g***0
发帖数: 123 | |
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 2 IIHS说得很清楚，撞障碍物性质的测试和车重有一定关系，但是侧撞结果和车重没有关
系。
passat和jetta就是个poor，你怎么托都没用。
【在 g***0 的大作中提到】
: http://www.iihs.org/research/qanda/vehicle_size_and_weight.aspx
|
t**********3
发帖数: 12623 | 3 丰田凌志就是断A柱，怎么舔都没用
【在 I******I 的大作中提到】
: IIHS说得很清楚，撞障碍物性质的测试和车重有一定关系，但是侧撞结果和车重没有关
: 系。
: passat和jetta就是个poor，你怎么托都没用。
|
g***0
发帖数: 123 | 4 根据iish的说法，这个还和驾驶习惯有关，并且随着不同年份，社会环境变化都有影响
。但：iihs坚决的说：
4 Do bigger vehicles pose a threat to occupants of smaller vehicles?
A lighter vehicle will always be at a disadvantage in a collision with a
heavier vehicle. Beyond weight differences, SUVs and pickups historically
have posed a danger to people in cars because their energy-absorbing
structures didn’t line up with those of lower-profile vehicles. As a
consequence of such incompatible designs, cars would often underride SUVs
and pickups, resulting in more severe damage and a higher risk of injury and
death. An analysis of crashes in 2000-01 involving 1997-99 model vehicles
showed that SUVs and pickups were much more likely than cars or minivans of
the same weight to be involved in crashes that killed occupants of other
cars or minivans. 4
This mismatch has faded as a problem in recent years, thanks to new
designs of SUVs and pickups. The energy-absorbing structures of these
vehicles are now lower so that they line up better with those of cars. The
new designs came out of a voluntary agreement forged by automakers, the
government and IIHS in 2003. A more recent study of 2008-09 crashes
involving 2005-08 models showed that SUVs were no more likely than cars to
be in crashes in which occupants of other cars died. 5 Pickups still killed
people in other vehicles at a higher rate, but the difference was much
smaller than it was previously.
看不懂英文的chinatown的就算了。 |
k*******q
发帖数: 5493 | 5 皮卡的霸主地位是不变的
a
and
【在 g***0 的大作中提到】
: 根据iish的说法，这个还和驾驶习惯有关，并且随着不同年份，社会环境变化都有影响
: 。但：iihs坚决的说：
: 4 Do bigger vehicles pose a threat to occupants of smaller vehicles?
: A lighter vehicle will always be at a disadvantage in a collision with a
: heavier vehicle. Beyond weight differences, SUVs and pickups historically
: have posed a danger to people in cars because their energy-absorbing
: structures didn’t line up with those of lower-profile vehicles. As a
: consequence of such incompatible designs, cars would often underride SUVs
: and pickups, resulting in more severe damage and a higher risk of injury and
: death. An analysis of crashes in 2000-01 involving 1997-99 model vehicles
|
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 6 passat门都掉下来了，奥迪A4一样断A柱，德国佬的屎就这么香？
【在 t**********3 的大作中提到】
: 丰田凌志就是断A柱，怎么舔都没用
|
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 7 ydzhang，肚里没文化就别装。side impact测试结果和测试车重量没有关系。
a
and
【在 g***0 的大作中提到】
: 根据iish的说法，这个还和驾驶习惯有关，并且随着不同年份，社会环境变化都有影响
: 。但：iihs坚决的说：
: 4 Do bigger vehicles pose a threat to occupants of smaller vehicles?
: A lighter vehicle will always be at a disadvantage in a collision with a
: heavier vehicle. Beyond weight differences, SUVs and pickups historically
: have posed a danger to people in cars because their energy-absorbing
: structures didn’t line up with those of lower-profile vehicles. As a
: consequence of such incompatible designs, cars would often underride SUVs
: and pickups, resulting in more severe damage and a higher risk of injury and
: death. An analysis of crashes in 2000-01 involving 1997-99 model vehicles
|
l*********u
发帖数: 19053 | 8 re
大而重就是安全，最基本物理定律。只有日托才硬拗。
1 How do a vehicle’s size and weight affect safety?
All other things being equal, occupants in a bigger, heavier vehicle are
better protected than those in a smaller, lighter vehicle. Both size and
weight affect the forces people inside a vehicle experience during a crash.
