a***y 发帖数: 19743 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mifepristone (弃婴) 于 (Tue May 11 15:39:02 2010, 美东) 提到:
居然ipad在中国的商标权是香港人的,而且还是10年前就办的老商标,
主营也是IT产品。另外不但商标是别人的,连外观专利也不是苹果的。
要是ipad商标所有者香港唯冠要求中国法院查封富士康,这场戏就演
大了!
这世界,真是豺狼遍地啊,老虎费了好大劲咬死一头羊,正要开吃呢,
突然发现身后一大群豺狼流着口水虎视眈眈地瞧着
http://tech.163.com/10/0511/01/66C9J9HO000915BD.html
“唯冠所拥有的IPAD商标在中国受保护范围包括同类商品在国内的生产和销售。”广东
君言律师事务所合伙人律师刘辉表示,尽管iPad在中国还没有销售,但iPad在中国生产
,其实已经构成侵权。商标所有者有权要求查抄工厂,并要求海关扣留和没收出境的
iPad产品。不过,刘辉也表示,外观侵权认定相对麻烦,不像商标侵权那么明显。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
karajan (不挖坑,少灌水) 于 (Tue May 11 15:56:51 2010, 美东) 提到:
基本上能用银子摆平的
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
swuwan (kkksd) 于 (Tue May 11 16:18:38 2010, 美东) 提到:
你那种情况叫双输,做生意的人最后尽量做双赢
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
meeweek (Meeweek 米粥) 于 (Tue May 11 16:29:53 2010, 美东) 提到:
re 楼上们.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
smm (test) 于 (Tue May 11 16:46:02 2010, 美东) 提到:
就想敲点钱而已
苹果现在财大气粗,拔根毛就搞定了
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
maisai (卖菜) 于 (Wed May 12 02:04:02 2010, 美东) 提到:
盗版DVD满大街,全民盗版,这种地方竟然还讲商标权版权。可笑可笑啊
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
righthand21 (甩甩) 于 (Wed May 12 02:22:15 2010, 美东) 提到:
为神马我国内有朋友已经捧着ipad玩了一阵子鸟。。。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
dfehHo (t123) 于 (Wed May 12 02:23:04 2010, 美东) 提到:
刚刚查了一下唯冠,好想还曾经出产过EMC牌的TV, 一台湾无赖企业
http://msss.fabao365.com/info/37997/
http://realforum.zkiz.com/thread.php?tid=4309
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
dancooper (dancooper) 于 (Wed May 12 02:37:20 2010, 美东) 提到:
当年intel的奔腾在台湾也是花钱买来的商标
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
charming (这位姑娘,请留步!) 于 (Wed May 12 08:31:49 2010, 美东) 提到:
楼主寡闻了,这种情况用钱绝对搞定。iphone商标在中国原来是由汉王持有的,后来还
不是一样销售?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
NCat (ruki) 于 (Wed May 12 09:31:46 2010, 美东) 提到:
你说的这个跟楼主说的没有关联。不过国内人确实已经买了不少iPad了。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
boycott (haha) 于 (Wed May 12 13:05:41 2010, 美东) 提到:
被侵权索赔叫无赖?
果fan们的标准真的有问题
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
maoxong (wastewater) 于 (Wed May 12 14:15:10 2010, 美东) 提到:
Apple只要和大运营商勾结,还怕唯冠螳螂挡车?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
karajan (不挖坑,少灌水) 于 (Wed May 12 14:37:43 2010, 美东) 提到:
还不都是美国神医搞回去的?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
vt1000 (蜀都笑笑生) 于 (Wed May 12 15:49:26 2010, 美东) 提到:
exactly
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
EVDO (Evolution-Data Optimized) 于 (Wed May 12 16:29:12 2010, 美东) 提到:
Fujitsu以前有叫ipad的产品,后来Apple花了钱
Fujitsu Says it Owns Rights to 'iPad' Name, Not Apple
Sarah Jacobsson, PC World
Jan 28, 2010 2:57 pm
Apple's iPad is barely a day old, and it's already facing legal troubles.
Not terribly surprising, as "iPad" is hardly original — and Apple has a
history of stealing names that are registered trademarks of other companies.
