s***n
发帖数: 821 | 1
I would say, it's those way too superficial thinking...
Think deeply if you really want to get something out of your thinking. |
|
J*******g
发帖数: 8775 | 2 "analyze,""reason," and "ponder," while others completed similar puzzles
with onlywords unrelated to thinking, such as "high" and "plane."
就好像说一个人不停的想聪明就说明这个人聪明，一个人想长短，快慢，这个人就不聪
明。
没有error bar,没有control，然后就开始blablabla....这些搞社会科学的人真该好好
受下自然科学的训练。
.
thinking
understanding
is
thinking |
|
y***i
发帖数: 11639 | 3 【 以下文字转载自 PathToTruth 俱乐部 】
发信人: yuuli (听，...听), 信区: PathToTruth
标 题: Re: AN INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jul 11 13:58:28 2009, 美东)
第二个重要段落：
It is useful to ask why the scientific method--now recognized, in its guise
of critical thinking, as so important to modern education that hundreds of
critical thinking programs exist in thousands of schools across the nation--
is so valuable for an individual to learn and practice. The reason is
because the scientific metho |
|
i*****a
发帖数: 7272 | 4 【 以下文字转载自 Parenting 讨论区 】
发信人: iseesea (WHATEVER), 信区: Parenting
标 题: THINKING, FAST AND SLOW (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 22 12:55:44 2014, 美东)
发信人: iseesea (WHATEVER), 信区: WebRadio
标 题: Re: [夏日阅读] THINKING, FAST AND SLOW
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 22 12:42:27 2014, 美东)
(1)
THINKING, FAST AND SLOW
by Daniel Kahneman
听不少人推荐过这本书，也了解到作者是2002 年诺贝尔经济学奖获得者， 大概其知道
这本书讲的是人们做决定的时候经常依赖直觉，经验，不经深思，从而有可能做出错误
的决定和判断。尽管书中有涉及到大量的经济学和心理学的研究结果，这本书本质上是
面向大众的畅销书，和前几年比较火的Malcom Gladwell 写的BLINK 一样，只不过这两
本书在对待直觉经验上，... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****i
发帖数: 399 | 5 【 以下文字转载自 Chinook 俱乐部 】
发信人: wavelets (thinking loud), 信区: Chinook
标 题: tim cook: i am thinking printers
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Aug 25 17:39:28 2011, 美东)
http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-apple-ceo-tim-cook-im-thin
New Apple CEO Tim Cook: 'I'm Thinking Printers'
08.25.11 Share
SAN FRANCISCO—Following the resignation of Apple founder Steve Jobs,
incoming CEO Tim Cook called a meeting of shareholders and members of the
press Thursday morning to announce that he envisioned printers as the
company... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*******y
发帖数: 864 | 6
my
I think the answer is that monkeys eventually think about the world, him or
his family and so forth. You toy do not think. In addition, your toy can not
even remember the place for recharging, and it do not have a goal for finding
the place recharging while traveling randomly. |
|
i*****t
发帖数: 220 | 7 i am going to graduate this summer but the job market is so bad and my
programming level is not high. so i am thinking to strength my ability in
DBA. my DBA's level: know SQL and the theory but did not finish a practical
project yet. do you think my idea to strength DBA reasonable, in three
months' summer break?
if yes, i have several problem there:
1. do i need to test for a certificate? which certificate do you think i
should get?
2. what DBA software i should learn, oracle or MS ex?
3. |
|
c*********n
发帖数: 128 | 8 Thinking in C++这本书怎么样啊？
以前写过一点C＋＋，学的时候用的是随便找的国内出的那种中文书（类似于什么“C＋
＋教程”啊之类的）。
最近准备重新把C＋＋好好修炼一下，把这本Thinking in C++（以前买的，一直没读）
找出来读，现在才读了一百多页，觉得写得整个儿一科普风格，完全不像给编程的人看
的教材。
正在考虑要不要换到去读The c++ programing language.
读过Thinking in C++的人觉得这本书怎么样？ |
|
c***d
发帖数: 996 | 9 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
chamberlain (PKU|PHY01|面朝大海|春暖花开) 于 (Fri Jun 22 12:39:12 2007) 提到:
Thinking in C++这本书怎么样啊？
以前写过一点C＋＋，学的时候用的是随便找的国内出的那种中文书（类似于什么“C＋
＋教程”啊之类的）。
最近准备重新把C＋＋好好修炼一下，把这本Thinking in C++（以前买的，一直没读）
找出来读，现在才读了一百多页，觉得写得整个儿一科普风格，完全不像给编程的人看
的教材。
正在考虑要不要换到去读The c++ programing language.
