a*****x
发帖数: 901 | 1 一个旁支的小课题，present了几次反响还不错，有人建议这么投。有谁有经验？ |
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 2 旁支就能发NN啊 厉害 审稿过程和NN article没啥不同
【在 a*****x 的大作中提到】
: 一个旁支的小课题，present了几次反响还不错，有人建议这么投。有谁有经验？
|
a*****x
发帖数: 901 | 3 I thought it should be easier. No? You have any experience?
The major project is still struggling yet -- exhausted in fighting with the
reviewers, and may give up soon... |
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 4 我们投过（不过后来自己撤回来了），从editor的态度和reviewer的态度看 不觉得他
们觉得BC比article有更低的要求，只能说他们对故事完整性的要求稍低，毕竟空间有
限。
the
【在 a*****x 的大作中提到】
: I thought it should be easier. No? You have any experience?
: The major project is still struggling yet -- exhausted in fighting with the
: reviewers, and may give up soon...
|
a*****x
发帖数: 901 | 5 Thanks. It's very novel and interesting, but not deep enough. Do u recommend
to have a try? |
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 6 恩，我挺喜欢NN的BC的，其实你们也可以考虑下eLife啊。
recommend
【在 a*****x 的大作中提到】
: Thanks. It's very novel and interesting, but not deep enough. Do u recommend
: to have a try?
|
l********e
发帖数: 37 | 7 they don't care deep that much anyway,even for article. novel and with big
shot, NN is easy, otherwise it would be harder;they are very snobbish.
recommend
【在 a*****x 的大作中提到】
: Thanks. It's very novel and interesting, but not deep enough. Do u recommend
: to have a try?
|
i**y
发帖数: 71 | 8 曾经审过一篇，我的理解是不要求深度，但是对新意要求更高。好像这个也是science
的brevia的要求
recommend
【在 a*****x 的大作中提到】
: Thanks. It's very novel and interesting, but not deep enough. Do u recommend
: to have a try?
|
