boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - Nature will offer double blind review [zz]
相关主题
Science 对nature发动嘲讽技能
nature communications Impact Factor expected 2013, goal 12.00+
publish fee
生物大家关注的期刊有哪些?
Plos One是非常大的进步
好paper和差paper有什么区别?
邀请撰写的review会出现最后不能发表的情况么?
投稿的离奇故事
投Nature快3周了,没消息
请教NATURE投稿问题
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nature话题: review话题: reviewers话题: anonymous话题: authors
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
M*P
发帖数: 6456
1
https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
open peer review a few years ago, but the option wasn't popular.
Instead, it says that multiple surveys have indicated that double-blind
review would be a popular option, though it notes that tests at Nature
Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have had lower uptake than expected
based on such survey results. Still, Nature notes that the responses from
the authors who took that route has been positive, and it has detected no
difference in review quality.
It adds that making manuscripts anonymous will be the responsibility of the
authors and that in some small fields, true anonymity may not be possible.
j****n
发帖数: 3370
2
不知道效果如何
尤其是对大牛实验室的 看文风/参考文献就能猜出来

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

l***y
发帖数: 638
3
把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
embo journal已经这么干了

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

x******h
发帖数: 838
4
除非把经过审稿但被据的也发出来,不然对于大杂志来说这有什么用?而明显无法把被
拒的也发出来,那样这些文章还怎么嫁人?

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: 把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
: embo journal已经这么干了
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

N******K
发帖数: 10202
5
lol

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: 把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
: embo journal已经这么干了
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

M*P
发帖数: 6456
6
但是你没发确定你猜的对。我觉得这么做还是有很大好处的。防止审稿人看人下菜碟。

【在 j****n 的大作中提到】
: 不知道效果如何
: 尤其是对大牛实验室的 看文风/参考文献就能猜出来
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7

s******y
发帖数: 28562
7
这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

n******7
发帖数: 12463
8
所有可以推断作者的语句都列为作弊行为就ok了

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

M*P
发帖数: 6456
9
应该在info for author 里面加一条说不能直接或者间接在文中暴露自己身份,哈哈。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

v**********m
发帖数: 5516
10
完全可以doubleblind review,有结果后double open出版。大家都爽快些。

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

相关主题
生物大家关注的期刊有哪些?
Plos One是非常大的进步
好paper和差paper有什么区别?
邀请撰写的review会出现最后不能发表的情况么?
进入Biology版参与讨论
v**********m
发帖数: 5516
11
应该说xx组以前的工作提到过,用第三人称写作。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

c*****u
发帖数: 439
12
reviewer 看人下菜,这个也许可以解决。但是最重要的是编辑看人下菜啊。 我知道的
大牛,直接给编辑施压,reviewer的意见根本不take, 直接接受。
i*********0
发帖数: 915
13
这种情况就导致以后大家不骂reviewer开始骂编辑了。
好多好文章都是因为老板不在圈子里面,不够牛,直接过不了editor这一关。
而且nature这样做,应该会控制送审的数量,来达到一样对大牛献媚的目的。
r******8
发帖数: 1486
14
编辑那里也盲不就好了,做完决定才知道文章是谁投的

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.1

【在 c*****u 的大作中提到】
: reviewer 看人下菜,这个也许可以解决。但是最重要的是编辑看人下菜啊。 我知道的
: 大牛,直接给编辑施压,reviewer的意见根本不take, 直接接受。

r********q
发帖数: 85
15
能申nature档次类似研究的人应该不难猜出来吧?尤其还交流开会,其实审稿人和作者
都大致可以互相猜出来的

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: 但是你没发确定你猜的对。我觉得这么做还是有很大好处的。防止审稿人看人下菜碟。
q******g
发帖数: 3858
16
昨天听BMC MEDICINE的编辑说,80%的文章是被编辑据掉的。剩下的20%里,只有10%被
据掉。 可见编辑的作用有多大,特别是那些好的杂志,每年收到的投稿那么多,编辑
要选择哪些送出去review,大牛的名字肯定是考虑因素之一。
T*******g
发帖数: 2322
17
容易自己文章送到自己组

【在 r******8 的大作中提到】
: 编辑那里也盲不就好了,做完决定才知道文章是谁投的
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.1

w********h
发帖数: 12367
18
最近审了一片双盲的综述,
看看引的文献里面的内容,就知道是斯坦福的一个朋友的,
不过只能知道通讯作者是谁,不知道第一作者是谁。。。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
请教NATURE投稿问题
说说我的失败的投稿经历吧 Nature子刊 顺便听听大家建议,thanks!
请问发一篇Naure系列的review对找工作能有多大帮助?
【需要申请绿卡,要生物医学review的同学过来看】
reviewer wanted
reviewer wanted: BMC Research Notes
Review小郁闷了把,editor居然没等到审稿意见返回就决定文章发表与否?
31%剽窃率?Nature非常下作地故意抹黑中国学术界...
Nature submit 后不通知 Co-Author?
11 co-first authors Nature genetics paper!~
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nature话题: review话题: reviewers话题: anonymous话题: authors