由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - PNAS和Plos pathogen那个好?
相关主题
请教:cell host and microbe这个杂志怎么样啊?大家对nature communications怎么看
也说说Nature这期的retraction请教Nature Communication的接收率是多少,快吗?
eLife收了,这个业界承认度高么?跟我老板讨论文章发什么杂志,然后被他雷到了
Plos one大概什么档次,啥概念啊?eLife, Cell Reports, Nature Comm哪个感觉以后会更好?
求审稿机会Nature Communications全开放透露的信号
nature communications seems good!求杂志推荐
Cell Reports 怎么样Nature comm vs curr Biol?
这个是PNAS的什么文章?eLife灌水要抓紧
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: pnas话题: plos话题: china话题: pathogen话题: track
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
t*********2
发帖数: 3
1
现在有一篇文章准备中,在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多,PNAS好像名声越来越不好
,Plos又比较新,是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿?万分感谢!
c*********9
发帖数: 99
2
PNAS is better
p*****m
发帖数: 7030
3
doesn't make much difference

【在 t*********2 的大作中提到】
: 现在有一篇文章准备中,在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多,PNAS好像名声越来越不好
: ,Plos又比较新,是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
: 得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿?万分感谢!

g**********t
发帖数: 475
4
当然是PNAS,而且我觉得最近PLoS的杂志越办越烂。别看影响因子,就算看影响因子你
拿一个生物医学杂志和综合杂志比IF是不公平的。PNAS里面和PloS Pathogan方向类似
的文章单拎出来绝对要比PLoS的高一个档次。
p*******r
发帖数: 4048
5
If you want to go back to China, definitely PNAS.
PNAS is almost a nature paper in China. PLos paper = nothing in China.

【在 t*********2 的大作中提到】
: 现在有一篇文章准备中,在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多,PNAS好像名声越来越不好
: ,Plos又比较新,是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
: 得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿?万分感谢!

p*****m
发帖数: 7030
6
you must be kidding...PNAS is not that hot any more in china. PNAS probably
means JIGE nowadays.

【在 p*******r 的大作中提到】
: If you want to go back to China, definitely PNAS.
: PNAS is almost a nature paper in China. PLos paper = nothing in China.

n****g
发帖数: 1063
7
similar
A******y
发帖数: 2041
8
PNAS track II
s******y
发帖数: 28562
9
在这两者之间,绝对选择PNAS
PNAS作为一个老牌杂志,在国内的认可度远远比PLoS 系列的大部分杂志都高。
在大部分国内的学术界人眼里,PNAS 和PLoS Biology 是同一个档次的。

【在 t*********2 的大作中提到】
: 现在有一篇文章准备中,在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多,PNAS好像名声越来越不好
: ,Plos又比较新,是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
: 得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿?万分感谢!

t*********2
发帖数: 3
10
国内看PNAS区分trackIorII吗?
相关主题
nature communications seems good!大家对nature communications怎么看
Cell Reports 怎么样请教Nature Communication的接收率是多少,快吗?
这个是PNAS的什么文章?跟我老板讨论文章发什么杂志,然后被他雷到了
进入Biology版参与讨论
h********n
发帖数: 4079
11
以后PNAS没有两个track了, 全部直接投稿.
p*****m
发帖数: 7030
12
believe me, it's not gonna happen.

【在 h********n 的大作中提到】
: 以后PNAS没有两个track了, 全部直接投稿.
I***a
发帖数: 13467
13
想以后可能回国,
绝对是PNAS,
B****a
发帖数: 1526
14
so you think they will retract their decision?
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full

【在 p*****m 的大作中提到】
: believe me, it's not gonna happen.
h********n
发帖数: 4079
15
恩, 我刚才想贴这个链接的, 懒了一下.

【在 B****a 的大作中提到】
: so you think they will retract their decision?
: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full

p*****m
发帖数: 7030
16
这个是取消track III么?PNAS本质就是院士俱乐部 院士contribution是不可能取消的

【在 B****a 的大作中提到】
: so you think they will retract their decision?
: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full

g**********t
发帖数: 475
17
其实我也认为PNAS和Plos biology是一个档次。PNAS烂文章有,但是好文章也很多。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 在这两者之间,绝对选择PNAS
: PNAS作为一个老牌杂志,在国内的认可度远远比PLoS 系列的大部分杂志都高。
: 在大部分国内的学术界人眼里,PNAS 和PLoS Biology 是同一个档次的。

A******y
发帖数: 2041
18
Currently PNAS has three way of submitting paper: Contributed, edited (track
II), and communicated. Only the communicated ones are been eliminated. A
lot of edited track two papers are actually very good, and the contributed
line is still open after the change. So the PNAS members won't complaint too
much.
PLoS Biology and PLoS medicine are the top two journals in PLoS. I don't
think PLoS pathogen are as high as those two and don't confuse them. PLoS
One is the true open access and I like i
p*******r
发帖数: 4048
19
Are there also academian's club journals in China?

(track
A
contributed
complaint too
don't
PLoS
won't

【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Currently PNAS has three way of submitting paper: Contributed, edited (track
: II), and communicated. Only the communicated ones are been eliminated. A
: lot of edited track two papers are actually very good, and the contributed
: line is still open after the change. So the PNAS members won't complaint too
: much.
: PLoS Biology and PLoS medicine are the top two journals in PLoS. I don't
: think PLoS pathogen are as high as those two and don't confuse them. PLoS
: One is the true open access and I like i

n********k
发帖数: 2818
20
do u want to star Chinese version of plos one..., I would help:)))

【在 p*******r 的大作中提到】
: Are there also academian's club journals in China?
:
: (track
: A
: contributed
: complaint too
: don't
: PLoS
: won't

t*********2
发帖数: 3
21
PNAS和cell host and microbes比呢?
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
eLife灌水要抓紧求审稿机会
Nature Communication和eLife哪个跟被认可些?nature communications seems good!
请问PLOS Pathogens审稿速度如何?Cell Reports 怎么样
PLoS Pathogens审稿也太慢了点了吧这个是PNAS的什么文章?
请教:cell host and microbe这个杂志怎么样啊?大家对nature communications怎么看
也说说Nature这期的retraction请教Nature Communication的接收率是多少,快吗?
eLife收了,这个业界承认度高么?跟我老板讨论文章发什么杂志,然后被他雷到了
Plos one大概什么档次,啥概念啊?eLife, Cell Reports, Nature Comm哪个感觉以后会更好?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: pnas话题: plos话题: china话题: pathogen话题: track