v***e
发帖数: 25 | 1 我试了试用vc.net做web service和windows service,觉得真的很好用。
我看将来Java是没什么戏唱了。
还是不大懂com+和serviced component。
先把MCAD考下来。。。 |
st
发帖数: 1685 | 2 VS.net or VS.net 2003?
【在 v***e 的大作中提到】
: 我试了试用vc.net做web service和windows service,觉得真的很好用。
: 我看将来Java是没什么戏唱了。
: 还是不大懂com+和serviced component。
: 先把MCAD考下来。。。
|
v***e
发帖数: 25 | 3 VS .net 2002
【在 st 的大作中提到】
: VS.net or VS.net 2003?
|
j**i
发帖数: 419 | 4
people said that vc.net is kindly from vc, and C# is what like java, right?
【在 v***e 的大作中提到】
: VS .net 2002
|
v***e
发帖数: 25 | 5
I am not from vs background so I don't know the answer for the first one,
but vs .net IDE is definetly much better than those crappy Java IDE's.
Yes, C# is very much like Java. It's like an improved version of Java for
MS environment.
【在 j**i 的大作中提到】
:
: people said that vc.net is kindly from vc, and C# is what like java, right?
|
j**i
发帖数: 419 | 6
why take MCAD instead of MSCD.net neh?
MCAD more simple ?
useful ?
right?
【在 v***e 的大作中提到】
:
: I am not from vs background so I don't know the answer for the first one,
: but vs .net IDE is definetly much better than those crappy Java IDE's.
: Yes, C# is very much like Java. It's like an improved version of Java for
: MS environment.
:
|
v***e
发帖数: 25 | 7
3 MCAD tests can be used toward MSCD.
I don't know if the 2 more MSCD tests would be more difficult or not,
but I think the first 3 are more useful for developers.
【在 j**i 的大作中提到】
:
: why take MCAD instead of MSCD.net neh?
: MCAD more simple ?
: useful ?
: right?
|
