a******n
发帖数: 166 | 1 我2013年9月来美，到2013年年底不足183天，但是到2014年3月下旬就能到183天，这时
候是不是就能通过Substantial Presence Test了？（之前的2012，2011，2010年都没
到过美国）。
还是，按照下面这个例子计算183天：1/3 2013年的天数 + 2014年的天数。 这样的话
到4月15日我就不能通过Substantial Presence Test，只能file extension啦？
Example:
You were physically present in the United States on 120 days in each of the
years 2010, 2011, and 2012. To determine if you meet the substantial
presence test for 2012, count the full 120 days of presence in 2012, 40 days
in 2011 (1/3 of 120), and 20 days in 2010 (1/6 of ... 阅读全帖 |
|
N*S
发帖数: 783 | 2 有些基金不给已经有substantial support的申请人，那么多少算是substantial呢？
startup算不算呢？可不可以不在申请材料里面提呢？ |
|
发帖数: 1 | 3 新手上路，最近收到一个RFP，想投，但是看见一句Proposals submitted in response
to this solicitation may not duplicate or be substantially similar to other
proposals concurrently under consideration by NSF or NIH programs
想请问一下什么叫substantially similar。
比如投一个proposal里写要搞某个算法应用到医疗上，同时投一个proposal写要搞个几
乎一样的算法应用到地质上？或者一个大proposal中的某个aim抽出来同时投个小
proposal？
另外我看有的NSF RFP里写不能同时投NIH，有的NSF RFP里写不能同时投NIH和NXXXX。
是说如果没明确指明funding agency，就可以同时投？
谢过先 |
|
t******y
发帖数: 526 | 4 J1签证的时候，所有的天数都不计算吗？按照这个说法岂不是J1前5年都是non-
resident?
Substantial Presence Test 2009
To meet Substantial Presence Test 2009, you must Physically present in the
United States on atleast::
1. 31 days during the current year 2009.
2. and 183 days during the 3-year period that includes the current year
2009 and the 2008 and 2007, counting:
* All the days you were present in the current year 2009, plus
* 1/3 of the days you were present in the year 2008, plus
* 1/6 of |
|
O*****e
发帖数: 359 | 5 2009年F1入美
2011.06 由F1转F1-OPT,2011-10转H1B
看版上说是NZ
但1040NR-EZ的Instruction 说
Substantial Presence Test
You are considered as a US Resistent if you meet the substantial presence
test for 2011. You meet this if you physically present in the United States
for at least
1. 31 days during 2011, and
2. 183 days during the period 2011,2010 and 2009
Confusing!
Thanks |
|
q*********a
发帖数: 178 | 6 Review是routine是被NOID/RFE的常见理由，如果你只有review,没有其他的花样，你必
须要证明你的review是substantial的，究竟多少算substantial似乎没有定论.我通读
所有AAO case,只有1个case提到“more than two dozen”：
The beneficiary has participated extensively in the peer-review process
as of the petition's filing date, having reviewed more than two dozen papers
submitted to multiple journals.
所以如果你有30个review多个journal,就应该ok.要回复NOID/RFE,实在不得以的话，可
以引用这个AAO case：
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B3%20-%20Outstanding%20Professors%20an |
|
w*********m
发帖数: 64 | 7 Mini - I understand if this comment ends up on the CRF since I am unable to
substantiate the following info without implicating the key person/people I
learned it from. Post (or delete) as you believe is appropriate.
If it is posted, then you readers can accept or deny as you wish. But I know
the following to be true, so am sharing for your consideration.
Substantial layoffs coming at the start of the new fiscal year (early July).
The targets are spread company wide, with the eliminated headcoun |
|
t*****9
发帖数: 10416 | 8 The U.S. has come to a “very substantial phase one deal” with China in the
high-stakes trade negotiations between the two economic superpowers,
President Donald Trump said Friday.
