由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Faculty版 - 问一下Science Translational Medicine投稿
相关主题
完蛋了,是不是把editor得罪了major revision是不是不太妙...
请教一个回应journal paper revison的问题有关审稿
请问editor的意思是accept with major revision还是revise& resubmitIEEE的minor revision
我是不是得罪 editor 了?What's the chance for a revised&resubmitted manuscript to be accepted?
Precision Medicine Initiative 会带来更多的工作机会么? (转载)问个journal review的问题
投稿被reviewer如此拖延这么办?Editor的意思是?
Journal Review 回复求教审文章Revise后还是没达到reviewer的要求大家会继续要求改吗
请教修改文章的问题征求建议 关于如何写review about revised manuscript for journal
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: reviewer话题: medicine话题: translational话题: science话题: paper
1 (共1页)
s**********e
发帖数: 2888
1
4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised
paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5.
reviewer说的问题似乎都是一些很细节的技术问题(reviewer 5特别负面,有几个
reviewer给的意见非常的小,就是修改一下文字),我们加实验似乎可以解决(有一个
大的问题,需要特殊实验室设备,我们没法做),但是估计至少几个月甚至半年挣扎。
小实验室一枚,所以也希望赶紧发表文章,好去申请grant。不知道大家看看编辑意思
,是应该继续和STM挣扎,还是赶紧修改文章换别人家。
u*****s
发帖数: 172
2
如果可以解决,显然跟进,修改重投
[在 sulforaphane (sulforaphane) 的大作中提到:]
:We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
:Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
:paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
:The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
:concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you
feel that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to
try to publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially
revised paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5.
:reviewer说的问题似乎都是一些很细节的技术问题(reviewer 5特别负面,有几个
:reviewer给的意见非常的小,就是修改一下文字),我们加实验似乎可以解决(有一
个大的问题,需要特殊实验室设备,我们没法做),但是估计至少几个月甚至半年挣扎。
:小实验室一枚,所以也希望赶紧发表文章,好去申请grant。不知道大家看看编辑意思
:,是应该继续和STM挣扎,还是赶紧修改文章换别人家。
s******y
发帖数: 28562
3
兄弟,这个年头,不会有什么地方不要修改的。就算你送去PLoS ONE 也一样要你修改
。并不会让你省什么时间的。
但是如果reviewer 5问了一个特别刁难的问题。我的建议是你边针对他做实验边把这个
稿子投到别的地方去。因为你投到别的地方也有可能又碰见他。

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

b**********k
发帖数: 27
4
If you feel that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would
like to try to
publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised
paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5--
this is to say, the journal has strong interest in your work-- try to fix
most of the questions from Reviewer 5, and send it back-- this is my
experience.

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

A****0
发帖数: 1367
5
这个editor显然认可了reviewer5的意见,你不正面回答他的问题,很可能修改过了也
会被锯掉。要是真的没法改,还不如试试其他杂志。

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

E*****e
发帖数: 417
6
楼上老炮们的意见很对,这年头鲜有不大修的稿子尤其是这些高大上的杂志,值得认真
推敲reviewer 5的意见补实验重投。
z*****8
发帖数: 1051
7
second

revised

【在 b**********k 的大作中提到】
: If you feel that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would
: like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised
: paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5--
: this is to say, the journal has strong interest in your work-- try to fix
: most of the questions from Reviewer 5, and send it back-- this is my
: experience.
:
: comments
: work

m******e
发帖数: 459
8
琢磨来琢磨去,费劲,直接邮件/电话联系负责你文章的editor,表达你对杂志的忠贞
不渝,顺便问下reviewer 5的问题如何回答是好
s**********e
发帖数: 2888
9
4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised
paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5.
reviewer说的问题似乎都是一些很细节的技术问题(reviewer 5特别负面,有几个
reviewer给的意见非常的小,就是修改一下文字),我们加实验似乎可以解决(有一个
大的问题,需要特殊实验室设备,我们没法做),但是估计至少几个月甚至半年挣扎。
小实验室一枚,所以也希望赶紧发表文章,好去申请grant。不知道大家看看编辑意思
,是应该继续和STM挣扎,还是赶紧修改文章换别人家。
u*****s
发帖数: 172
10
如果可以解决,显然跟进,修改重投
[在 sulforaphane (sulforaphane) 的大作中提到:]
:We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
:Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
:paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
:The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
:concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you
feel that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to
try to publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially
revised paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5.
:reviewer说的问题似乎都是一些很细节的技术问题(reviewer 5特别负面,有几个
:reviewer给的意见非常的小,就是修改一下文字),我们加实验似乎可以解决(有一
个大的问题,需要特殊实验室设备,我们没法做),但是估计至少几个月甚至半年挣扎。
:小实验室一枚,所以也希望赶紧发表文章,好去申请grant。不知道大家看看编辑意思
:,是应该继续和STM挣扎,还是赶紧修改文章换别人家。
相关主题
投稿被reviewer如此拖延这么办?major revision是不是不太妙...
Journal Review 回复求教有关审稿
请教修改文章的问题IEEE的minor revision
s******y
发帖数: 28562
11
兄弟,这个年头,不会有什么地方不要修改的。就算你送去PLoS ONE 也一样要你修改
。并不会让你省什么时间的。
但是如果reviewer 5问了一个特别刁难的问题。我的建议是你边针对他做实验边把这个
稿子投到别的地方去。因为你投到别的地方也有可能又碰见他。

