由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Faculty版 - NIH要和foundation合作资助unfunded proposal
相关主题
grant能一搞多投么?福兮?祸兮?千老必看 (转载)
最近的nih申请质量怎么这么差现在是不是基本拿了K99的才有机会找教职了?
听说RO1中了后,可以hold住一段时间不启动。系里改了tenure requirement,问一下何为private organization?
有谁了解Whitehall Foundation的grant吗可以要求NIH推迟项目的start day
nih grant申请可以同时投多个所吗NSF Proposal
拿到NIH R01后申请NSF的问题grant 被同胞无理据了,太郁闷了。
请教NIH 的R21和R03unfunded grant
理科PhD的困境,包括千老和老板NSF grant
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: onpar话题: research话题: nih话题: funding话题: biomedical
进入Faculty版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b*****d
发帖数: 61690
1
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/331/331ed3
Funding unfunded NIH research applications
The Biomedical Research Funding Enterprise Provides The Infrastructure that
leads to new medical products that impact global health. Throughout history,
the long and successful tradition in the United States of investing in
biomedical research involves funding support by government, nonprofit
biomedical foundations, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and
other private funds. However, even with the current increased budgets to the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Science Foundation (NSF),
and other government funding agencies, biomedical research is under
continual budgetary pressures. As the world’s largest government biomedical
research funding agency, in 2015 the NIH reviewed 69,973 applications and
funded 14,457, for an average funding rate of 20.7% http://scim.ag/fundrate15.
Private biomedical foundations funded $4.30 billion in biomedical research
in 2012 (latest data available), a slight decrease from the $4.46 billion
invested in 2008 http://scim.ag/privatefunds12. Likewise, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) member companies funded $51.2 billion in research and development in 2014, a $400 million decrease from 2013 http://scim.ag/PhRMA14. U.S. government research funding declined from 57% (2004) to 50% (2012) of the global total, as did that of U.S. companies (50 to 41%), with the total U.S. (public plus private) share of global research funding declining from 57 to 44% (1).
Clearly, there is a surplus of high-quality applications that merit funding
through alternate sources. To boost funding of promising biomedical research
, Leidos—a national security, health, and engineering solutions company—in
partnership with the NIH and patient advocacy organizations, is now
supporting a new funding paradigm, called OnPAR (Online Partnership to
Accelerate Research): a public-private partnership that seeks to provide a
second funding opportunity for unfunded NIH research applications http://onpar.leidosweb.com/onpar/. OnPAR will seek to match investigators’ research applications to the specific research and development needs of nongovernment sources of funding.
How will it work? Biomedical research applications will still undergo the
rigorous NIH peer-review processes. Once applicants have received their NIH
funding notification, those that are unfunded and have scored within the
30th percentile (or scored well in programs that do not provide percentiles)
will be invited to participate in the OnPAR review and funding process.
These applicants will first be asked to submit their NIH-submitted public
abstract through the OnPAR website. Abstracts will be reviewed and provided
to OnPAR funding members when they align with the organization’s research
priority areas. Applicants selected by OnPAR funding members will then be
asked to upload their full NIH application, scores, percentile, and summary
statements. NIH will not provide any application material to OnPAR. Each
funding organization member will review their chosen applications, may
select some for funding consideration, and will negotiate final terms with
applicants.
Research projects will be considered and funded by OnPAR funding
organization members based on their specific research priority areas and
requirements, as described on the OnPAR website and at each respective
member’s website. For the pilot project, funding organization members were
selected to span different disease areas and based on varied foundation
sizes, as well as their interest in and potential to fund using this novel
approach. The organizations and their respective missions are:
• Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation: To coordinate and
support research that generates translatable concepts for private industry
and the NIH to advance into clinical practice.
• Breast Cancer Research Foundation: To prevent and cure breast cancer
by advancing the world’s most promising research.
• Children’s Tumor Foundation: Drive research, increase knowledge,
and advance care for the neurofibromatosis community.
• JDRF (previously Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation):
Accelerating life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat type 1
diabetes and its complications.
• Melanoma Research Alliance: To end suffering and death due to
melanoma by collaborating with all stakeholders to accelerate powerful
research, advance cures for all patients, and prevent more melanomas.
• National Alopecia Areata Foundation: To find a cure or acceptable
treatment for alopecia areata, support those with the disease, and educate
the public about the disease.
• Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy: To end Duchenne muscular
dystrophy by accelerating research, raising voices in Washington, DC,
demanding optimal care for all people with DMD; and educating the global
community.
OnPAR currently consists of the partnership between Leidos and NIH. For this
partnership, NIH will support the program by making eligible OnPAR
investigators aware of this alternative funding pathway, and Leidos will
develop the OnPAR processes and website and manage the program. Applicants
may submit projects to OnPAR even if they do not fall within the foundations
named above, as more members will be joining OnPAR. NIH will not share
application materials directly with OnPAR; instead, applicants will submit
directly to OnPAR according to the two-step submission process. There is no
requirement to rewrite the NIH proposal, and OnPAR will only accept the full
application that was submitted to NIH and the respective summary statement.
There is no target to fund a specific dollar amount, number of projects, or
type of grant. Each member organization, at its own discretion, will fund
projects that align with their mission pending availability of funds.
Should this particular public-private partnership be successful, Leidos
envisions expanding the partnerships within the United States and globally,
to fund promising research projects that are top performers, but not funded
through traditional government grant mechanisms. Leidos has had preliminary
conversations with other government funding agencies that have a surplus of
excellent research proposals that they cannot fund, and it will invite
additional organizations to join OnPAR later in 2016, including U.S. and
international government funding bodies. In addition, OnPAR is currently in
discussions to include other private biomedical research foundations,
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and private funders, such as
venture capital funds and private family foundations. OnPAR will eventually
create a community of funders that can work together to advance biomedical
research. Selected projects will follow the benchmarks of the funder and
will be evaluated according to each member’s guidelines.
Federal funding for biomedical research in the United States has fueled
discoveries that have advanced our understanding of human disease, led to
novel and effective diagnostic tools and therapies, and made our research
enterprise an international paragon. OnPAR will provide access to a global
spectrum of research projects from early discovery to translational and
clinical research and to the high-risk, high-reward space that may just miss
the cut-off level at federal funding agencies. The OnPAR pilot started this
month and will include two cycles: applications submitted between May and
September 2015 and applications submitted between September 2015 and January
2016. The number of applications that are funded by OnPAR members will
determine the level of success of this program. OnPAR is providing an
alternative paradigm to keep research moving forward for the betterment of
families and communities, at home and globally, and we look forward to the
participation of the greater scientific community in making this a
successful funding endeavor by submitting their abstracts.
1 (共1页)
进入Faculty版参与讨论
相关主题
NSF grantnih grant申请可以同时投多个所吗
grant for international collaborations拿到NIH R01后申请NSF的问题
帮同胞grant app的技巧探讨请教NIH 的R21和R03
CV中的grant是否funded部分怎么处理?理科PhD的困境,包括千老和老板
grant能一搞多投么?福兮?祸兮?千老必看 (转载)
最近的nih申请质量怎么这么差现在是不是基本拿了K99的才有机会找教职了?
听说RO1中了后,可以hold住一段时间不启动。系里改了tenure requirement,问一下何为private organization?
有谁了解Whitehall Foundation的grant吗可以要求NIH推迟项目的start day
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: onpar话题: research话题: nih话题: funding话题: biomedical