s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 1 今天我们收到另外一个法考题发来的一个信件，说是众院的一个财政委员会已经通过的
明年的财政案里，对教育部门将大幅削减资金。加上已经实施的sequestration, 总共
削减度达到20%。
有人知道这个是怎么回事么？这个是来真的还是吓吓我们而已？如果真的削减20%,很多
实验室都要关门了吧。
mmediate action requested: Institutions are urged to use the current
congressional recess to express concern with the House Appropriations
Committee decision to cut funding for the Labor-HHS-Education subcommittee,
which includes NIH, by nearly 20 percent in FY 2014.
The House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21 formally
approved its subcommittee or 302(b) allocations for the individual FY 2014
spending bills. As expected, the committee's allocations adhere to an
overall spending cap of $967 billion as mandated under sequestration. But
the committee increased the spending cap for defense by proposing reduced
funding for domestic programs.
Particularly hard hit is the Labor-HHS-Education subcommittee, which funds
the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Labor-HHS allocation is 18.6
percent below the current year's level, after sequestration. Exact funding
levels for individual programs will not be determined until the Labor-HHS
Subcommittee and then the full Appropriations Committee mark up the FY 2014
bill. However, if all programs in the bill are reduced by 18.6 percent, this
would mean a cut of nearly $5.4 billion for NIH in FY 2014. This is on top
of the $1.7 billion cut in the current year. | b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | | P****d
发帖数: 564 | 3
Increasing defense spending at expense of domestic programs seems just a
political statement by GOP, which will not fly. However, it's worth noting
that they "adhere to an overall spending cap of $967 billion as mandated
under sequestration." If the sequestration stays in place, which is likely
given the political deadlock, the domestic spending will be further reduced
by 1.6% from the 2013 level.
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 今天我们收到另外一个法考题发来的一个信件，说是众院的一个财政委员会已经通过的
: 明年的财政案里，对教育部门将大幅削减资金。加上已经实施的sequestration, 总共
: 削减度达到20%。
: 有人知道这个是怎么回事么？这个是来真的还是吓吓我们而已？如果真的削减20%,很多
: 实验室都要关门了吧。
: mmediate action requested: Institutions are urged to use the current
: congressional recess to express concern with the House Appropriations
: Committee decision to cut funding for the Labor-HHS-Education subcommittee,
: which includes NIH, by nearly 20 percent in FY 2014.
: The House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21 formally
| M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 4 这真是僧多粥少，这样的research 还咋样干下去。 | d******u
发帖数: 238 | 5 而且还分配不公。postdoc老板两个上千万的federal grants在手，现在又拿到一个千
万的。让学生写了个NIH的，due前几小时，自己在飞机上随便改了一下，没想到几百万
又到手了。 | l********n
发帖数: 62 | 6 NIH的经费紧张是两个原因造成的（1）费用削减和（2）申请人数增加。NIH的饼并没有
太大的缩小，但是分饼的人（应该是标书的数量）逐年增加。如果一个标书的分数在2
分以上，拿到funding的可能非常小。
作为faculty，我们不能改变NIH的经费紧张现状，能做的是不停的写标书。认识到写标
书是我们的工作之一，就心安了。周围还是有不少老中陆续拿到NIH funding。
,
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 今天我们收到另外一个法考题发来的一个信件，说是众院的一个财政委员会已经通过的
: 明年的财政案里，对教育部门将大幅削减资金。加上已经实施的sequestration, 总共
: 削减度达到20%。
: 有人知道这个是怎么回事么？这个是来真的还是吓吓我们而已？如果真的削减20%,很多
: 实验室都要关门了吧。
: mmediate action requested: Institutions are urged to use the current
: congressional recess to express concern with the House Appropriations
: Committee decision to cut funding for the Labor-HHS-Education subcommittee,
: which includes NIH, by nearly 20 percent in FY 2014.
: The House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21 formally
|
|