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

b**********k
发帖数: 27
12
If you feel that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would
like to try to
publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised
paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5--
this is to say, the journal has strong interest in your work-- try to fix
most of the questions from Reviewer 5, and send it back-- this is my
experience.

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

A****0
发帖数: 1367
13
这个editor显然认可了reviewer5的意见,你不正面回答他的问题,很可能修改过了也
会被锯掉。要是真的没法改,还不如试试其他杂志。

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

E*****e
发帖数: 417
14
楼上老炮们的意见很对,这年头鲜有不大修的稿子尤其是这些高大上的杂志,值得认真
推敲reviewer 5的意见补实验重投。
z*****8
发帖数: 1051
15
second

revised

【在 b**********k 的大作中提到】
: If you feel that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would
: like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised
: paper that addresses the reviewer comments, especially Reviewer 5--
: this is to say, the journal has strong interest in your work-- try to fix
: most of the questions from Reviewer 5, and send it back-- this is my
: experience.
:
: comments
: work

m******e
发帖数: 459
16
琢磨来琢磨去,费劲,直接邮件/电话联系负责你文章的editor,表达你对杂志的忠贞
不渝,顺便问下reviewer 5的问题如何回答是好
b********r
发帖数: 837
17
你不如改投Nature Medicine,不行的话转到nature communications。

comments
work
feel
to
revised

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 4月份投的文章,很快被送审了,最近拿到审稿意见,五个审稿人,编辑的信是说:
: We have now received the detailed reviews of your paper (attached).
: Unfortunately they are not positive enough to support publication of the
: paper in Science Translational Medicine. We hope that you find the comments
: helpful in preparing the manuscript for submission to another journal.
: The editorial team recognizes that there was certainly interest in the work
: presented here, but there were too many unanswered questions and major
: concerns from several referees for us to proceed with the paper. If you feel
: that Science Translational Medicine is truly where you would like to try to
: publish this paper, we would be willing to consider a substantially revised

s**********e
发帖数: 2888
18
十月份重新投了,加了所有要求的实验,昨天刚拿到二审的消息。两个reviewers同意
发表,两个reviewers又提了2-3个问题,绝大问题都可以简单改改文章就可以解决,唯
一的一个实验的要求是要求提高病理切片图片的质量(似乎是很容易解决的,我们计划
让外面的service实验室帮我们做)。
考虑到reviewers都还好,有点奇怪的就是编辑给我们写的信,比较negative:
I am sorry to have to tell you that we have decided to reject the manuscript
in its current form.
The review report includes comments from the initial submission and the
current submission; we did not ask Reviewer 1 to re-review. The referees
brought up criticisms of the work as presented and required additional
experimental support. In this case, we would be willing to consider a
revised, resubmitted manuscript that addresses the remaining concerns raised
by the referees.
I must emphasize that at this stage we have NOT committed space to this
contribution. The manuscript would be considered a new submission and would
need to survive a further round of in-depth review. We may select new
reviewers for re-review if needed. Furthermore the novelty of the finding
must not be compromised in the meantime.
不知道这是一个标准的大修(major revision)信件,还是说编辑部不感兴趣?

【在 b********r 的大作中提到】
: 你不如改投Nature Medicine,不行的话转到nature communications。
:
: comments
: work
: feel
: to
: revised

d***a
发帖数: 13752
19
Patpat. 如果你们接着投,是resubmission as new, 不是major revision.

