i****g
发帖数: 3896 | 1 两人同属一个领域，如果张明杰高或两人不相伯仲，那张上施下也正常吧？毕竟张明杰
参选好几回了，至少也混了个脸熟。 |
h********r
发帖数: 519 | 2 生物医学部的院士们就没人说张明杰还是加拿大国籍。
张的文章不错，但是还是没有施好，
而且不是很productive.
1年不到10片文章，那么大得lab
【在 i****g 的大作中提到】
: 两人同属一个领域，如果张明杰高或两人不相伯仲，那张上施下也正常吧？毕竟张明杰
: 参选好几回了，至少也混了个脸熟。
|
w********r
发帖数: 1431 | 3 张是香港护照
【在 h********r 的大作中提到】
: 生物医学部的院士们就没人说张明杰还是加拿大国籍。
: 张的文章不错，但是还是没有施好，
: 而且不是很productive.
: 1年不到10片文章，那么大得lab
|
b******n
发帖数: 4225 | 4 这是统战需要
国内还是崇洋媚外思想严重
外王内法
做了臣民你就得当顺民，友邦人士就是人上人
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 张是香港护照
|
I***a
发帖数: 13467 | 5 我觉得tg还是多多照顾，
国内一线年轻的人，
花大钱请这人回去，是喝毒药 |
J********n
发帖数: 534 | 6 这个说的没错了。外来的和尚会念经啊。
张明杰再过10年，也赶不上今天的施啊。
【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是统战需要
: 国内还是崇洋媚外思想严重
: 外王内法
: 做了臣民你就得当顺民，友邦人士就是人上人
|
o**4
发帖数: 35028 | 7 11公居然不骂娘，呵呵
【在 J********n 的大作中提到】
: 这个说的没错了。外来的和尚会念经啊。
: 张明杰再过10年，也赶不上今天的施啊。
|
b******y
发帖数: 627 | 8 I personally also prefer 施一公 to 张明杰 a little bit as far as academic
achievement is concerned. However, I want to point out some differences,
which complicates the literal comparison. 1) 张明杰 has been extremely
productive at HKUST and 施一公 has been extremely productive at Princeton. I
really can not think of anyone in China who is comparable with 张明杰.
However, I can point out more than a dozen in US, whose achievements are
comparable with 施一公.
2) 张明杰 has been using NMR as the primary tool in his early days and 施一
公 has always been using X-ray. It is harder for NMR studies to be published
in CNS than X-ray ones. That is why 张明杰 has mostly NSMB and Molecular
cell papers until recently when he also uses X-ray.
3) 张明杰 has a very clear theme focusing on PDZ domains all the time and
only extended to other fields lately and probably due to collaboration or
marginal relevance in synapsis. 施一公 only has a clear theme, focusing
apoptosis pathway, in the early days and has been hunting around ever since.
In summary, the difference between 张明杰 and 施一公 is not too much if
every factor is considered. |
o******d
发帖数: 204 | 9 这么说如果考虑到一个领域每次只能上一名院士，
那么施一公第一次参选没pk过张明杰也一点不冤枉啊！
饶毅干嘛这么卖力为他呐喊呢？还说今年生物学部的院士水平远不如施一公！
I
published
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: I personally also prefer 施一公 to 张明杰 a little bit as far as academic
: achievement is concerned. However, I want to point out some differences,
: which complicates the literal comparison. 1) 张明杰 has been extremely
: productive at HKUST and 施一公 has been extremely productive at Princeton. I
: really can not think of anyone in China who is comparable with 张明杰.
: However, I can point out more than a dozen in US, whose achievements are
: comparable with 施一公.
: 2) 张明杰 has been using NMR as the primary tool in his early days and 施一
: 公 has always been using X-ray. It is harder for NMR studies to be published
: in CNS than X-ray ones. That is why 张明杰 has mostly NSMB and Molecular
|
