞄，比glock19还便宜些，觉得挺
: 好的。
: 哪位给点建议？
|
h*******g
发帖数: 2201 | 16 FNS9C obviously is too thick, 1.35". Not nearly fit for conceal carry. You
can find many better alternatives for conceal carry.
In addition, google FNS9C shows there are some concerns with the quality and
design of the pistol. Just quote one here:
http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-wesson-m-p-pistols/472546-m-p-9c-fn-fns9c-go.html
Being very familiar with both, I would stay w/ the M&P. My reason are thus;
*Both are very decent weapons, but with prolonged firing, I have seen
striker pin damage in the FN. Not enough to put the weapon out of action,
but to me, it was a concern. It appears to be caused by poor parts
engineering to me.
*It is very hard to soften up the trigger pull on a FNS. They are stiff from
the factory, and remain that way pretty much from then on. No aftermarket
support about this problem so far, at least none I am aware of, and no easy
way to fix it.
*The magazine release system in the FNS is lacking. While the button is
ambidextrous and easy to use, the latch itself is too small for the
application. The stop on the magazines are easily damaged and prone to
allowing a magazine to fall out. Look closely and you will see what I mean.
*The FNS appears to be a mostly, if not all, MIM parts gun. While almost
every firearms manufacturer now uses lots of MIM parts in their firearms,
the FNS seems to be almost all MIM parts. Does MIM work? Yes, it does, and
FN seems to have embraced it fully. Not sure I care for that, and I have not
heard of any endurance testing of FNS pistols as of this time, nor am I
aware of any Law Enforcement agencies using FNS pistols. Of course, I might
be wrong on both of those accounts, too.
*Poor to no aftermarket support, as has been said. There is just almost
nothing out there for FN pistols as of yet. And just no resale value at all.
I also think that MSRP from FNs is too high, given the kind of pistol they
are and that is part of the reason they do not sell well.
Do I like the FNS as a basic pistol? I really do, it is a neat gun. But
while I have had several occasions to purchase an FNS, due to all that I
have mentioned, I have chosen not to do so. My close friend did purchase one
and being his shooting buddy and personal Armorer, these are the things I
have discovered in using his pistol at length.
The M&P IS a better choice, period.
As always, YMMV. Good luck. |
h*******g
发帖数: 2201 | 17 If you want carry, try HK p30sk/p2000sk, Glock43, or even smaller one, such
as Kahr pm/cm9 |
o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 18 谢谢各位提供的信息！
和dealer聊了下，FNS 9C没货，就买了glock19. 不会天天carry，也就是带孩子出门的
时候带着以防万一，所以虽然大了一点，我也不会很在意。
另一个原因是，我第一把枪是berreta 92FS，所以我打小枪感觉不太习惯（比如XDS，
glock26等）。FNS 9C网上的review看过不少，在美国的市场肯定不普及，不过我觉得
这肯定是一把好枪，不管是精度还是可靠性。装弹量12发／17发，还有自带的夜瞄也很
吸引人。
不过确实有人反映卸弹夹得需要另一只手拉出来。另外一个，配件贵是肯定的，market
support暂时好不了。 |
N**k
发帖数: 1522 | 19 据说FN的客服很差，有体验么？
better
【在 i**********s 的大作中提到】
: I have. I have FNS9C FNS40. I bought FNS 9C for ccw. FNS40 is in my truck.
: I have not carry FNS 9c yet. But from my experience, I like it better than
: Glock. Better trigger at least I think. No ejection issue. Sights are better
: . Only thing is mag release is stiff and mags are expensive. But it is 100
: less than GLOCK 19 too. I will buy FNS9 instead of G17.
|
i**********s
发帖数: 528 | 20 Never went through that. Sorry. No idea.
【在 N**k 的大作中提到】
: 据说FN的客服很差，有体验么？
:
: better
|
d*******u
发帖数: 8 | |
o********c
发帖数: 1257 | 22 我打过的枪里面，berreta最稳重，当然也是因为全金属的枪最重，握把稍大；glock19
的握把最舒服，比berreta稍微更加震手，也可能是把手上的突起的缘故；单排弹夹的
，明显不太舒服，把手短的glock26，小拇指空着，很难受。
所以迫不得已选择厚实一点的把手，牺牲便携性。当然，载弹量又是一个优势。
这东西就像车的省油和安全结实一样，无法两全，只能选择适合自己的。 |