manuscript

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 十月份重新投了,加了所有要求的实验,昨天刚拿到二审的消息。两个reviewers同意
: 发表,两个reviewers又提了2-3个问题,绝大问题都可以简单改改文章就可以解决,唯
: 一的一个实验的要求是要求提高病理切片图片的质量(似乎是很容易解决的,我们计划
: 让外面的service实验室帮我们做)。
: 考虑到reviewers都还好,有点奇怪的就是编辑给我们写的信,比较negative:
: I am sorry to have to tell you that we have decided to reject the manuscript
: in its current form.
: The review report includes comments from the initial submission and the
: current submission; we did not ask Reviewer 1 to re-review. The referees
: brought up criticisms of the work as presented and required additional

b********r
发帖数: 837
20
Editor 不是强调了你要是再投回去是所有程序从头来一次吗?既然这样,为啥不试试
nature Medicine啊?万一中了比你现在的杂志管用多了,不中的话nature系列子刊众
多也可以t连review 一起ransfer省了不少时间

manuscript

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 十月份重新投了,加了所有要求的实验,昨天刚拿到二审的消息。两个reviewers同意
: 发表,两个reviewers又提了2-3个问题,绝大问题都可以简单改改文章就可以解决,唯
: 一的一个实验的要求是要求提高病理切片图片的质量(似乎是很容易解决的,我们计划
: 让外面的service实验室帮我们做)。
: 考虑到reviewers都还好,有点奇怪的就是编辑给我们写的信,比较negative:
: I am sorry to have to tell you that we have decided to reject the manuscript
: in its current form.
: The review report includes comments from the initial submission and the
: current submission; we did not ask Reviewer 1 to re-review. The referees
: brought up criticisms of the work as presented and required additional

相关主题
What's the chance for a revised&resubmitted manuscript to be accepted?审文章Revise后还是没达到reviewer的要求大家会继续要求改吗
问个journal review的问题征求建议 关于如何写review about revised manuscript for journal
Editor的意思是?[bssd] 请教:editor和 reviewer这么说稿子还有戏么
d********m
发帖数: 3662
21
赶紧换,要不找大牛写信顶你上去
话说这期cell上有一篇文章就是这样被拒了然后又被顶上去的。
j***z
发帖数: 105
22
这是很有希望了。我们上次也是这样然后再投就中了。Science系列喜欢这样,个人感
觉是减短审稿时间的一个方法。Good luck!

manuscript

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 十月份重新投了,加了所有要求的实验,昨天刚拿到二审的消息。两个reviewers同意
: 发表,两个reviewers又提了2-3个问题,绝大问题都可以简单改改文章就可以解决,唯
: 一的一个实验的要求是要求提高病理切片图片的质量(似乎是很容易解决的,我们计划
: 让外面的service实验室帮我们做)。
: 考虑到reviewers都还好,有点奇怪的就是编辑给我们写的信,比较negative:
: I am sorry to have to tell you that we have decided to reject the manuscript
: in its current form.
: The review report includes comments from the initial submission and the
: current submission; we did not ask Reviewer 1 to re-review. The referees
: brought up criticisms of the work as presented and required additional

c********b
发帖数: 363
23
应该没有太大问题,不然人家也没时间和你耗着。因为这些杂志的editor都不是一线的
scientists,所以他们必须依赖reviewer而不能自己拍板。我最近经历的一个杂志,投
两次都是rejection but encourage resubmission,也没有要求太多东西,但是editor
的decision和你这个语气也是一样。当时我一边改心里也没底。后来第三次作为new
submission送回去都没有送审直接就收了。

manuscript

【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 十月份重新投了,加了所有要求的实验,昨天刚拿到二审的消息。两个reviewers同意
: 发表,两个reviewers又提了2-3个问题,绝大问题都可以简单改改文章就可以解决,唯
: 一的一个实验的要求是要求提高病理切片图片的质量(似乎是很容易解决的,我们计划
: 让外面的service实验室帮我们做)。
: 考虑到reviewers都还好,有点奇怪的就是编辑给我们写的信,比较negative:
: I am sorry to have to tell you that we have decided to reject the manuscript
: in its current form.
: The review report includes comments from the initial submission and the
: current submission; we did not ask Reviewer 1 to re-review. The referees
: brought up criticisms of the work as presented and required additional

1 (共1页)
相关主题
征求建议 关于如何写review about revised manuscript for journalPrecision Medicine Initiative 会带来更多的工作机会么? (转载)
[bssd] 请教:editor和 reviewer这么说稿子还有戏么投稿被reviewer如此拖延这么办?
Reject-but-allow-resubmission-as new paper?Journal Review 回复求教
[请教] 这种情况,文章被接收的机会大不?请教修改文章的问题
完蛋了,是不是把editor得罪了major revision是不是不太妙...
请教一个回应journal paper revison的问题有关审稿
请问editor的意思是accept with major revision还是revise& resubmitIEEE的minor revision
我是不是得罪 editor 了?What's the chance for a revised&resubmitted manuscript to be accepted?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: reviewer话题: medicine话题: translational话题: science话题: paper