The magnitude of those forces is directly related to the risk of injury.
In the case of size, the longer distance from the front of the vehicle
to the occupant compartment gives a bigger vehicle an advantage in frontal
crashes, which account for 41 percent of passenger vehicle occupant deaths.
The longer that distance, the bigger the crush zone, and the lower the
forces on the occupants.
Weight comes into play in a collision involving two vehicles. The bigger
vehicle will push the lighter one backward during the impact. As a result,
there will be less force on the occupants of the heavier vehicle and more on
the people in the lighter vehicle. Heavier vehicles also fare better in
some single-vehicle crashes because they are more likely to move, bend or
deform objects they hit.
IIHS demonstrated the role of size and weight in a series of crash tests
in 2009 in which a microcar and two minicars were each crashed into a
midsize car from the same manufacturer. The Smart Fortwo, Honda Fit and
Toyota Yaris all had good ratings in the Institute’s moderate overlap
frontal test, but all three performed poorly in the crashes with midsize
cars.
2 Are people less likely to be killed or injured in a bigger, heavier
vehicle?
Yes. Driver death rates calculated by IIHS illustrate the real-world
advantages of bigger, heavier vehicles. For example, as a group, in 2011
very large cars 1-3 years old had 24 deaths per million registered vehicles,
while minicars had 65. Of the 26 vehicles with the lowest driver death
rates from the 2005-08 model years during 2006-09, all but three were
midsize or larger. More than half of those with the highest rates were small
vehicles or minicars.
Improvements in crash protection have made vehicles of all sizes safer,
but, as illustrated in the figure below, an advantage persists for bigger
vehicles, as measured by shadow, or length times width. Size and weight are
highly correlated, so the figure would look similar if weight were used
instead.
【在 g***0 的大作中提到】
: http://www.iihs.org/research/qanda/vehicle_size_and_weight.aspx
|
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 9 老黄牛，你的智商就是典型的毛轮水平。
side impact对所有车都是公平的，都是同一质量的铁架车以同一速度对侧面进行碰撞
，所有车无论大小，结果都具有可比性。
你的大而重的美车，侧撞结果就是屎一样。
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=708
are
.
.
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: re
: 大而重就是安全，最基本物理定律。只有日托才硬拗。
: 1 How do a vehicle’s size and weight affect safety?
: All other things being equal, occupants in a bigger, heavier vehicle are
: better protected than those in a smaller, lighter vehicle. Both size and
: weight affect the forces people inside a vehicle experience during a crash.
: The magnitude of those forces is directly related to the risk of injury.
: In the case of size, the longer distance from the front of the vehicle
: to the occupant compartment gives a bigger vehicle an advantage in frontal
: crashes, which account for 41 percent of passenger vehicle occupant deaths.
|
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | |
|
|
l***j
发帖数: 3977 | 11 难道车和地面的摩擦力不用考虑
【在 I******I 的大作中提到】
: 老黄牛，你的智商就是典型的毛轮水平。
: side impact对所有车都是公平的，都是同一质量的铁架车以同一速度对侧面进行碰撞
: ，所有车无论大小，结果都具有可比性。
: 你的大而重的美车，侧撞结果就是屎一样。
: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=708
:
: are
: .
: .
|
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 12 德粉不断发明新理论。
【在 l***j 的大作中提到】
: 难道车和地面的摩擦力不用考虑
|
l***j
发帖数: 3977 | 13 不明白你什么意思
显然车和地面摩擦力越大 越不利于这种侧面强度测试
【在 I******I 的大作中提到】
: 德粉不断发明新理论。
|
l***j
发帖数: 3977 | 14 这位日粉不吭声了？
【在 I******I 的大作中提到】
: 德粉不断发明新理论。
|
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 15 你想说大车摩擦力大，所以side impact会吃亏？
劝你少跟ydzhang和电膈学，智商降得太低。
【在 l***j 的大作中提到】
: 不明白你什么意思
: 显然车和地面摩擦力越大 越不利于这种侧面强度测试
|
