m*******l
发帖数: 12782 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goodbug (好虫) 于 (Wed Oct 12 15:09:58 2011, 美东) 提到:
2007 didn't hurt the majority of EB2C, it's those who missed the
boat got hurt, and it's their own fault pretty much.
2007/7 didn't delay the green card, it only makes the submission of
485 early, which was a good thing for those waiting. You think if
it's not current at that time, they'd get GC earlier? Think again.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Foxman (今狐冲) 于 (Wed Oct 12 15:19:29 2011, 美东) 提到:
Wrong, EB2C are the biggest victims of 2007/7.
The only effects of 放水，is to save people with weak cases.
Without 防水, tons of ICC EB2I would have already been fired during 2008 -
2009. Now they have survived the crisis with EAD and AP, and they are eating
up the visa numbers which could have been assigned to EB2Cs.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goodbug (好虫) 于 (Wed Oct 12 15:36:11 2011, 美东) 提到:
Wrong, if they got fired and they didn't get another job with 485 status.
They were not legal to stay in the country either. And if they do
they'll get trouble in getting 485 approved.
eating
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
bearJhonson (八棵七七葚) 于 (Wed Oct 12 15:56:59 2011, 美东) 提到:
wrong, if no 2007/7, there is not so many EBI in line who supposed
returning India due to H1B expired,
2007 didn't hurt the majority of EB2C, it's those who missed the
boat got hurt, and it's their own fault pretty much.
2007/7 didn't delay the green card, it only makes the submission of
485 early, which was a good thing for those waiting. You think if
it's not current at that time, they'd get GC earlier? Think again.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goodbug (好虫) 于 (Wed Oct 12 16:02:22 2011, 美东) 提到:
Are you retarded? They can extend H1B for another 3 years as long
as they have job and 140 passed or submitted for over a year. And
if they don't keep job, they are illegal with or without 485.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Foxman (今狐冲) 于 (Wed Oct 12 16:42:58 2011, 美东) 提到:
Obviously, you don't understand eb2 immigration business at all.
Theoretically, yes, you have to leave without a job. In reality. you can
simply stay if no RFE. Moreover, you will have the time to find another job
after being fired and relink to your old PD.
But I don't think you are retarded, just ignorant, or worse, with your own
little hidden agenda.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goodbug (好虫) 于 (Wed Oct 12 16:49:12 2011, 美东) 提到:
Remember how people get move to F category and get back?
You think that'll make a big difference? Think again.
I have a PD of 2010/12, I couldn't care less 07/07 happened or
not.
job
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Foxman (今狐冲) 于 (Wed Oct 12 16:53:43 2011, 美东) 提到:
You still don't have a clue what we are talking about, do you?
If your submit your I-485 for 180 days, you can change employer. Even you
got fired, if there were no RFEs (odds are very small), you can even go back
to India / China and wait for your GC! That's how a lot of fraud ICC EBIs
survived 2008!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goodbug (好虫) 于 (Wed Oct 12 17:40:07 2011, 美东) 提到:
Now you are talking about illegal act, and you have no
data to back it up. And I wonder if they went to India,
how did they get admitted once AP expires, it's good for
one year and the wait is about 4.
It's difficult to believe they don't do anything in 4 years.
And if they just stay put, they risk 140 revoke, RFE etc.
Most sane people will just transfer to F1/F2/H4。We saw
a good share of fellow Chinese in those years and I didn't
know any of them getting GC that way.
back
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Foxman (今狐冲) 于 (Thu Oct 13 12:22:49 2011, 美东) 提到:
Your ignorance does not justify what you say. Many people who lost their
jobs after 485 submission got GCs. You said "Most sane people will just
transfer to F1/F2/H4" -- where did you get that bullshit? If some one has
submitted 485 and has EAD in hands and got fired, he will be INSANE to
transfer to F1/F2 if he doesn't have other backup plan (like spouse GC).
Sane people would look for a new job -- and with EAD and ICC, that's not
very difficult. |
|
