w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 1 开的api，真被人用了赶快block了
Google disallows Facebook from siphoning email data, demands two-way flow of
information
By Darren Murph posted Nov 8th 2010 9:58AM
Feisty, are we Google? As the battle between these two internet powers
continues to intensify, Google has fired the latest shot by outright
blocking Facebook (and potentially others) from accessing its users'
information. As the story goes, Facebook members can easily import their
Google contact list in order to find friends on The Social Network, but
according to El Goog, that leaves users "in a data dead end." Evidently
Google is somewhat perturbed that the data flow isn't a two-way street,
noting that it "will no longer allow websites to automate the import of
users' Google Contacts (via its API) unless they allow similar export to
other sites." We're hearing that the change is being made gradually, with no
ETA on a Facebook status update regarding the tiff. Sometime tells us some
serious digital drama is about to go down, though the use of bad grammar and
shrtnd wrds will prbly lessn the effct. | m*****e
发帖数: 4193 | 2 Google made a right move. | a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 3 Facebook不是也block Ping吗
of
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: 开的api，真被人用了赶快block了
: Google disallows Facebook from siphoning email data, demands two-way flow of
: information
: By Darren Murph posted Nov 8th 2010 9:58AM
: Feisty, are we Google? As the battle between these two internet powers
: continues to intensify, Google has fired the latest shot by outright
: blocking Facebook (and potentially others) from accessing its users'
: information. As the story goes, Facebook members can easily import their
: Google contact list in order to find friends on The Social Network, but
: according to El Goog, that leaves users "in a data dead end." Evidently
| w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 4 facebook 有标榜自己open么？
facebook有明确的term，google是改term。
flow
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: Facebook不是也block Ping吗
:
: of
| m*****e
发帖数: 4193 | 5
Oh please, facebook changes term all the time.
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: facebook 有标榜自己open么？
: facebook有明确的term，google是改term。
:
: flow
| j**h
发帖数: 173 | 6 Facebook could be the No. 1 threat to Google's ads business. People are
saying Google's search is about
collecting the demand for business, but Facebook's social network can
generate demand and in the
meantime collecting demand better. So this is a necessary move from Google'
s perspective. I don't agree
with your title though. Yes, it's hypocritical for Google to maintain they
are open, but it doesn't put them
into the category of whores. It's just business competition.
And I have issues with both of them. The users of google search or facebook
are not their customers - they
earn money from advertisers. They do have incentives to get more users, but
keeping advertisers happy is
their ultimate goal, and dominating the playing fields (search and social
graph) are more important than
privacy or anything else. This is just like M$ on the PC market, which was *
driven* by corporate IT, and
keeping the IT people happy has always been more important than end users.
The result is dismal user
experience (Windows 7 is fine). On the contrary, Apple's customers are
usually the end users, and therefore
the user experience is their ultimate concern. That's the reason I trust
this company more than the other
two. It's about the incentives, not about open or closed, not about don't be
evil.
of
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: 开的api，真被人用了赶快block了
: Google disallows Facebook from siphoning email data, demands two-way flow of
: information
: By Darren Murph posted Nov 8th 2010 9:58AM
: Feisty, are we Google? As the battle between these two internet powers
: continues to intensify, Google has fired the latest shot by outright
: blocking Facebook (and potentially others) from accessing its users'
: information. As the story goes, Facebook members can easily import their
: Google contact list in order to find friends on The Social Network, but
: according to El Goog, that leaves users "in a data dead end." Evidently
| f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 7 赞一个包容百川的苹果版
flow of
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: 开的api，真被人用了赶快block了
: Google disallows Facebook from siphoning email data, demands two-way flow of
: information
: By Darren Murph posted Nov 8th 2010 9:58AM
: Feisty, are we Google? As the battle between these two internet powers
: continues to intensify, Google has fired the latest shot by outright
: blocking Facebook (and potentially others) from accessing its users'
: information. As the story goes, Facebook members can easily import their
: Google contact list in order to find friends on The Social Network, but
: according to El Goog, that leaves users "in a data dead end." Evidently
| w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 8 say say 吧。 我现在不用facebook。也不用ping。
buzz气得我难受。我用me。com和google的一些service。
facebook好像有开放api，但没有标榜自己open
我觉得google如果自己开了api，后来因为竞争来改变不是很大气。
自己只是用open来catchup。面对竞争就close掉。
【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: Oh please, facebook changes term all the time.
