T*******e
发帖数: 4110 | 1 包包这转身转的真快。龙哥各种姿势的潇洒，喝茶喝咖啡抽烟，you name it. |
c******n
发帖数: 7263 | 2 今年进攻不是问题，连败那几场进攻都算不错的
【在 T*******e 的大作中提到】
: 包包这转身转的真快。龙哥各种姿势的潇洒，喝茶喝咖啡抽烟，you name it.
|
T*******e
发帖数: 4110 | 3 昨天是不是龙哥只有一个Sack。感觉没有几个pressure. 海鹰的pass rush有这么差？
昨天龙哥太潇洒了。
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: 今年进攻不是问题，连败那几场进攻都算不错的
|
c******n
发帖数: 7263 | 4 昨天那个sack是海鸟最近三场唯一一个，不是gb ol强，是海鸟rush太差
【在 T*******e 的大作中提到】
: 昨天是不是龙哥只有一个Sack。感觉没有几个pressure. 海鹰的pass rush有这么差？
: 昨天龙哥太潇洒了。
|
c***c
发帖数: 4341 | 5 各种原因，不是找借口，周四打小羊，昨天我鸟肯定没尽力
【在 T*******e 的大作中提到】
: 昨天是不是龙哥只有一个Sack。感觉没有几个pressure. 海鹰的pass rush有这么差？
: 昨天龙哥太潇洒了。
|
s*****h
发帖数: 44903 | 6 后肢后掘 原来小羊打法空也是放水。。。
【在 c***c 的大作中提到】
: 各种原因，不是找借口，周四打小羊，昨天我鸟肯定没尽力
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 7 有毛用。小羊已经养精蓄锐俩月了
【在 c***c 的大作中提到】
: 各种原因，不是找借口，周四打小羊，昨天我鸟肯定没尽力
|
c***c
发帖数: 4341 | 8 周四是小羊的SB， 渔夫的饭碗所在
【在 s*****h 的大作中提到】
: 后肢后掘 原来小羊打法空也是放水。。。
|
T*******e
发帖数: 4110 | 9 昨天海鹰基本上没有什么太多pressure。其实还是我拍的OL太差了，所以总觉得对方的
pass rusher强，包括前面对海鹰。Kam差点儿把Brady给废了, 昨天tannehill被low
hit的是支撑腿，所以咔嚓了。
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: 昨天那个sack是海鸟最近三场唯一一个，不是gb ol强，是海鸟rush太差
|
T*******e
发帖数: 4110 | 10 Earl Thomas影响是不是巨大。接手们不怕了。海鹰的腰没了，防守前端也挺不起来。
【在 c***c 的大作中提到】
: 各种原因，不是找借口，周四打小羊，昨天我鸟肯定没尽力
|
|
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 11 而且这一个sack也是垃圾时间持球太长，tackle从中间搞了一个。Kris Richard这坨翔
将熊熊一窝，pass rush全让队员胡打
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: 昨天那个sack是海鸟最近三场唯一一个，不是gb ol强，是海鸟rush太差
|
l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 12 Did you know when the Seahawks sent the first blitz in the game? On the
third play of the game when Rodgers went deep to Adams for the TD. Then they
blitz a second time, Rodgers went deep again with no hesitation, but the
ball was over threw a bit. After that, Seahawks decided to send four and
contain Rodgers. Is this the ET3 effect? I don't know. Pete said its not
Terrell problem because ball was never threw near him. Maybe it is the
other way around, he was never be around where the ball was threw.
Pete explanation was, first that was as planed as we wanted to contain
Rodgers (yeah contain someone was limping obviously). Second we were
disciplined at the LOS as we didn't want to give Rodgers the offside
free play, and that took the edge of our guys.
However the correct answer is, as Michael Bennett and many fans said,
packers were never called for holding penalties. |
c******n
发帖数: 7263 | 13 Go holders!
they
【在 l*x 的大作中提到】
: Did you know when the Seahawks sent the first blitz in the game? On the
: third play of the game when Rodgers went deep to Adams for the TD. Then they
: blitz a second time, Rodgers went deep again with no hesitation, but the
: ball was over threw a bit. After that, Seahawks decided to send four and
: contain Rodgers. Is this the ET3 effect? I don't know. Pete said its not
: Terrell problem because ball was never threw near him. Maybe it is the
: other way around, he was never be around where the ball was threw.
: Pete explanation was, first that was as planed as we wanted to contain
: Rodgers (yeah contain someone was limping obviously). Second we were
: disciplined at the LOS as we didn't want to give Rodgers the offside
|
s*****h
发帖数: 44903 | 14 我赶脚主客场差异巨大的球队
都有HOLDER的嫌疑 嘿嘿
they
【在 l*x 的大作中提到】
: Did you know when the Seahawks sent the first blitz in the game? On the
: third play of the game when Rodgers went deep to Adams for the TD. Then they
: blitz a second time, Rodgers went deep again with no hesitation, but the
: ball was over threw a bit. After that, Seahawks decided to send four and
: contain Rodgers. Is this the ET3 effect? I don't know. Pete said its not
: Terrell problem because ball was never threw near him. Maybe it is the
: other way around, he was never be around where the ball was threw.
: Pete explanation was, first that was as planed as we wanted to contain
: Rodgers (yeah contain someone was limping obviously). Second we were
: disciplined at the LOS as we didn't want to give Rodgers the offside
|
D*******e
发帖数: 12862 | 15 也可以是主场喊的声音大啊。。。
【在 s*****h 的大作中提到】
: 我赶脚主客场差异巨大的球队
: 都有HOLDER的嫌疑 嘿嘿
:
: they
|
T*******e
发帖数: 4110 | 16 Rodgers蛮tough的，mobility也是上佳，想起来去年被红鸟扔8次麻袋。这场太幸福了
，又潇洒地挺起了肚子插着手，还来个big yawn, 口袋太舒服了，舒服到困了:-)
they
【在 l*x 的大作中提到】
: Did you know when the Seahawks sent the first blitz in the game? On the
: third play of the game when Rodgers went deep to Adams for the TD. Then they
: blitz a second time, Rodgers went deep again with no hesitation, but the
: ball was over threw a bit. After that, Seahawks decided to send four and
: contain Rodgers. Is this the ET3 effect? I don't know. Pete said its not
: Terrell problem because ball was never threw near him. Maybe it is the
: other way around, he was never be around where the ball was threw.
: Pete explanation was, first that was as planed as we wanted to contain
: Rodgers (yeah contain someone was limping obviously). Second we were
: disciplined at the LOS as we didn't want to give Rodgers the offside
|