读过Thinking in C++的人觉得这本书怎么样？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
rodney (gotoAndPlay(0)) 于 (Fri Jun 22 12:42:20 2007) 提到:
不妨再去读The c++ programming language 100页就知道了。
☆───── |
|
t******a
发帖数: 408 | 10 完全理解有的同学有顾虑：
“我的YOG太长了”
“I may be too old to do USMLE"......
两年多前，我从零开始准备的时候，YOG-17year(从本科毕业算)
我觉得自己已经非常老了(但没有想会不会因为YOG而match不上)。
后来去NYC, step2 CS 辅导班，
刚到教室进门，最后一排坐着一位，印度老兄，头发半白了，
气定神闲地认真学习。
顿时觉得，其实自己没有那么老 ......
上周五，在一个医院面试内科的时候
(一个不错的university-affiliated community hospital)，
碰到一个一同面试的申请人(来自古巴)，和一个PGY2二年级内科住院医(来自土耳其)。
两人分别是1986, 1984年毕业。
You think you are too old for USMLE? Think again.
To me (maybe you too)， YOG is a NON-MODIFIABLE risk factor.
You cannot do anything about it.
Thus, forget i... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
w*****2
发帖数: 1584 | 12 我都不好意思往细讲，
邓亚萍这种一般专访，往往都是提前有访问提纲的，邓亚萍估计事先都背过台词了，无
赖基础太差，还会连续说出“i have to thinking”这类可笑的语法错误。
反正这个准剑桥博士（这个采访当时她好像还不是剑桥博士,这点我不太确定，我懒得
回看核实了），说出这个“i have to thinking”，是太那个了，我不好意思用“丢脸
”两个字，毕竟她曾是奥运冠军。 |
|
u**b
发帖数: 5366 | 13 要有critical thinking,首先要让说真话，真话都不让说，谈什么critical thinking? |
|
N******K
发帖数: 10202 | 14 lz的critical thinking=反共=真话
thinking? |
|
u**b
发帖数: 5366 | 15 从小党妈就告诉你，月亮是方的。你看见明明是圆的，也说是方的，能有什么思辨能力
？久而久之就对真相不敏感了，而只信书，以书本为统一标准。critical thinking第
一步就是认知真相。
thinking? |
|
s******r
发帖数: 2876 | 16 月亮不一定非圆即方。
从小党妈就告诉你，月亮是方的。你看见明明是圆的，也说是方的，能有什么思辨能力
？久而久之就对真相不敏感了，而只信书，以书本为统一标准。critical thinking第
一步就是认知真相。
thinking? |
|
u*****a
发帖数: 9489 | 17 教屁民critical thinking，你这等于是要割共产党的命根子啊
学生把政治课历史课上教的东西都critical think一遍，这洗脑还怎么洗啊？
土共最怕的两样：1.中国学生的批判性思维 2.中国公民的持枪权 |
|
c***T
发帖数: 4990 | 18 你妈什么时候告诉你月亮是方的的？
你觉得月亮是方的还是圆的？你怎么通过critical thinking得出月亮是圆是方的真像
的？
少扯鸡巴蛋。
你要 critical thinking 先想想3000W，血流成河的广场 和 老将到底是不是黄皮。
LOL |
|
X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 19
thinking?
但如果你的目的是讨论，研究，提高和应用 Critical Thinking 的能力，说假话绝对
有害。 |
|
X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 20
Thinking
Critical Thinking 是仆人，Empiricism 是主人。
“三论”是否真理，要看应用后的 Empirical Result。 |
|
t*******h
发帖数: 2744 | 21 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: thighhigh (Thigh High), 信区: USANews
标 题: "Make America great again? I think you wanna make America white again."
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 12 20:35:39 2016, 美东)
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/smaqtp/the-nightly-show-with-larr
WATCH MAC MILLER FRY DONALD TRUMP'S ENTIRE EXISTENCE ON 'THE NIGHTLY SHOW
WITH LARRY WILMORE'
Mac Miller was the special guest on Wednesday's edition of The Nightly Show
with Larry Wilmore on Comedy Central, and he came with a special purpose:
d... 阅读全帖 |
|
y********l
发帖数: 3970 | 22 鸡巴中国高校纯粹是误人子弟的地方。
The study, to be published next year, found that Chinese freshmen in
computer science and engineering programs began college with critical
thinking skills about two to three years ahead of their peers in the United
States and Russia. Those skills included the ability to identify assumptions
, test hypotheses and draw relationships between variables.
