t**x 发帖数: 20965 | 1 But there is one fact which is very interesting.
If you own a car which has autopilot facilities then, if they know about
this, , not increase it. They clearly believe that, when engaged in suitable
circumstances, an autopilot is a safer driver than a human. To quote from
the article, “It is estimated that human error is at least partly
responsible for more than 90% of current road fatalities.”
And insurers are not reducing premiums based on a whim or a guess. They are
doing it because they have statistics that cars using automatic “assistive
” driver technologies have fewer claims than those without them.
The , and even when the car cannot avoid a crash it will have reduced speed
considerably.
You can understand why autopilot is safer within the limited scope of its
capabilities. It never suffers from a lack of attention, and is never
careless. It either can cope with something or it can’t, and if it can’t
it generally knows it and will insist the driver takes control, or it will
bring the car to a halt. | d********e 发帖数: 1720 | 2
suitable
are
assistive
speed
到底有Autopilot保险是便宜了还是贵了?为什么出事后没人claim?
【在 t**x 的大作中提到】 : But there is one fact which is very interesting. : If you own a car which has autopilot facilities then, if they know about : this, , not increase it. They clearly believe that, when engaged in suitable : circumstances, an autopilot is a safer driver than a human. To quote from : the article, “It is estimated that human error is at least partly : responsible for more than 90% of current road fatalities.” : And insurers are not reducing premiums based on a whim or a guess. They are : doing it because they have statistics that cars using automatic “assistive : ” driver technologies have fewer claims than those without them. : The , and even when the car cannot avoid a crash it will have reduced speed
|
|