L******t
发帖数: 1985 | 1 本来觉得L2MP挺有前途的，不管是FabricPath还是TRILL。但现在VXLAN好像很热，大家
都在支持，这个应该没有vendor lock-in的concern。所以又有点不看好L2MP了。谁能
给分析一下？ |
z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 2 这俩没有冲突吧？一个是解决L2 CONVERGENCE加ECMP加MAC SCALABILITY，另外一个解
决VLAN SCALABILITY
【在 L******t 的大作中提到】
: 本来觉得L2MP挺有前途的，不管是FabricPath还是TRILL。但现在VXLAN好像很热，大家
: 都在支持，这个应该没有vendor lock-in的concern。所以又有点不看好L2MP了。谁能
: 给分析一下？
|
L******t
发帖数: 1985 | 3 The main reason to use L2 DCN is because of VM mobility. Now with VXLAN, VM
mobility is supported as well, but this time over L3 DCN. In L3 DCN,
multipath is no longer a problem. And VXLAN can also fix the MAC scalability
issue in similar way as FabricPath. And VXLAN is even better because it
improves vlan scalability.
So in my understanding VXLAN makes FabricPath/TRILL much less appealing than
before.
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: 这俩没有冲突吧？一个是解决L2 CONVERGENCE加ECMP加MAC SCALABILITY，另外一个解
: 决VLAN SCALABILITY
|
z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 4 VxLAN is for intra DC, not inter DC
VM
scalability
than
【在 L******t 的大作中提到】
: The main reason to use L2 DCN is because of VM mobility. Now with VXLAN, VM
: mobility is supported as well, but this time over L3 DCN. In L3 DCN,
: multipath is no longer a problem. And VXLAN can also fix the MAC scalability
: issue in similar way as FabricPath. And VXLAN is even better because it
: improves vlan scalability.
: So in my understanding VXLAN makes FabricPath/TRILL much less appealing than
: before.
|
L******t
发帖数: 1985 | 5 So is FabricPath/TRILL, right?
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: VxLAN is for intra DC, not inter DC
:
: VM
: scalability
: than
|