Yet Chinese students showed virtually no improvement in critical thinking
after two years of college, even as their American and R... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*****e
发帖数: 129 | 23 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2016/09/27/
daily-202-why-even-republicans-think-clinton-won-the-first-debate/
57e9b033e9b69b3019a1e037/
The Daily 202: Why even Republicans think Clinton won the first debate
THE BIG IDEA: The consensus that Donald Trump badly lost the first debate
gelled overnight. Liberals predictably panned the GOP nominee’s performance
on Long Island, but some of the harshest reviews are coming from
conservative thought leaders who had been star... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
w*********a
发帖数: 9279 | 25 critical thinking是应该在大学重点培养的东西，教你怎么在社会上，科学的前沿分
析不同来源的信息，不被社会上真真假假的信息所误导，坚持自己的探索。相信根据，
相信证据。GRE考试里都有critical writing. argument writing。 可见对此的重视。
中国教育也有critical thinking的教育，不过是在小学二年级。 有一篇课文叫做小马
过河。“小马想过河。松鼠说，水太深了，进去就淹死。 大象说，水太浅，刚过脚面
。”，之后都是要求你服从。 中国研究生考试还考你政治。你思想上不服从，剥夺你
受教育的机会。
中国的问题是，在小学教大学该教的东西。 在大学反而才教小学生该有的常识。 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 26 郭文贵那不叫critical thinking
有critical thinking的人根本不会听郭文贵 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 27 恰恰就是没有critical thinking，才看不上郭文贵。郭文贵把中共的统治之术讲的活
灵活现，对于理解中共的权力运作有很重要的参考，但是因为你没有critical
thinking，你只听到了郭文贵逗你们吃瓜群众时吹的牛，却没有听到郭文贵所说的信息
，你们宁愿看轮子胡编乱造的中共新闻，也不会参考郭文贵所说的。
郭文贵说提到的北大方正、李友的纠纷、胡舒立写的权力猎手、贺国强与周永康之间的
权力斗争、马健张越、纪委和公安的办案，以及其公布的傅要求他帮助习老大调查王岐
山外甥与陈峰王健的商业来往的录音，都是有分量的东西。 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 28 Arrogant Democrats Think They Have Role to ‘Protect’ Titanic Wreck Site
April 15, 2012 |
by Warner Todd Huston
The Titanic sunk 100 years ago this year. The great ship went down in
international waters as a vessel of British registry. When it went down the
United States was barely a presence on the international stage. Yet now, 100
years later, American Democrats imagine they have the duty and power to
control what will happen at the final resting place of over 1,500 passengers.
In their arrogan... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 29 By Kim Zigfeld
Watch out, Mr. and Mrs. America: Spanish celebrity chef José Andrés and
the New York Times are worried about what you have been eating, and they
intend to make you change your evil ways. Luckily for you, however, Andrés
is yet one more ignorant European, utterly clueless about American politics
and values, so his efforts will prove futile and helpless.
According to the NYT, Andrés "wonders why the most powerful country in the
world won't spend money to help the poor eat better." ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 30 Another Obama Victory: 45% Think U.S.-Muslim Relations Worse Than Four Years
Ago
by Jammie
Remember when our moral superiors said the world would love us once Obama
was in office? Yeah, about that.
President Obama in June 2009 in one of his first major foreign policy
initiatives delivered a highly publicized speech in Cairo reaching out to
Muslims worldwide after the conflict of the Bush years. But only 18% of
Likely U.S. Voters think U.S. relations with the Islamic world are better
now than... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 31 It is not just a few GOP think that way. Many of them think that way.
Otherwise, the guy will get no vote. |
|
|
|
d**e
发帖数: 1124 | 34 no offense, but no one with proper English would say "I think Trump won't
win". The correct way to say this is: "I don't think Trump will win"
学好英语再用英语发言，好吗 |
|
m*****o
发帖数: 1464 | 35 他指出的这个是对的。美式英语比较追求简洁。比如don't think sth > think sth wo
n't, 再比如 I am unable to > I am not able to |
|
b*******m
发帖数: 5492 | 36 还要control how the people think, how deep the people think. 哈哈 |
|
S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 37 CNN真尼玛奇葩呀，不但有WH的source， 而且a source with direct knowledge of
the White House's thinking。原来川总是CNN的source。
Washington (CNN)Reports that the White House has a tentative plan to replace
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that emerged Thursday were an effort to
express President Donald Trump's deep displeasure and publicly shame his
secretary of state, a source with direct knowledge of the White House's
thinking said Thursday.
The hope from the White House, the source said, is to push out the plan to
re... 阅读全帖 |
|
s********n
发帖数: 1962 | 38 【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: badcompany (bad), 信区: Stock
标 题: re ibeyond: Why I think stagflation talk unrealistic.
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 19 03:08:13 2008)
ibeyond, your discussion about the inflation threat has been very good,
however, I don't agree with your argument that recent years are comparable
with 1970 and we could have a stagflation. Of course if we are going to have
a stagflation then stock market will be slaughtered. However, I think the
chance of this scenario is very small.
The ri |
|
s********n
发帖数: 1962 | 39 The top might have passed. Whatever you do, don't buy dip.
I am not sure if it can be pulled up back to 1070 or not in the next
week, but I think a major correction is finally here.