| w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 9 有啥意见？
【在 f********m 的大作中提到】
: 赞一个包容百川的苹果版
:
: flow of
| f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 10 帮您把牌坊挂上，免得忘了
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: 有啥意见？
| | | w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 11 这里有对你PA么？你觉得google做的和倡导的一致，可以反驳呀。这里没有PA的话允许
你唱颂google吧
google很多次都是立个牌坊喊口号，自己做不到。
其它的商家，可以说没几个好鸟，但没那么刻意粉饰自己的。
【在 f********m 的大作中提到】
: 帮您把牌坊挂上，免得忘了
| f********m
发帖数: 8397 | 12 我吃饱了撑的歌颂google干什么，他又不给我发工资。世界上不是每个人都吃了鸡蛋就
爱上母鸡的
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: 这里有对你PA么？你觉得google做的和倡导的一致，可以反驳呀。这里没有PA的话允许
: 你唱颂google吧
: google很多次都是立个牌坊喊口号，自己做不到。
: 其它的商家，可以说没几个好鸟，但没那么刻意粉饰自己的。
| m*****e
发帖数: 4193 | 13
What Google is saying is that open is a two way street. If you use my open
API then you have to be open too.
I see nothing wrong with that. GPL is exactly like that and people don't
call it "closed".
Sure, Google feels threatened by Facebook and that's the primary motivation
of this policy change. Google is still a business.
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: say say 吧。 我现在不用facebook。也不用ping。
: buzz气得我难受。我用me。com和google的一些service。
: facebook好像有开放api，但没有标榜自己open
: 我觉得google如果自己开了api，后来因为竞争来改变不是很大气。
: 自己只是用open来catchup。面对竞争就close掉。
| w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 14 I don't think what google did is wrong, it looks more fair now.
But google's open is inconsistant when facing competition or business
interest.
they want to do something , it is fine, just dont' keep painting themselves.
the inconsistancy happend in when google choose to bail out china,
and when they talkabout online privacy, copyright, giving user choice in
mobile phone etc..
you won't expect companies like oracle doing such thing, because they don't
package them as the moral standard for other company, they don't act as the
saver of the world.
I like to see google bring revolutionary new technology to the world, but
they really lost my respect in how they paintthemselves.
motivation
【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: What Google is saying is that open is a two way street. If you use my open
: API then you have to be open too.
: I see nothing wrong with that. GPL is exactly like that and people don't
: call it "closed".
: Sure, Google feels threatened by Facebook and that's the primary motivation
: of this policy change. Google is still a business.
| s******r
发帖数: 5309 | 15 Why should people care about facebook? the only things people do there are
uploading photos of themselves, pets, and children, and send updates such as
, I just took a shower, I am eating, I am taking a piss, etc. There is
nothing valuable on facebook except the information of who knows who and
what is their relation. From business point of view, the name of the person
is not important. Since most facebook users are gmail users, google should
be able to figure out the network easily by analyzing the gmail database.
Some say the facebook users recommend products to friends, that's false, no
one would do that. | f**********r
发帖数: 2137 | 16 现在facebook上很多产品都有自己的page,你like了它就会在news feed里看到更新
as
person
no
【在 s******r 的大作中提到】
: Why should people care about facebook? the only things people do there are
: uploading photos of themselves, pets, and children, and send updates such as
: , I just took a shower, I am eating, I am taking a piss, etc. There is
: nothing valuable on facebook except the information of who knows who and
: what is their relation. From business point of view, the name of the person
: is not important. Since most facebook users are gmail users, google should
: be able to figure out the network easily by analyzing the gmail database.
: Some say the facebook users recommend products to friends, that's false, no
: one would do that.
|
|
