由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
EB23版 - USCIS被批,140 EAD可能还有微弱的希望
相关主题
485 pending3年,现在换工作有问题吗?H1-B 换雇主怎么办?offer接不接?急,在线等
RFE (EVL)接到 RFE Email
RFE里这句话啥意思?GC approved after RFE
USCIS Message: Business-Focused Immigration Enhancements, 3如果H1B超过6年,用H1B和EAD换工作有区别吗?
USCIS关于3月19日那个电话听取意见的,发了个新messagequestion : new job with EAD but no GC
拿到绿卡换工作 (转载)180天后换工作不告诉移民局,没问题吗?
Meeting with Ombudsman @ Senators Office(zz)急: Laid Off and RFE
【EB3 2015年二月第31绿】TSC EB3 二月报绿 (附timeline)急急:用EAD换工作的几个问题
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: uscis话题: ac21话题: ombudsman话题: ead话题: rfe
进入EB23版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
A****Z
发帖数: 694
1
DHS Ombudsman年报出来了,把USCIS阳奉阴违,欺上瞒下骂了个狗血淋头。
参见
ttps://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISOMB%20Annual%20Report
%202016.pdf
从第46页开始
USCIS顶头上司DHS的观点是:
1. I-140 beneficiary应该要有合法身份。要不然,让一大批等排期的人蹲移民监,有
违AC21以及大统领的法律文本和讲话精神。State Department发布了第二排期,但是避
而不见。但是没有具体提到140 EAD,只是说道要承认I-140 beneficiary的"legal
standing"。
2. EAD拖拖拉拉,发得太慢,USCIS居然还不承认,然后借口“国家安全”为由,想要
在新的法规中取消90-day的deadline
3. 发RFE犹如浪漫诗人,想发就发,劳民伤财
大家觉得Ombudsman只是打打嘴炮,还是真的对USCIS有约束力?
摘要如下:
关于I-140:
USCIS has still not changed its position
that foreign worker beneficiaries lack legal standing in
the petition process despite mounting case law to the
contrary. USCIS must reconsider its position on Form
I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker employee
standing and make a corresponding regulatory change,
fully aligning its policy to the letter and spirit of AC21 to
provide certain qualified employees greater employment
mobility while awaiting the completion of the permanent
residence process.
...
Given the significant backlog encountered by nationals
of certain countries due to per country limitations on visa
allocation, not recognizing the legal standing of Form
I-140 beneficiaries can negatively affect thousands of
intending immigrants. For example, absent legislative
action to increase annual immigrant visa allotments,
many intending immigrants already living and working
in the United States will wait a decade or longer for an
immigrant visa to become available. Absent portability,
those individuals would be required to work for the same
company, in the same position, performing the same job
duties. The agency’s position that the beneficiary has no
such standing creates a contradiction between the statutory
right of immigrant portability in AC21 and the regulatory
limitation on who is an “affected party.”349 As a result of
USCIS’ position, the agency does not notify beneficiaries of
actions that alter or extinguish their abilities to complete the
immigration process. Consequently, the beneficiaries are in
the United States for often lengthy periods, believing they
are on track to become legal permanent residents.
...
AC21 included clear Congressional intent to provide
certain qualified employees greater employment mobility
while awaiting the completion of the permanent residence
process. USCIS must reconsider its position on I-140
employee standing and make a corresponding regulatory
change, fully aligning its policy to the letter and spirit of
AC21. Separately, the Ombudsman recommends USCIS
issue additional guidance giving the phrase “same or
similar occupational classification” an expansive reading,
consistent with the plain meaning of those words as found
in INA section 204(j) as well as with Congressional intent in
enacting AC21.
关于EAD拖拉:
Thousands of EAD applicants and their employers continue
to be negatively impacted by the agency’s failure to timely
adjudicate Form I-765. The proposed regulatory changes
will not improve processing times absent allocation of
significant resources to meet processing times goals.
The Ombudsman continues to highlight EAD issues as a
systemic issue, and will monitor and engage the agency as
long as this matter remains unresolved.
关于RFE乱发:
As in previous years, the Ombudsman continues to monitor
the rates at which Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are issued
at the Vermont Service Center (VSC) and California
Service Center (CSC) in three high-skilled nonimmigrant
visa categories: H-1B (Specialty Occupation Workers),
L-1A (Intracompany Transferee Managers and Executives)
and L-1B (Specialized Knowledge Workers). The FY 2015
RFE rates for these categories continues to show disparities
between the two service centers, including fluctuations in
RFE issuance rates and unexplained divergences. The FY
2015 RFE data in other employment-based nonimmigrant
visa categories also revealed high rates of issuance in
two product lines at the VSC: O-1 (Individuals with
Extraordinary Ability or Achievement), reported at 49
percent, and P-1 (Internationally Recognized Athletes),
which increased to 65 percent. The Ombudsman will
continue to monitor and engage USCIS on issues pertaining
to the quality and frequency of RFEs.
x**8
发帖数: 1939
2
1615-AC05 final rule比较慢,据说是因为comments很多,他们必须都给看完,

20Report

【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: DHS Ombudsman年报出来了,把USCIS阳奉阴违,欺上瞒下骂了个狗血淋头。
: 参见
: ttps://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISOMB%20Annual%20Report
: %202016.pdf
: 从第46页开始
: USCIS顶头上司DHS的观点是:
: 1. I-140 beneficiary应该要有合法身份。要不然,让一大批等排期的人蹲移民监,有
: 违AC21以及大统领的法律文本和讲话精神。State Department发布了第二排期,但是避
: 而不见。但是没有具体提到140 EAD,只是说道要承认I-140 beneficiary的"legal
: standing"。

x*******3
发帖数: 637
3
最近不太平啊,各方势力都出来怒刷存在感一把。。。
k****y
发帖数: 781
4
但愿有希望
s****t
发帖数: 1049
5
上级批评下级不作为,还要专门发个报告叫苦自己说话不算?如果真想办成,就不用一
个唱红脸一个唱黑脸了
1 (共1页)
进入EB23版参与讨论
相关主题
急急:用EAD换工作的几个问题USCIS关于3月19日那个电话听取意见的,发了个新message
EB2,关于485 pending 180天之后换工作的问题-不知道是不是可以发在这里拿到绿卡换工作 (转载)
485交上去 180天Meeting with Ombudsman @ Senators Office(zz)
EB2 May 2009排期【EB3 2015年二月第31绿】TSC EB3 二月报绿 (附timeline)
485 pending3年,现在换工作有问题吗?H1-B 换雇主怎么办?offer接不接?急,在线等
RFE (EVL)接到 RFE Email
RFE里这句话啥意思?GC approved after RFE
USCIS Message: Business-Focused Immigration Enhancements, 3如果H1B超过6年,用H1B和EAD换工作有区别吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: uscis话题: ac21话题: ombudsman话题: ead话题: rfe