Football版 - The world only wins if China and the U.S. win. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
T*******e
发帖数: 4110 | 1 这可是“伟人”厨师说的，
"My own view is that China and the U.S. have this unavoidable mutuality
where China only wins if the U.S. wins and the U.S. only wins if China wins
and the world only wins if China and the U.S. win," Cook said on the
earnings call. "I'm a big believer that the two countries together can both
win and grow the pie, not just allocate it differently," he said.
"He" is the cook. 但厨师和我的观点完全一样，当然我是个nobody。世界落后的地方
多了去了，发展的空间也多了去了，世界发展远没有到了零和的地步，中国和美国完全
可以共赢，就是未来到了零和也应该水涨船高而不是水落石出。 | w***1
发帖数: 1951 | 2 一山难容二虎啊，还是先太祖说的一切帝国主义都是纸老虎！
看看不可一世的大英帝国和德国，现在乖乖跟在美帝后面，看看美苏冷战，就可看出中
美冲突只是是早晚的问题和形式的问题。
这个世界是单极和多极是个分久必合 合久必分的轮回。
wins
both
【在 T*******e 的大作中提到】
: 这可是“伟人”厨师说的，
: "My own view is that China and the U.S. have this unavoidable mutuality
: where China only wins if the U.S. wins and the U.S. only wins if China wins
: and the world only wins if China and the U.S. win," Cook said on the
: earnings call. "I'm a big believer that the two countries together can both
: win and grow the pie, not just allocate it differently," he said.
: "He" is the cook. 但厨师和我的观点完全一样，当然我是个nobody。世界落后的地方
: 多了去了，发展的空间也多了去了，世界发展远没有到了零和的地步，中国和美国完全
: 可以共赢，就是未来到了零和也应该水涨船高而不是水落石出。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
