g******k
发帖数: 55 | 1 比如NYU的PT MBA，是不是申请难度比full time小很多？
今天跟我manager聊天，他说PT program不一定需要3年的工作经验，有一两年就可以去
试。
大家知道的说说？
多谢！ |
f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 2 go to businessweek mba website, check schools' class profile.
【在 g******k 的大作中提到】
: 比如NYU的PT MBA，是不是申请难度比full time小很多？
: 今天跟我manager聊天，他说PT program不一定需要3年的工作经验，有一两年就可以去
: 试。
: 大家知道的说说？
: 多谢！
|
C*********t
发帖数: 24 | 3 我现在在申请booth和kellogg的part time
貌似还是有难度。竞争的大多数都是老美啊。就光是essay, interview我们就比不过阿
。 |
w******x
发帖数: 2769 | 4 我现在申请USC的Part time, 难度不在于GMAT或者GPA, 而在于申请的人很多在工作的
本行都已经很牛了,这方面是多高的GMAT都补不了的 |
f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 5 did you try anderson? it is ranked number 1 by BW. btw, do NOT overestimate
your competition. good luck!
【在 w******x 的大作中提到】
: 我现在申请USC的Part time, 难度不在于GMAT或者GPA, 而在于申请的人很多在工作的
: 本行都已经很牛了,这方面是多高的GMAT都补不了的
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 6
我至少知道NYU有本科毕业刚工作几个月的，也有工作十几年的，统计上都是平均数字
，真正申请只有自己试试才知道啦
【在 g******k 的大作中提到】
: 比如NYU的PT MBA，是不是申请难度比full time小很多？
: 今天跟我manager聊天，他说PT program不一定需要3年的工作经验，有一两年就可以去
: 试。
: 大家知道的说说？
: 多谢！
|
w******x
发帖数: 2769 | 7 我在San Diego, UCLA要求全部课程都去LA上, USC的第一年在Irvine上,所以没有考虑
UCLA. 另外, UCLA的FEMBA的GMAT平均分要近700分呀
overestimate
【在 f********m 的大作中提到】
: did you try anderson? it is ranked number 1 by BW. btw, do NOT overestimate
: your competition. good luck!
|
f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 8 man, GMAT is the only thing you can improve right before application.
【在 w******x 的大作中提到】
: 我在San Diego, UCLA要求全部课程都去LA上, USC的第一年在Irvine上,所以没有考虑
: UCLA. 另外, UCLA的FEMBA的GMAT平均分要近700分呀
:
: overestimate
|
w******x
发帖数: 2769 | 9 GMAT正在努力中......
【在 f********m 的大作中提到】
: man, GMAT is the only thing you can improve right before application.
|
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 10 PT MBA at Stern is a NO NO unless tuition is fully paid by your employer.
Read businessweek's posts about Stern's PT before jump in.
【在 g******k 的大作中提到】
: 比如NYU的PT MBA，是不是申请难度比full time小很多？
: 今天跟我manager聊天，他说PT program不一定需要3年的工作经验，有一两年就可以去
: 试。
: 大家知道的说说？
: 多谢！
|
|
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 11 Those posts basically complained that PTers can't bid for interviews for
many on campus recruiting events, which is totally true.
However, there are many other ways to land a job, through connections
from people you know when attending class (tons of PTers are from NYC
based banks, funds, and consulting firms), through stern alumnus network
SWAP, and through student associations of finance, consulting,
marketing, asia business, etc -- they bring hundreds of companies on
campus for recruiting and
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: PT MBA at Stern is a NO NO unless tuition is fully paid by your employer.
: Read businessweek's posts about Stern's PT before jump in.
|
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 12 Stern PT goer? But what you said is true for any MBA program, not only Sterm
PT.
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: Those posts basically complained that PTers can't bid for interviews for
: many on campus recruiting events, which is totally true.