If it is what I think it is, 950 is an easy target, and we might be
looking at 900. Cannot predict what will happen after that though. |
|
M********r
发帖数: 278 | 40 http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/05/thinking-about-inte
Krugman wrote about the phenomenon that US treasury yields lower than german
bund and other european bonds. He thinks the reason is two fold. A. the
expectation that dollar will fall against euro in the long term. B.
inflation in US is currently higher than europe such that the yield gap in
real term is smaller than that the nominal would suggest.
Agree with him or not, the article is very clear and concise. The takeaway
in terms o... 阅读全帖 |
|
b******x
发帖数: 826 | 41 【 以下文字转载自 CS 讨论区 】
发信人: bbcsrgsx (七星汪汪), 信区: CS
标 题: What do you think of open AI?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 26 10:47:35 2016, 美东)
Sorry for not being able to use Chinese input at work.
Do you think this organization is going to last long? Is it going to be a
real research lab? Has any one contacted them for job opportunities? |
|
h****a
发帖数: 628 | 42 Thanks for this info. It is very knowledgeable.
Do you think it is ok if the radon remediation works well. Or do you think I
should walk away.
Thx
as
normal
and |
|
w*********e
发帖数: 383 | 43 No. I don't think she is selfish. I don't think it's a matter of selfishness
or selflessness. It's a matter of taking life's bitterness head on or
swerving around in seeking a better life (as far as we could see at the time)
for ourselves. There is no fault in either, and both require courage and
wisdom.
There are so many inspirational people with birth defects out there. We all
know Hellen Keller. I recently found out about a professional storyteller
with a facial disfigurement, David Roche: ht... 阅读全帖 |
|
i*****a
发帖数: 7272 | 44 【 以下文字转载自 WebRadio 讨论区 】
发信人: iseesea (WHATEVER), 信区: WebRadio
标 题: Re: [夏日阅读] THINKING, FAST AND SLOW
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 22 12:42:27 2014, 美东)
(1)
THINKING, FAST AND SLOW
by Daniel Kahneman
听不少人推荐过这本书，也了解到作者是2002 年诺贝尔经济学奖获得者， 大概其知道
这本书讲的是人们做决定的时候经常依赖直觉，经验，不经深思，从而有可能做出错误
的决定和判断。尽管书中有涉及到大量的经济学和心理学的研究结果，这本书本质上是
面向大众的畅销书，和前几年比较火的Malcom Gladwell 写的BLINK 一样，只不过这两
本书在对待直觉经验上，一个持怀疑态度，一个大力推崇。
如果你的时间有限，如果你像我在看书之前一样认为这是人尽皆知的常识，如果你有信
心自己在做人生决定的时候包括在工作中要求做出判断的时候深思熟虑，并且极少出错
，那我觉得你可以把时间用在更需要的地方。
如果你像我一... 阅读全帖 |
|
i*****a
发帖数: 7272 | 45 再来回复你的问题。也仅仅是谈一下自己的理解，做个讨论，看本书还不能让我就成了
权威。：)
首先，很多领域，很难量化甚至无法量化。这个作者是同意并且有提及的。比如股市，
就是他举的一个难预测难量化的例子。他曾经应邀分析过一个公司过去二十年业绩最好
的基金操盘手
，发现他们performance完全不consistent，完全随机，和你那个猩猩的例子差不多。
这个例子被用来说明在有些领域，专家的经验，不管他们用什么数据倒腾什么模型，
都是没用的。
那专家的经验在什么时候会有用呢，在判断能得出立刻反馈的领域，比如说围棋，判断
是否准确输赢能马上告知。或者消防员，判断是否准确，火有没有被灭掉花多长时间被
灭掉能马上反馈，在这些领域，专家意见是值得重视的。
整本书大量强调think statistically, 但作者绝对没有依靠数据完全能让人做出正确
决定
的意思。首先运用数据做决策不同于他讲的think statistically. 后者强调同样类型
的project要放在大环境比较其可行性。光是自己拿着数据跑，只从*一个*project里分
析决定的可行性，让人容易倾向得出过于乐观鲁莽的结... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*******r
发帖数: 22634 | 46 I respectfully disagree your opinion.
The reason is, all our fundamental questions for elementary
school kids, require certain level of critical thinking. e.g.
"The sense of purpose" and "The meaning of life":
Stephen Hawking's Grand Design: The Meaning of Life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGUCFCy3hTE
Even in our elementary school arithmetic, it also require
certain level of critical thinking. As we all know our
elementary school arithmetic is merely one of the many
possible formal systems, so... 阅读全帖 |
|
A***u
发帖数: 3714 | 47 我觉得，环境对大众thinking pattern 应该很关键，否则洗脑成功不了。。
个体来说，
其实nonlinearized thinking 非常重要，但是我认为应该是不可训的，是天生的。
Linear vs non-linear 其实也都是度的问题，不好说。。。。。 |
|
