a*******r 发帖数: 67 | 1 原文:
"Perhaps the most poignant experience came while we were talking to the
local party secretary in Che Jia Va, who gave us directions and pointed out
various landmarks -- all the while keeping a stoic face. The town was once
home to 13,000 people, and 3,000 are still missing, he says.
As he shows me the damage to his community, I ask how many have died
. Tears flow down his cheeks, and he makes no effort to wipe them away. He
says that as many as 500 are dead, including his parents, his wife a | p**********6 发帖数: 3408 | 2
这个例子恰恰说明了所谓“圣经无误”是扯淡。在这个例子中,我的反应不一样并不是
基于的前提不同,而是基于事实的不同。
我们家的衣柜每天都有小矮人出来走出门去,这是极其令人吃惊的声称,于是需要极其
确实的证据,光凭小孩的证词是远远不能够算数的。
在魔术的情况下,魔术师从来没有宣称他们的东西是真实的,相反,如果他说那是魔术
,其实是在宣称那是假的,只不过他用了巧妙的方法来试图瞒过我。所有看魔术的人都
知道这点,大家都知道是在被骗,魔术师骗得越成功,大家就越开心,谁也不会冲上台
去检查魔术师的装置,并宣布魔术师其实是在骗人。
相反,如果一个人宣称他真能让柜子里不断走出来小矮人来,不是魔术,而是真实,那
么这是极其令人吃惊的声称,于是需要极其确实的证据。我们绝不会光在象魔术那样在
台下看看,而会要求那些器材比如说柜子之类地被可信的第三方仔细检查。一旦发现那
其实是弄虚作假,我们不会开心,不会说那是一个成功的魔术师,而会称其为骗子。
是我家的衣柜,还是魔术师的衣柜,这是事实的不同,而非前提的不同。难道说哪位把
前提改为“我家的衣柜会不断走出小矮人”,我就该相信我家的衣柜会不断走出小矮人
了?凭什 |
|