s********e 发帖数: 124 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 EE 讨论区 】
发信人: singlelove (singlelove), 信区: EE
标 题: CE还是EE
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 2 16:50:28 2010, 美东)
各位:
跟EE 比 CE的MS 或者PHD 好找工作吗?是不是都是写代码的啊?跟CS比呢?
多谢各位 最近在考虑 |
S*******w 发帖数: 24236 | 2 cs更好找工作
【在 s********e 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 EE 讨论区 】 : 发信人: singlelove (singlelove), 信区: EE : 标 题: CE还是EE : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 2 16:50:28 2010, 美东) : 各位: : 跟EE 比 CE的MS 或者PHD 好找工作吗?是不是都是写代码的啊?跟CS比呢? : 多谢各位 最近在考虑
|
s********e 发帖数: 124 | 3 确实 不过是不是有点硬件的基础以后方便换方向啊?如果觉得代码比较枯燥的话……
【在 S*******w 的大作中提到】 : cs更好找工作
|
z****e 发帖数: 54598 | 4 if u want to change ur major or job in future
i think cs is much better than ee
since there is no need for u to master socalled 硬件基础 if u r not a
technician or engineer
【在 s********e 的大作中提到】 : 确实 不过是不是有点硬件的基础以后方便换方向啊?如果觉得代码比较枯燥的话……
|
k**********g 发帖数: 989 | 5 This is true. However, most companies know that some EE masters (depending
on the area of study) are also strong in programming, and will also accept
candidates who have done software projects.
One weakness of EE master is that there is usually no time to study the
Database course. Many CS jobs require Database knowledge (because Database
is used by every kind of businesses).
I had a BSc Computer Engineering and then a MSc Electrical Engineering (
Signal Processing).
what is 硬件基础?
These are math |
p**l 发帖数: 125 | 6 Agreed with you, as a MS EE. As a plus, some MS EE/CE probably has more
understanding in board and system level, such as embedded system (MCU,
DSP, FPGA), mechatronic system, power electronics...where C and assembly
might suffice for most of the time. Even OS/multithreadig might not be
always required.
Just my 2 cents, CS people usually have stronger background in large and
collaborative software development, while EE people has more involvement
in actual system design and implementation.
(depending
accept
the
Database
(
【在 k**********g 的大作中提到】 : This is true. However, most companies know that some EE masters (depending : on the area of study) are also strong in programming, and will also accept : candidates who have done software projects. : One weakness of EE master is that there is usually no time to study the : Database course. Many CS jobs require Database knowledge (because Database : is used by every kind of businesses). : I had a BSc Computer Engineering and then a MSc Electrical Engineering ( : Signal Processing). : what is 硬件基础? : These are math
|
D***r 发帖数: 7511 | 7 线性代数和数值计算是工科必修课,至少在国内是这样
信号与系统是电类专业必修课
【在 k**********g 的大作中提到】 : This is true. However, most companies know that some EE masters (depending : on the area of study) are also strong in programming, and will also accept : candidates who have done software projects. : One weakness of EE master is that there is usually no time to study the : Database course. Many CS jobs require Database knowledge (because Database : is used by every kind of businesses). : I had a BSc Computer Engineering and then a MSc Electrical Engineering ( : Signal Processing). : what is 硬件基础? : These are math
|
i****l 发帖数: 78 | 8 EE MS也能找CS的工作,PHD的话还是学EE好找
【在 s********e 的大作中提到】 : 确实 不过是不是有点硬件的基础以后方便换方向啊?如果觉得代码比较枯燥的话……
|
s********e 发帖数: 124 | 9 为何PHD EE好找工作?难道CS不需要PHD?
【在 i****l 的大作中提到】 : EE MS也能找CS的工作,PHD的话还是学EE好找
|
s********e 发帖数: 124 | 10 那如果是PHD的话 CS和EE是不是就更偏各自本身的东西了?比如EE就更偏硬件一些啊?
【在 p**l 的大作中提到】 : Agreed with you, as a MS EE. As a plus, some MS EE/CE probably has more : understanding in board and system level, such as embedded system (MCU, : DSP, FPGA), mechatronic system, power electronics...where C and assembly : might suffice for most of the time. Even OS/multithreadig might not be : always required. : Just my 2 cents, CS people usually have stronger background in large and : collaborative software development, while EE people has more involvement : in actual system design and implementation. : : (depending
|
p**l 发帖数: 125 | 11 我瞎说一句,有很多EE PHD做的东西蛮理论了,CS PHD也是,虽然用到的数学可能有很
大的不同。。。
【在 s********e 的大作中提到】 : 那如果是PHD的话 CS和EE是不是就更偏各自本身的东西了?比如EE就更偏硬件一些啊?
|