估计和日本 deal 一样, 日本承诺开放农产品市场, 但是美国进口日本汽车还没有开
始谈 |
|
a**********y
发帖数: 2367 | 9 It looks like all folks have 2+ years of prelim. work that went into the
proposals, but I do see a lot of funded proposals without substantial prelim
. work. How do I know if a proposal failed because it lacks prelim. work? |
|
w****l
发帖数: 6122 | 10 【No indication of substantial rally in the future】
Forex, commodity and treasury all show no significant signs for a stock
market rally, but I have a strong hunch of possible government intervention
from Western countries. |
|
m***p
发帖数: 3 | 11 下面是学校网站上面的关于opt缴税的说明：
F-1 students authorized for practical training employment are subject to all
other taxes that may apply: federal, state, and local. However, you may be
able to treat the entire period of practical training as an extended
business trip and substantially reduce your federal taxes by deducing "
travel expenses" (amounts for food, housing and transportation) from your
income. (You should consult an accountant or tax attorney for more
information about this second provision of t |
|
j*****g
发帖数: 774 | 12 我０７年６月３日F1入境，０８与０９年未离境。如果今年报税，
是否满足Substantial Presence? |
|
s******e
发帖数: 252 | 13 11年中来美，按照substantial presence test肯定满足183天的要求，但因为J1前三年
免税，所以还是nonresident alien?
如果按照resident alien处理的话可以有EIC的credit（孩子去年在这里出生），还是
很可观的。
所以，non还是不non？ |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 14 不是。Teachers and trainees前两个日历年是nonresident。所以你2012年（第二年）
还是nonresident。Teachers and trainees前两个日历年是exempt from Substantial
Presence Test的. |
|
a**s
发帖数: 1892 | 15 IRS要求补8812,按那个公司算是满183天的，但是提示最后有个要求，
For 2012, did your dependent have a tax home in a foreign
country and a closer connection to that country than to the
United States?
1 Despite meeting the substantial presence test, your dependent may still be
considered a nonresident alien under an income tax treaty between the U.S.
and your country. Check the provisions of the treaty carefully.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~请问这在哪里查？谢谢！
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040s8.pdf |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 16 你说这些的意思是不是想用First-Year Choice在2013年上，所以需要先通过2014年的
Substantial Presence Test？
the
days
for |
|
|
T****5
发帖数: 48 | 18 情况：F1 OPT VISA 工作1-10月 2017年；然后换成H1B VISA 11-12月，F1仍在五年内
。不满足substantial presence test, 使用1040NR file, 1040NR Page 5已经包含
treaty部分，无需额外FORM 8833. 经过报税人员确认，希望对大家有帮助。出处：IRS
官网
You need not include Form 8833 with Form 1040NR to claim treaty benefits
under the United States-China Income Tax Treaty Article 20.
Per the Instructions for Form 1040NR, if a taxpayer takes the position that
a treaty of the United States overrides or modifies any provision of the
Internal Revenue Code (such as the Chinese ... 阅读全帖 |
|
w**********t
发帖数: 116 | 19 刚听印度同事说的
AILA has reported that the EB-2 cut-off dates in Visa Bulletin in May 2011
may progress ahead substantially because of large unused EB-1 numbers since
October 2010 since it has about 12,000 unused EB-2 numbers. |
|
发帖数: 1 | 20 请问EB1A里面需不需要证明ENTRY TO THE UNITED STATES WILL SUBSTANTIALLY
BENEFIT PROSPECTIVELY THE UNITED STATES一项？ |
|
zg
发帖数: 113 | 21 From http://www.immigration-law.com/
AILA has reported that the EB-2 cut-off dates in Visa Bulletin in May 2011
may progress ahead substantially because of large unused EB-1 numbers since
October 2010 since it has about 12,000 unused EB-2 numbers. Very good news
from AILA and Mr. Oppenheim. |
|
zg
发帖数: 113 | 22 For May, the move might be substantial for EB2I, considering they have not
moved one single day. For EB2C, it might still be one or two weeks. |
|
D******e
发帖数: 1222 | 23 How substantial it would be? One month for EB2C?
since |
|
l****w
发帖数: 27 | 24 Tackle the Gordian Knot
---------------- How to Substantiate the Claim that Labor Certification
Shall not be Required in an NIW Case
The three-prong test specified by the Administrative Appeals Unit in NYSDOT
is always the touchstone in an NIW petition. And its third prong – “
evidence submitted shall prove that national interest would be adversely
affected if a labor certification were required” – has been the pain of
pains at all times. We hope that this a |
|
a***o
发帖数: 54 | 25 http://kidjacked.com/legal/spanking_law.asp
Alabama
[The Code of Alabama 1975]
Parent/guardian/person responsible for care and supervision of a minor/
teacher or other person responsible for care and supervision of a minor for
a special purpose may use reasonable and appropriate physical force when and
to the extent he reasonably believes it necessary and appropriate to
maintain discipline or promote welfare of the child.
