s******d
发帖数: 323 | 1 Can anybody help me on this? Thanks, | j***h
发帖数: 4412 | 2 ft, IT IS TOO SIMPLE! YOU SHOULD SPEND MORE TIME IN PREPARING YOU PE TEST.
Refer to IBC 2006 1605.2.1, for LRFD (strength) design, use EQ 16-6 for
overturning and uplift:
0.9D+1.6W+1.6H
【在 s******d 的大作中提到】
: Can anybody help me on this? Thanks,
| s******d
发帖数: 323 | 3 Thanks so much. I am not in structural field but will need to take it for
morning section.
Just discussed with the coworker, the Ra is actually pointing down to resist
the overturning.
【在 j***h 的大作中提到】
: ft, IT IS TOO SIMPLE! YOU SHOULD SPEND MORE TIME IN PREPARING YOU PE TEST.
: Refer to IBC 2006 1605.2.1, for LRFD (strength) design, use EQ 16-6 for
: overturning and uplift:
: 0.9D+1.6W+1.6H
| Z**X
发帖数: 366 | 4 all your calc is correct except that you want to minimize Ra instead of
maximizing it...
(Ra, as the reaction, does point upward; Ra=0 indicates the threshold of
overturning/uplift taking place.)
BTW, where did your coworker graduate? hoho | s****l
发帖数: 73 | 5 Where did it say to use EQ 16-6 for overturning and uplift?
No need to consider 16-4 which will result in greater design force?
I'm not structure either but would like to know.
Thank you! |
|
