f****a
发帖数: 647 | 1 The following article is cited from:
https://www.numbersusa.com/news/former-uscis-official-warns-executive-
amnesty-will-overwhelm-agency
Former deputy ombudsman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS
), Luke Bellocchi, testified before the Senate Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee on how President Obama's plan to grant
amnesty and work permits to millions of illegal aliens would affect the
agency. Bellocci testified that it's "hard to imagine" the agency could
handle the surge in new applications created by President Obama's executive
actions.
Bellocchi describe the process as being based primarily on paper
applications and postal mail and that USCIS would most likely have to divert
"massive resources" from other immigration applications to process the
expected 4.5 million applications that will be arriving in the coming months.
"The administration has informed this committee that it plans to hire 1,000
new workers" to process the applications, Bellocchi said, but "questions
immediately surface whether this number will be sufficient without creating
extreme backlogs."
He indicated that the new workers would have to process and adjudicate 4,500
applications each during the six-month target period.
"Including weekends, that would mean 25 to 27 applications per day for 1,000
adjudicators." |
f****a
发帖数: 647 | 2 Will all EBs (123) slow down significantly because of the DACA? |
b******e
发帖数: 3348 | 3 I think EB-1 will be ok for priority process, but eb2-3 will be delayed for
sure.
【在 f****a 的大作中提到】
: Will all EBs (123) slow down significantly because of the DACA?
|
z****d
发帖数: 1761 | |
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 5 They already did this once with DACA in 2012. Did it "overwhelm the agency"
then? |
a*0
发帖数: 1029 | 6 说是当时daca开始时有些类别的处理时间从5个月变成了15个月。
"
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: They already did this once with DACA in 2012. Did it "overwhelm the agency"
: then?
|
f****a
发帖数: 647 | 7 starting on 18th of feb
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: in the coming month?
|
w******y
发帖数: 291 | 8 那就是说vb 又不会前进了？ 为啥他们有优先权呐
【在 f****a 的大作中提到】
: starting on 18th of feb
|
x*****u
发帖数: 776 | 9 IRS offers extra tax refunds to illegal immigrants granted amnesty by Obama,
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/3/irs-offers-extra-tax-refunds-to-illegal-immigrants/
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY?! FUCK OBAMA! |
s********c
发帖数: 4152 | 10 co-fuck
Obama,
【在 x*****u 的大作中提到】
: IRS offers extra tax refunds to illegal immigrants granted amnesty by Obama,
: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/3/irs-offers-extra-tax-refunds-to-illegal-immigrants/
: WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY?! FUCK OBAMA!
|
|
|
w******y
发帖数: 291 | 11 他们交过tax吗，怎么会有refund。搞不懂。
Obama,
【在 x*****u 的大作中提到】
: IRS offers extra tax refunds to illegal immigrants granted amnesty by Obama,
: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/3/irs-offers-extra-tax-refunds-to-illegal-immigrants/
: WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY?! FUCK OBAMA!
|
s*******n
发帖数: 4402 | 12 假如博士收入如果不如中学生，怪谁呢？ 欢迎来到真实世界。
Obama,
【在 x*****u 的大作中提到】
: IRS offers extra tax refunds to illegal immigrants granted amnesty by Obama,
: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/3/irs-offers-extra-tax-refunds-to-illegal-immigrants/
: WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY?! FUCK OBAMA!
|
s*******n
发帖数: 4402 | 13 那你应该问问自己为啥有优先权，世道变了，就像以前文革时候有钱人是黑五类，农民
工人红彤彤，出生好；后来搞市场经济了，结果大家都知道。
凡是不明白的，就像现在一个农民工人在问，凭什么有钱人有优先权？有优先权是因为
有利益，大大的利益。
合法移民老中烙印一共就算5万人，5万块钱的利益；
非法移民1100万，1100万块钱的利益；
选哪一个？
【在 w******y 的大作中提到】
: 那就是说vb 又不会前进了？ 为啥他们有优先权呐
|
l*******n
发帖数: 8388 | 14 opposite。如果uscis不批EB23 case，那奥本只有进的更多。因为他看到的demand和
visa usage停滞。
【在 w******y 的大作中提到】
: 那就是说vb 又不会前进了？ 为啥他们有优先权呐
|
w******y
发帖数: 291 | 15 前进多也没有用吧，人手不够，批不了。剩下的visa 不知怎么弄，不会又给烙印了吧。
【在 l*******n 的大作中提到】
: opposite。如果uscis不批EB23 case，那奥本只有进的更多。因为他看到的demand和
: visa usage停滞。
|
w******y
发帖数: 291 | 16 利益不是那么简单的。当年中国穷的裤子都没了还是坚持搞原子弹。只能讲美国有偏好
而已。
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: 那你应该问问自己为啥有优先权，世道变了，就像以前文革时候有钱人是黑五类，农民
: 工人红彤彤，出生好；后来搞市场经济了，结果大家都知道。
: 凡是不明白的，就像现在一个农民工人在问，凭什么有钱人有优先权？有优先权是因为
: 有利益，大大的利益。
: 合法移民老中烙印一共就算5万人，5万块钱的利益；
: 非法移民1100万，1100万块钱的利益；
: 选哪一个？
|
s********c
发帖数: 4152 | |
s*******n
发帖数: 4402 | 18 但是我们这些来美国合法EB23是最认同美国的体制优越的，所以才为之努力奋斗的不是
么？也许真的是太好了，学生不能打工，H4也不能打工，各种限制，最后门槛弄得太高
适得其反，逆向选择了。
【在 w******y 的大作中提到】
: 利益不是那么简单的。当年中国穷的裤子都没了还是坚持搞原子弹。只能讲美国有偏好
: 而已。
|
