由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 作假的同修们一定要低调啊
相关主题
弱问一下在30+人员的组里的同修们我阅读了wiki 词条 GMO Controversies, 印象总结 (转载)
前辈和同修们说说,你们什么时候ready当一个PIKnoepfler 也终于盯上韩春雨了?
看来这个法官对stem cell research的影响太大了Nature News: The controversy over NgAgo
You think it takes forever for the reviews of your paper to come back...Nature News: NgAgo gene-editing controversy escalates in peer-reviewed papers
Nature的回信 (肯定是群发,连个Title都没有)僵尸要来了
有没有人注意到 nature 出了个更正 (转载)韩春雨事件要水落石出了
European Agency's Final Verdict on Controversial GM Study: Not Scientifically Sound转 “韩春雨撤回论文”那家报道最狠?
正在写review,问个问题国际媒体对韩春雨NgAgo论文被撤的反应
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: duke话题: even话题: economist话题: relegated话题: arcane
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
t*d
发帖数: 1290
1
这期的 The Economist:
Even with all these alleged errors, the controversy might have been
relegated to an arcane debate in the scientific literature if the team at
Duke had not chosen, within a few months of the papers’ publication (and at
the time questions were being raised about the data’s quality) to launch
three clinical trials based on their work.
http://www.economist.com/node/21528593
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
国际媒体对韩春雨NgAgo论文被撤的反应Nature的回信 (肯定是群发,连个Title都没有)
Economist报道的钱路路和Winfree的研究有没有人注意到 nature 出了个更正 (转载)
Economists, Scientists Debate Research EfficiencyEuropean Agency's Final Verdict on Controversial GM Study: Not Scientifically Sound
How science goes wrong -- From The Economist正在写review,问个问题
弱问一下在30+人员的组里的同修们我阅读了wiki 词条 GMO Controversies, 印象总结 (转载)
前辈和同修们说说,你们什么时候ready当一个PIKnoepfler 也终于盯上韩春雨了?
看来这个法官对stem cell research的影响太大了Nature News: The controversy over NgAgo
You think it takes forever for the reviews of your paper to come back...Nature News: NgAgo gene-editing controversy escalates in peer-reviewed papers
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: duke话题: even话题: economist话题: relegated话题: arcane