Japanese electronics company Fujitsu built a handheld computing device in
2002 — complete with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and VoIP support — called the iPad.
The Fujitsu iPad features a 3.5-inch color touch screen and an Intel chip.
The Fujitsu iPad (which had a considerably higher price point at its time of
release — $2000 to Apple's entry-level price of $499) is most commonly
used by shop clerks in retail stores for keeping track of inventory and
recording sales.
According to the New York Times, Fujitsu wanted the iPad name back in 2003
— and still wants it today. The company first applied to trademark the name
"iPad" in 2003, though the application ran into problems because another
company — Mag-Tek — was already using the name for a handheld number-
encrypting device.
That's right, there's more than one iPad floating around out there.
In early 2009, Fujitsu's trademark application was declared abandoned by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, but the company re-opened its application
in June. Since the re-instatement of the Fujitsu application, Apple has
been trying to take it away (via proxy) — in fact, they've filed three
petitions to extend the deadline. Apple now has until Feb. 28 to oppose
Fujitsu's claims.
And it looks the gauntlet's been thrown — according to the Wall Street
Journal , Fujitsu is consulting lawyers over the next steps, as it is the
company's understanding that the name is Fujitsu's.
While Apple and Fujitsu battle it out, there are other products using the
semi-trademarked name "iPad" — including a padded bra by Canadian lingerie
company Coconut Grove Intimates, motors and engines by German technology
company Siemens, and a tablet computer by ST Microelectronics.
I'll let you in on a little secret: PC World actually wrote about the iPad
— handheld, internet-connected, and with a pretty little touch screen —
back in 2002.
That's right, we scooped the throngs of iPad wannabe reviewers -- kinda.
-----------------------
Fujitsu Surrenders "iPad" to Apple Before Launch
3:00 PM - March 29, 2010 - By Jane McEntegart - Source : Tom's Guide US
Just in the nick of time.
When Apple launched the iPad, a significant amount of attention was paid to
the fact that the company did not yet own the iPad name. Fujitsu had filed
for a trademark on the name in 2003, after it began selling a touchscreen
Windows CE device designed to help shop clerks verify prices, check real-
time inventory data and close sales on the go.
At the time Fujitsu remained quiet about its plans. An internal memo
revealed that anyone receiving inquiries about the name were to issue the
following statement:
"Fujitsu is aware of Apple’s iPad announcement and the possible
infringement on our trademark, which has been in use in connection with
Fujitsu mobile retailing computer products since 2002. We are currently
discussing our options with our trademark counsel and have no further
comment at this time."
CNet today has evidence that Fujitsu has transferred the iPad name to Apple.
While details of the transfer are not available, it's safe to assume Apple
provided Fujitsu with some monetary compensation in exchange for the name.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
howto (各说各话) 于 (Wed May 12 17:08:52 2010, 美东) 提到:
自己偷别人是对自己有好处,当然没关系
别人偷自己是吃亏啊,当然要维权
这么简单的道理都想不通?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
iMacPro (Apple) 于 (Wed May 12 17:11:35 2010, 美东) 提到:
现在卖的越多要价就会越高。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Lemures (Dr. No) 于 (Wed May 12 21:19:02 2010, 美东) 提到:
很简单,换成中国名字 "爱派得" 好了..HIA HIA
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
seiya (天馬流星拳 - 飛呀飛呀我的馬) 于 (Wed May 12 21:37:23 2010, 美东) 提到:
一拍得,
让,八方交往,酒薄烟断,十分坦荡!
which reflects their Shability.
sure...
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
rhapsody ( input type=\"button\" value=) 于 (Wed May 12 22:42:28 2010, 美东) 提到:
"10亿~20亿元的债务"的公司往往是无赖公司。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
dfehHo (t123) 于 (Thu May 13 00:58:20 2010, 美东) 提到:
我看这个情况就象当年SCO group起诉IBM的linux侵权一样,
当然有些人看问题的角度不一样.
我还有RTOS,winME,win7,winVista,Win7,redhat,
unbuntu的机器呢,果fan吗?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
zuoluo (洗心革面加入ebiz) 于 (Thu May 13 10:35:47 2010, 美东) 提到:
win7,Win7
这两台有什么区别吗? |
|