r*******z
发帖数: 49 | 1 three requirements of a legally enforceable contract
其中有一条， a lack of defenses.
请问一下，是什么意思？
多谢哦 | D**********8
发帖数: 403 | 2 lack of defense means no defense. R5里有提到很多valid defenses when the
party to be sued,这里是讲those valid defenses 对你都没用，你不能拿这些来脱罪
。所以这个合同是有效的，对双方都有约束力。 | c*****a
发帖数: 1577 | 3 帮你听了一下becker的video lecture. Peter是这样说的这里：
“A lack of defenses – For an agreement to be legally enforceable, there’s
got to be no defenses, no reason, no good reason, for not performing.If one
of the parties has a defense, hey you breached the contract. Or you know
what? There was no consideration or you committed fraud or you had a gun to
my head.Whatever the case may be, if there’s a defense, that would make the
agreement unenforceable. ”
希望有帮助！
-------------------------------------------------------------
Affirmative defenses include:
mistake;
incapacity, including mental incompetence and infancy/minority;
duress;
undue influence;
unconscionability;
misrepresentation/fraud; and
frustration of purpose. |
|