: However, there are many other ways to land a job, through connections
: from people you know when attending class (tons of PTers are from NYC
: based banks, funds, and consulting firms), through stern alumnus network
: SWAP, and through student associations of finance, consulting,
: marketing, asia business, etc -- they bring hundreds of companies on
: campus for recruiting and
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 13 I agree it's the same for all MBA programs. I just wanted to give a second
opinion to the claim 'stern pt is a big no no
unless the tuition is fully paid' so that those wanted to go for PT would
not get discouraged by incomplete info . Just
because a few people complained on a blog does not change the fact that
many more others benefited from it - it
can be easily seen by checking people's resume on the alumus network and
seeing their career progress before and
after the program.
Of course, if
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: Stern PT goer? But what you said is true for any MBA program, not only Sterm
: PT.
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 14 I agree it's the same for all MBA programs. I just wanted to give a second
opinion to the claim 'stern pt is a big no no
unless the tuition is fully paid' so that those wanted to go for PT would
not get discouraged by incomplete info . Just
because a few people complained on a blog does not change the fact that many
more others benefited from it - it can
be easily found out by checking people's resume on the alumus network and
their career progress before and after
the program.
Of course, if one
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: Stern PT goer? But what you said is true for any MBA program, not only Sterm
: PT.
|
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 15 then why not Zacklin PT? tuition is 1/3 that of Stern. You can also find
strong PT alum network in NYC.
many
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: I agree it's the same for all MBA programs. I just wanted to give a second
: opinion to the claim 'stern pt is a big no no
: unless the tuition is fully paid' so that those wanted to go for PT would
: not get discouraged by incomplete info . Just
: because a few people complained on a blog does not change the fact that many
: more others benefited from it - it can
: be easily found out by checking people's resume on the alumus network and
: their career progress before and after
: the program.
: Of course, if one
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 16 I guess that's a personal preference. Zicklin may be a great value if you
wanna stay in NYC, while Stern is a name recognized more widely
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: then why not Zacklin PT? tuition is 1/3 that of Stern. You can also find
: strong PT alum network in NYC.
:
: many
|
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 17 but does the education and service provided by stern to PT justify the
amount of money you pay? PTers pay 90K, the same amount tuition as the FT,
and are treated as 2nd class students at Stern.
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: I guess that's a personal preference. Zicklin may be a great value if you
: wanna stay in NYC, while Stern is a name recognized more widely
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 18 Well that is totally up to each individual's perception. I personally know a
guy who would pay $2000 for three days of heli-skiing in a heartbeat and
considers $45 an hour indoor tennis course outrageously expensive. Some
weekend classes has almost 1/4 students from Goldman -- it's not that they
can't get in the FT program, just many thought the opportunity cost of
staying full time in school is too much. If you consider the fact that most
part timers make between $100k and $200k and going to sc
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: but does the education and service provided by stern to PT justify the
: amount of money you pay? PTers pay 90K, the same amount tuition as the FT,
: and are treated as 2nd class students at Stern.
|
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 19 You argued a lot on individual variability. I assume this varibility
explains why you feel so passion about Stern PT, while many other people (
seems to be a quite notable number) felt that Stern ripped them off.
a
most
-
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: Well that is totally up to each individual's perception. I personally know a
: guy who would pay $2000 for three days of heli-skiing in a heartbeat and
: considers $45 an hour indoor tennis course outrageously expensive. Some
: weekend classes has almost 1/4 students from Goldman -- it's not that they
: can't get in the FT program, just many thought the opportunity cost of
: staying full time in school is too much. If you consider the fact that most
: part timers make between $100k and $200k and going to sc
|
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 20 You played the opportunity cost argument for Stern's benefit. I believe that
is the argument Stern used to justify treating PT students differently. You
pay tuition and fees for services (both education and career management are
services). The services should be equal no matter you are FT or PT, since
tuitions are the same.
