n******r
发帖数: 58 | 1 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
how well it can marshal the key ingredients of economic and societal success.
In the 20th Century, the key ingredients were labor and capital.
In the 21st Century, the key ingredients will be ideas and energy.
Ideas will be critical because manufacturing has been commoditized. That
means that anyone can make anything. The only thing that distinguishes
someone today is if that person or organization has new ideas and
innovations. We need to create a better mousetrap every week. We need to do
something different and unique.
Energy will be critical simply because everybody is growing quickly and
everyone needs a supply of energy. Countries that have figured out the
energy puzzle are going to do better and better.
So who’s better suited for this new world?
In an odd way, China is best suited for the 20th Century. They have cheap
labor and huge amounts of capital coming in. They can make whatever you want
them to make. But they haven’t yet been able to move up the value chain.
They haven’t been able to generate the big, new ideas.
Like the U.S., China also struggles with the issue of energy. China is a
consumer, not a producer of energy.
But they are quickly getting very smart on the energy front. They are
becoming the global leaders of clean tech - whether it is solar or wind.
They are also aggressively trying to move up the value chain. They are
laying the foundations to compete in the 21st Century. They are building a
great university system and they are working to get research labs in place.
In America’s case, we have all the ingredients to succeed in the 21st
Century. We have the most innovative companies in the world such as Facebook
, Apple and Google. We have the best universities in the world. We have a
nexus between universities and research-oriented companies. We have the most
dynamic capital markets in the world. We have an incredibly flexible,
diverse society, which is also very much a part of our inherent societal
innovation and dynamism.
But what we don’t have is a political system that can harness all of this
and execute.
You see this with regard to energy policy. America has no energy policy and
hasn’t had one for thirty years. It’s not just that. We also don’t have
an immigration policy. We don’t have a policy toward jobs and growth. We
don’t have a policy toward the budget deficit.
Instead, we have an absurd political paralysis in Washington where everyone
is more concerned with scoring points and maintaining their viability with
their most extreme members rather than just coming together and solving
problems.
There used to be a model in which you became famous as a lawmaker by making
deals - by reaching out to the other side and doing some compromising, which
you have to do because not everyone agrees with you, and moving the issue
forward. Now the way you get famous and powerful in Congress is by not
making a deal, by being a deal breaker rather than a deal maker.
You can see this in the Republican Party right now where the energy is all
in saying “No, there’s no deal we could possibly accept.”
If “No” is where we end up as a country, we could have all the innovation
and ideas and dynamism in the world and we’d still will have a society that
is crumbling.
Look at California as an example. California has Silicon Valley and
Hollywood. It has incredible private sector talent and creativity.
But after a while if every road is crumbling, every state university
collapsing and every educational institution under-funded, people will no
longer want to come there. They will no longer think that it is the place
where they can make their American dream come true. In this case, having
Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg there will probably not be enough. |
m********c
发帖数: 13337 | 2 搞不了犹太人，什么制度都完蛋。
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
M******s
发帖数: 1772 | 3 美国人开始有忧患意识，而且具有批判精神，这个就足够中国人对付的，更不用说人家
的底子还厚了。 |
c******2
发帖数: 3849 | |
r***k
发帖数: 13586 | 5 中国人不是没有批判精神，而是敢批判的都被当局扼杀了。
【在 M******s 的大作中提到】
: 美国人开始有忧患意识，而且具有批判精神，这个就足够中国人对付的，更不用说人家
: 的底子还厚了。
|
b******5
发帖数: 1415 | 6 中国媒体和美国媒体有一个共同点：都喜欢说美国不行了 |
z******9
发帖数: 1644 | 7 中国媒体和美国媒体有一个不同点：中国媒体基本上喜欢说自己行，而且总喜欢拉个老
外来作证。而且几乎所有行的源头在于TG的英明领导；美国媒体基本上喜欢说自己不行
，也不会在街上去扯个老外来作证。而且几乎所有不行的源头在于当前执政的民主党或
者共和党。 |
I******k
发帖数: 378 | 8 看看同性恋史还要进中小学就知道了，在美国只有声音大管用
not
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
w***s
发帖数: 4394 | 9 看到这个了么？
×××××××××
网易网友评价通稿“奥巴马会见达赖喇嘛”通过审核zz
通过审核的评论是————强烈要求中央会见萨达姆，拉登
×××××××××
中国觉得自己制度很牛，对自己的敌人却都毫无办法。看着美国的敌人被美国一个个灭
掉。美国觉得自己的制度不行？要阳痿的制度才是好制度？？
not
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
p*****i
发帖数: 739 | 10 老美有老美的问题，中国有中国问题，档次和程度不一样。中国做好自己的事情，照顾
好自己人民，保护好自己领土是第一大事。至于其他国家，自有其他的其他一些国家对
付。
not
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
|
|
O*******k
发帖数: 901 | 11 还是中朝的制度好啊，在怎么饿死人，都宇宙第一的，关键还没人反，这可是全人类最
优秀的制度阿
not
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
s******r
发帖数: 655 | |
y*****n
发帖数: 11251 | 13 每个制度都有不行的那天。中国的制度35年前就不行了，到现在每人都同意要改革。
not
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
S*********r
发帖数: 42 | 14 美国是新闻自由的社会。什么样的观点的人都有，都可以发出自己的声音。 |
w********t
发帖数: 12853 | 15 美国天天都在说自己的制度这里不行,那里不行, 自己的总统这里草包, 那里笨蛋.
希望楼主多看英文新闻, 一篇不够, 容易大惊小怪.
not
【在 n******r 的大作中提到】
: 世界变了 - 轮到美国承认自己的制度不行了
: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/14/china-vs-the
: China vs. USA: Who will win the 21st Century?
: Editor's Note: The following is an edited excerpt from a transcript of
: Fareed Zakaria answering viewer questions online. Read more from Fareed
: Zakaria at TIME: China's New Parochialism
: By Fareed Zakaria, CNN
: We’re clearly moving to a Post-American world. This is a world that is not
: dominated by the United States but not dominated by anyone else yet either.
: The 21st Century is up for grabs and how the United States does depends on
|
m***y
发帖数: 14763 | 16 美国?自己?
Yeah, right. Dr. Fareed Zakaria is really their own.
Seriously, you are totally right. If Ob8, a dark-complexioned Muslim, can be
called a real American, why don't we extend the benefit of doubt to Fareed?
After all, he looks much "whiter" : )
What remains in doubt is how he got his green card. I hope it's not through
an ICC. You know, considering how we OCs hate A3 when it comes to
immigration, that will make him much less popular among us. |
n******r
发帖数: 58 | 17 很有意思，国内网站不给贴 - 批评中国落后不行，批评美国落后也不行。。。
be
Fareed?
through
【在 m***y 的大作中提到】
: 美国?自己?
: Yeah, right. Dr. Fareed Zakaria is really their own.
: Seriously, you are totally right. If Ob8, a dark-complexioned Muslim, can be
: called a real American, why don't we extend the benefit of doubt to Fareed?
: After all, he looks much "whiter" : )
: What remains in doubt is how he got his green card. I hope it's not through
: an ICC. You know, considering how we OCs hate A3 when it comes to
: immigration, that will make him much less popular among us.
|
