x*****i
发帖数: 253 | 1 stronger than xqlearner. xqlearner was not even in playoff of olympiad.
this one is the strongest one *on the market*, there are some other
good ones but not available for sale.
xqlearner is old too? have not seen it being update for long while. |
|
|
|
|
d****n
发帖数: 102 | 5 Is this the progam that you used to play with others?
I could beat it easily if I use xqlearner. |
|
x*****i
发帖数: 253 | 6 if u say xqlearnern beat it easily? u dunno
what ur talking abt.. xqlearner..
weaker than ZMBL and shiga and ELP.. how could you
even mention it with xxm in the same sentense? if
u mean the lower version or trial version of xxm,
i forgive you.
****
next time, if you state something to mislead others,
you will be banned.
****
(note, I posted the url to validate my statement)
remember one thing.. annual computer chess match
is the most reliable way to meature the software
strength.. in this case. |
|
x*****i
发帖数: 253 | 7 haha, please do not make up stuff when you argue with people:
1) i am not the author of xxm. so don't say "your software":)
2) i have *great* idea how people play movesky:) in fact i wrote
the first unix-based auto connector and Wu (the author of MRSJ)
enhanced it:)
boy.. when MRSJ/XXM and ELP run amok in movesky.. you probably
had no idea what that site was yet..
3) feel being attacked? i am sorry. you just should not have foolishly
said "xqlearner beat xxm easily"..
again.. inst |
|
d****n
发帖数: 102 | 8 again, you did not understand what I said before you argued. What I said is
that I could beat xiexie easily by using xqlearner, not the way that you
thought to use robot. Look back to previous posters before you talk more,even
for a self-claimed guru. Only stupid people to use robots there except some
authors to do test for their programs.
choose
the
one
before
not
you |
|