a
most
-
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: Well that is totally up to each individual's perception. I personally know a
: guy who would pay $2000 for three days of heli-skiing in a heartbeat and
: considers $45 an hour indoor tennis course outrageously expensive. Some
: weekend classes has almost 1/4 students from Goldman -- it's not that they
: can't get in the FT program, just many thought the opportunity cost of
: staying full time in school is too much. If you consider the fact that most
: part timers make between $100k and $200k and going to sc
|
|
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 21 Well I don't know why they felt they were ripped off. They knew the price,
and they knew the service, and they made their own decision to go for it.
btw I don't feel passion about stern PT, or any PT for that matter. I just
felt it makes the most sense when all factor is considered. Some people
certainly prefer FT, and I won't be surprise.
btw: I read all the complaints from the 'notable number' of people when
doing my research. Believe me, there are at least ten times of people
benefited from i
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: You argued a lot on individual variability. I assume this varibility
: explains why you feel so passion about Stern PT, while many other people (
: seems to be a quite notable number) felt that Stern ripped them off.
:
: a
: most
: -
|
s*******e
发帖数: 3042 | 22 It's not like buying a car, when you pay the price you demand the same
options. As long as I get what I paid for, I don't care others get more with
the same price -- even given the option I won't be able to go full time
anyway, then that actually makes me feel lucky to live close to a top school
offering PT program, at least I don't have to fly into the city every
weekend like some others do.
Like I said in last post, nobody tricks people into paying for anything. It'
s a free market, everything
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: You played the opportunity cost argument for Stern's benefit. I believe that
: is the argument Stern used to justify treating PT students differently. You
: pay tuition and fees for services (both education and career management are
: services). The services should be equal no matter you are FT or PT, since
: tuitions are the same.
:
: a
: most
: -
|
i*c
发帖数: 1132 | 23 read through the posts. It seems the only issue with Stern's PT is on campus
recruiting?
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: PT MBA at Stern is a NO NO unless tuition is fully paid by your employer.
: Read businessweek's posts about Stern's PT before jump in.
|
i*c
发帖数: 1132 | 24 agree with you. do not understand why some part-time students think on-
campus recruiting is so important that they felt frustrated at the part-time
program. Maybe I miss something.
In fact, I am considering NYU part-time program. I do not worry about
inaccessible to on-campus recruiting but am concern with part-time studying
and full-time working may be too stressful.
just
【在 s*******e 的大作中提到】
: Well I don't know why they felt they were ripped off. They knew the price,
: and they knew the service, and they made their own decision to go for it.
: btw I don't feel passion about stern PT, or any PT for that matter. I just
: felt it makes the most sense when all factor is considered. Some people
: certainly prefer FT, and I won't be surprise.
: btw: I read all the complaints from the 'notable number' of people when
: doing my research. Believe me, there are at least ten times of people
: benefited from i
|
u**o
发帖数: 4652 | 25 我查了WHARTON， 那里说PT是给还想呆在本行业的，FT是给想转行的。NYU的是不是类
似呢？
NYU的PT MBA貌似很好的样子，不知道申请难度大不大呀 |
w******x
发帖数: 2769 | 26 PT的比的是头衔和经验, 而不是比GMAT了. |
a*******o
发帖数: 280 | 27 Wharton does not have Part time MBA, but Executive MBA.
【在 u**o 的大作中提到】
: 我查了WHARTON， 那里说PT是给还想呆在本行业的，FT是给想转行的。NYU的是不是类
: 似呢？
: NYU的PT MBA貌似很好的样子，不知道申请难度大不大呀
|
u**o
发帖数: 4652 | 28 TRUE, that is why Wharton is not my option. Just to mention it.
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: Wharton does not have Part time MBA, but Executive MBA.
|
U***A
发帖数: 42 | 29 各个学校不一样的。有些学校part time和full time难度差不多，有些part time比
full time容易很多，GMAT平均分都能低个150分左右。具体学校的要求可以看看往年学
生的profile。 |
g*******l
发帖数: 201 | 30 Anybody get info for U Texas at Austin, Part-time MBA?
thx |
