CS版 - Re: 今天看了一个会议相关领域的所有paper的review |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i*******g
发帖数: 168 | 1 你毕业就达到他们境界的可能性是0。
一辈子能达到的可能性也不超过10%，努力吧。 | h****n
发帖数: 107 | 2 sensor networks? it's very hard to get a paper into sensor network
conferences, because so many people are working on it.
【在 i*******g 的大作中提到】
: 你毕业就达到他们境界的可能性是0。
: 一辈子能达到的可能性也不超过10%，努力吧。
| r**l
发帖数: 72 | 3 hehe, it is the case
1 or 2 years ago, it's quite easy
to publish a paper in sensor network;
now it's really difficult.
Just browsed this year's sensys,
half or more than half paper is from berkeley...
【在 h****n 的大作中提到】
: sensor networks? it's very hard to get a paper into sensor network
: conferences, because so many people are working on it.
| x*g
发帖数: 68 | 4 sensys is dominated by those pure system guys, they want to see real systems
running on motes. Personally, I don't think it is a very good thing. Although
working systems can bring more applications and expand the area, they severely
limit the perspectives of the research (even system research), since motes is
such a constrainted platform. Some system papers at sensys are purely playing
with motes and trying to deal with some specific limitations of mote
platforms, e.g., floppy wireless links, s
【在 r**l 的大作中提到】
: hehe, it is the case
: 1 or 2 years ago, it's quite easy
: to publish a paper in sensor network;
: now it's really difficult.
: Just browsed this year's sensys,
: half or more than half paper is from berkeley...
| r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 5 do you mean sensy04?
half paper from berkeley? must be kidding.
assume only first author affiliation is counted.
venderbilt 2
USC 3
UCLA 2
Berkeley 5
MIT 2
JHU 1
UCDavis 1
Colorado 1
Havard 1
princeton 1
UCSB 1
CMU 1
【在 r**l 的大作中提到】
: hehe, it is the case
: 1 or 2 years ago, it's quite easy
: to publish a paper in sensor network;
: now it's really difficult.
: Just browsed this year's sensys,
: half or more than half paper is from berkeley...
| r**l
发帖数: 72 | 6 I am not a sensor network researcher,
not even close...
just had a glance over it
and got this impression
your statistics is the final one :)
by the way, is sensys the best conf
in sensor network?
I'd like to exclude mobicomm b/c it's
not dedicated to sensor network research
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: do you mean sensy04?
: half paper from berkeley? must be kidding.
: assume only first author affiliation is counted.
: venderbilt 2
: USC 3
: UCLA 2
: Berkeley 5
: MIT 2
: JHU 1
: UCDavis 1
| s***e
发帖数: 1490 | 7 Should not only count the first author affiliations.
Berkeley 5
USC 3
UCLA 4
UCDavis 1
UCSB 1
hehe, too many from Cal :P
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: do you mean sensy04?
: half paper from berkeley? must be kidding.
: assume only first author affiliation is counted.
: venderbilt 2
: USC 3
: UCLA 2
: Berkeley 5
: MIT 2
: JHU 1
: UCDavis 1
| r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 8 maybe, but depends.
I always think generally counting the affiation of the corresponding author
(often the same as the first author) make more sense.
【在 s***e 的大作中提到】
: Should not only count the first author affiliations.
: Berkeley 5
: USC 3
: UCLA 4
: UCDavis 1
: UCSB 1
: hehe, too many from Cal :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
