B*********s 发帖数: 4158 | |
a***n 发帖数: 5520 | 2 15 out就判输?
【在 B*********s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 还真有可能被直接判输,已经15 out了
|
n*******e 发帖数: 2213 | 3 I am pretty sure if Rays did not score the tying run, they are still playing
.
The rule book is very clear on this. If the game not tied after five innings
are in the book, yet gets suspended, and does not get resumed before the st
art of next day, the leading team wins. There is no way MLB suspends the gam
e knowing that the World Series champion is decided in this manner. I person
ally would not want Phillies to win in this fashion either, although I fully
understand that the momentum is in Ra
【在 B*********s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 还真有可能被直接判输,已经15 out了
|
q**u 发帖数: 12289 | 4 主场领先,四局半就可以判输。
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 15 out就判输?
|
a***n 发帖数: 5665 | 5 the old rule doesnt make sense ah.
playing
innings
st
gam
person
fully
g
6th
【在 n*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I am pretty sure if Rays did not score the tying run, they are still playing : . : The rule book is very clear on this. If the game not tied after five innings : are in the book, yet gets suspended, and does not get resumed before the st : art of next day, the leading team wins. There is no way MLB suspends the gam : e knowing that the World Series champion is decided in this manner. I person : ally would not want Phillies to win in this fashion either, although I fully : understand that the momentum is in Ra
|
n*******e 发帖数: 2213 | 6 it makes sense if you think about it. the team who scores in the top of the
6th has 3 more outs (which result in runs), which gives them unfair advantag
es.
I like the current rule more. It is more fair, needless to say.
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : the old rule doesnt make sense ah. : : playing : innings : st : gam : person : fully : g : 6th
|
a***n 发帖数: 5665 | 7 i say it doesnt make sense coz u nullify the runs one team scored.
the
advantag
【在 n*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : it makes sense if you think about it. the team who scores in the top of the : 6th has 3 more outs (which result in runs), which gives them unfair advantag : es. : I like the current rule more. It is more fair, needless to say.
|
j***h 发帖数: 152 | 8 平时的比赛随便一点,WS怎么可能采用判定
即使光芒没得分
【在 B*********s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 还真有可能被直接判输,已经15 out了
|
n*******e 发帖数: 2213 | 9 then what you do?
no rule is perfect. it needs to be placed on a fairground and can be judged
with reason.
it is just like what fed does, right? the fomc does not change interest rat
e to respond to the market, it tries to insert dynamical control ahead of ti
me. to me, that decision has a good chance to yield unpredictable results. s
till it is the best you can do. so you go ahead and do it.
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : i say it doesnt make sense coz u nullify the runs one team scored. : : the : advantag
|
n*******e 发帖数: 2213 | 10 对,尤其在比赛结果直接决定ws归属的时候。
我觉得这样挺好的。虽然对两只球队的球迷是煎熬。
【在 j***h 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 平时的比赛随便一点,WS怎么可能采用判定 : 即使光芒没得分
|
|
|
B*********s 发帖数: 4158 | 11 如果是今天是rays在最后2 runs,比赛终止,判rays胜?
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : i say it doesnt make sense coz u nullify the runs one team scored. : : the : advantag
|
a***n 发帖数: 5665 | 12 the new rule makes perfect sense ah. dont understand why it wasnt instigated
in the first place.
judged
rat
ti
s
【在 n*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : then what you do? : no rule is perfect. it needs to be placed on a fairground and can be judged : with reason. : it is just like what fed does, right? the fomc does not change interest rat : e to respond to the market, it tries to insert dynamical control ahead of ti : me. to me, that decision has a good chance to yield unpredictable results. s : till it is the best you can do. so you go ahead and do it.
|
n*******e 发帖数: 2213 | 13 no. the game is suspended.
rays cannot win with 3 more outs.
【在 B*********s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 如果是今天是rays在最后2 runs,比赛终止,判rays胜?
|
n*******e 发帖数: 2213 | 14 it was because this type of situation very rarely comes into play in importa
nt games.
162 regular season games. if a team loses one game because of the old rule,
no big deal. but when it comes to postseason play, it is big. i am not sure
what prompted mlb to change the rules. but yeah, the change is for the bette
r.
instigated
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : the new rule makes perfect sense ah. dont understand why it wasnt instigated : in the first place. : : judged : rat : ti : s
|
B*****t 发帖数: 3012 | 15 如果真是下刀子比赛没法打了,打完4局半主队领先就可以判定比赛结束了。。。
所以光芒真是捡了条命。
playing
innings
st
gam
person
fully
g
6th
【在 n*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I am pretty sure if Rays did not score the tying run, they are still playing : . : The rule book is very clear on this. If the game not tied after five innings : are in the book, yet gets suspended, and does not get resumed before the st : art of next day, the leading team wins. There is no way MLB suspends the gam : e knowing that the World Series champion is decided in this manner. I person : ally would not want Phillies to win in this fashion either, although I fully : understand that the momentum is in Ra
|
B*****t 发帖数: 3012 | 16 按照规则不能判official game,应该是择日接着打。
【在 B*********s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 如果是今天是rays在最后2 runs,比赛终止,判rays胜?
|