由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 美国律师都文盲吗?这么判的话,分子诊断还怎么挣钱?
相关主题
2009 IF list请教: 为什么DNA选择了Thymidine 而RNA选择了uracil?
急求几篇paper!!! thanks!看看这么一个东西能发到大概什么杂志上?
JCR 来了 NATURE 36, SCIENCE 31paper help!!! will send baozi..
请帮忙找2篇paper 全文蛋白interaction一定要证明是independent of DNA吗?
2011 IF (1-180)本科学生求助,proliferation assay和cell death assay有区别么?
我靠,哈佛的Feng Zhang太NB了Journal求助:Nature系列投哪个好?
Re "关于将来提高cancer治愈率的一个粗略预期"Nature Communication跟Cell report 哪个更靠谱点?
请问DNA methylation 测量有什么特别的问题吗?-----2013 JCR Journal Impact factor 之我见-----
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: dna话题: supreme话题: court话题: patent话题: nat
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
M*P
发帖数: 6456
1
Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
tests, such as taking samples from
the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
Supreme Court’s
Mayo opinion, I see no reason, in policy or statute, why this
breakthrough invention should be deemed patent ineligible。
k*****o
发帖数: 148
2
LOL,利好中国的测序工厂们。门槛没有了。

Nat.
to

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the

m*********9
发帖数: 232
3
被你称作文盲的律师表示:你肯定不知道35 USC 101,这个判决的background,以及要
怎么搞才能用分子诊断赚钱。

不过考虑到我们都是文盲了,就不给你解释了。
w*********o
发帖数: 3030
4
In this case, the patent lawyer didn't write the application right.
D*a
发帖数: 6830
5
楼主能否给文盲讲讲这个跟乳腺癌诊断那个划时代判决的区别在哪。当然我也可以自己
找找但是考虑到我是文盲找了估计也看不懂了。
c**********r
发帖数: 891
6
利益集团博弈的结果,楼主以为人家文盲不懂,其实人家心里明镜似的,比你明白得多
了。
F******p
发帖数: 2099
7
母体血DNA检测这个也不是seqeunom原创发明,是公认的科学应用,怎么能申请专利?
特有的protocol,equipment和reagent, analysis algorithem才可以申请专利。
c******o
发帖数: 1184
8
Sequenom 测试的可靠性还不是特别好吧

Nat.
to

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the

1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
-----2013 JCR Journal Impact factor 之我见-----2011 IF (1-180)
salary in San Diego我靠,哈佛的Feng Zhang太NB了
求推荐sequenomRe "关于将来提高cancer治愈率的一个粗略预期"
某个基因的mutation analysis,200个病人样本,请问什么方法比较好请问DNA methylation 测量有什么特别的问题吗?
2009 IF list请教: 为什么DNA选择了Thymidine 而RNA选择了uracil?
急求几篇paper!!! thanks!看看这么一个东西能发到大概什么杂志上?
JCR 来了 NATURE 36, SCIENCE 31paper help!!! will send baozi..
请帮忙找2篇paper 全文蛋白interaction一定要证明是independent of DNA吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: dna话题: supreme话题: court话题: patent话题: nat