B*V
发帖数: 3365 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Boston 讨论区 】
发信人: bighead10 (北美渔民), 信区: Boston
标 题: SCA-5 analysis from a political junky (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 13 00:57:56 2014, 美东)
发信人: bighead10 (北美渔民), 信区: Fishing
标 题: SCA-5 analysis from a political junky (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 13 00:57:37 2014, 美东)
发信人: bighead10 (北美渔民), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: SCA-5 analysis from a political junky
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 11 09:56:18 2014, 美东)
With Democratic party lost super majority in CA Senate, SCA-5 supporters
will try to move it forward, instead to vote it again in senate. So those
politician's vague promises are simply tactics or lies.
For any people against SCA-5, they should vote for Republicans for both
Senate and Congress, the only realistic way to contain SCA-5 is to restore
political balance in CA, at the minimum is to voting down Democratic Party's
super majority.
In this regard, we not only need to continue support Peter Kuo, but also
support
other republican party candidates.
随着民主党在加利福尼亚州参议院失去绝对多数，SCA-5的支持者
会尝试向前移动，而不是在参议院再次投票。因此，那些
政治家的含糊不清的承诺仅仅是战术谎言。
Fan对SCA-5的任何人，他们应该投票支持共和党的
参议院和国会，唯一现实的方法来牵制SCA-5是恢复
在加利福尼亚州的政治平衡，在最低是否决民主党的 |
|
