t******y
发帖数: 5040 | 1 我有一在硅谷的朋友，想买霰弹枪自卫。
买枪的话，请问你们有没有啥地方好推荐？
或者好的FFL DEALER可以转枪？
先谢过。
又，关于加州共和国的法律，这里没有城堡法吧？
那在家里（包括后院）自卫，打死打伤了入侵者，有没有刑事、民事责任？ |
T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 2 如果简单的话，去big5买mossberg 500的combo。网上买，这里好几个dealer可以
transfer，$35~$70 + $25 Dros
没有城堡法则，一般原则是只有在你生命受到致命威胁的时候可以，比方别人拿刀拿枪
对着你的时候。在院子里背后打枪也会有问题
刑事责任没了民事也会被纠缠 |
s****r
发帖数: 31686 | 3 35+25真的很便宜。 我现在用的那家短枪75， 长枪65
【在 T******g 的大作中提到】
: 如果简单的话，去big5买mossberg 500的combo。网上买，这里好几个dealer可以
: transfer，$35~$70 + $25 Dros
: 没有城堡法则，一般原则是只有在你生命受到致命威胁的时候可以，比方别人拿刀拿枪
: 对着你的时候。在院子里背后打枪也会有问题
: 刑事责任没了民事也会被纠缠
|
T*R
发帖数: 25894 | 4 你头像里这是谁啊....
【在 s****r 的大作中提到】
: 35+25真的很便宜。 我现在用的那家短枪75， 长枪65
|
g**********n
发帖数: 1186 | 5 凤凰台里的一个军事题材主持人。
【在 T*R 的大作中提到】
: 你头像里这是谁啊....
|
t******y
发帖数: 5040 | |
T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 7 好像有但是有些限制
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine
California California Penal Code § 198.5 sets forth that unlawful, forcible
entry into one's residence by someone not a member of the household creates
the presumption that the resident held a reasonable fear of imminent peril
of death or great bodily injury should he or she use deadly force against
the intruder. This would make the homicide justifiable under CPC § 197 [3].
CALCRIM 506 gives the instruction, "A defendant is not required to retreat.
He or she is entitled to stand his ground and defend himself and, if
reasonably necessary, to pursue an assailant until the danger ... has passed
. This is so even if safety could have been achieved by retreating." However
, it also states that "[People v. Ceballos] specifically held that
burglaries which 'do not reasonably create a fear of great bodily harm' are
not sufficient 'cause for exaction of human life.'” The court held that
because a "trap-gun" was used, the doctrine did not apply. [4] |
G****s
发帖数: 3523 | 8 有
but you could go bankrupt in civil court.
【在 t******y 的大作中提到】
: 到底有没有城堡法啊？
|
y*****n
发帖数: 11251 | 9 Then if you filed chapter 7, you are OK to defend your home?
【在 G****s 的大作中提到】
: 有
: but you could go bankrupt in civil court.
|