§ 13A-3-24. [Criminal Code]
[See also: Endangering welfare of child. Secti... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*********r
发帖数: 2 | 26 Alabama
[The Code of Alabama 1975]
Parent/guardian/person responsible for care and supervision of a minor/
teacher or other person responsible for care and supervision of a minor for
a special purpose may use reasonable and appropriate physical force when and
to the extent he reasonably believes it necessary and appropriate to
maintain discipline or promote welfare of the child.
§ 13A-3-24. [Criminal Code]
[See also: Endangering welfare of child. Section 13A-13-6]
Alaska
[Alaska Statutes]
When a... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********n
发帖数: 2314 | 27 Spanking Laws
State by State — United States statutes as they pertaining to spanking and
child abuse.
Editors Note: This page is continually being updated. This information has
been posted here in order to allow parents to read the state statutes for
themselves and find other pertinent code sections. I could use some help. If
you have the time, please look up the code for your state and e-mail them
to me, I'll add them as soon as they come in. Thanks for any help you can
offer!
Select your state... 阅读全帖 |
|
R*N
发帖数: 2173 | 28 The law imposes penalties to ensure that all taxpayers pay their taxes. Some
of these penalties are discussed below. If you underpay your tax due to
fraud, you may be subject to a civil fraud penalty. In certain cases, you
may be subject to criminal prosecution.
Background Information on IRS Tax Penalty
This information is intended as technical information of use to consultants
and individuals doing research. For information on tax assistance, click
here.
Scroll Down for Quick Reference ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l**********t
发帖数: 5754 | 29 chapter 4.3 Temptation And Failure, The Challenge To Faith
For us, then, the two greatest facts in history are these: that all our
sins are dealt with by the Blood, and that we ourselves are dealt with
by the Cross. But what now of the matter of temptation? What is to be
our attitude when, after we have seen and believed these facts, we
discover the old desires rising up again? Worse still, what if we fall
once more into known sin? What if we lose our temper, or worse? Is the
w... 阅读全帖 |
|
l**********t
发帖数: 5754 | 30 chapter 4.3 Temptation And Failure, The Challenge To Faith
For us, then, the two greatest facts in history are these: that all our
sins are dealt with by the Blood, and that we ourselves are dealt with
by the Cross. But what now of the matter of temptation? What is to be
our attitude when, after we have seen and believed these facts, we
discover the old desires rising up again? Worse still, what if we fall
once more into known sin? What if we lose our temper, or worse? Is the
w... 阅读全帖 |
|
z**********g
发帖数: 16 | 31 bout “Repulsive particle” hypothesis
Zhuang Yilong
Shanghai Institute of Science and Technology Managemen
Jiading 201800
“Repulsive particle” hypothesis is a new theory of material
action. Contrary to Newton law of universal gravitation, which explains why
an apple on the three falls to the ground, it can be called law of universal
repulsion which explains why an apple grows on the tree. It regards a plank
quantum as a material particle, which is a epulsive particle”
counter... 阅读全帖 |
|
z**********g
发帖数: 16 | 32 Repulsion Particle Hypothesis
: Zhuang Yilong
Shanghai Institute of Science & Technology Management
Jiading District of Shanghai, 201800, China
Abstract: The theory of “ Repulsion Particle Hypothesis” is a new theory
of matter interactions. In contrast to Newtons universal gravitation that
the apple drops from the tree, this hypothesis can be called the universal
repulsion theory tha... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**d
发帖数: 768 | 33 这是一本计算神经科学的优秀著作，全文拷贝这里（图和公式缺），有兴趣的同学可以
阅读
如需要，我可以分享PDF文件（－－仅供个人学习，无商业用途）
From Computer to Brain
William W. Lytton
From Computer to Brain
Foundations of Computational Neuroscience
Springer
William W. Lytton, M.D.
Associate Professor, State University of New York, Downstato, Brooklyn, NY
Visiting Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Visiting Associate Professor, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Staff Neurologist., Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, NY
In From Computer to Brain: ... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**********8
发帖数: 25265 | 34 510K
Premarket Notification (510k)
Introduction
What is Substantial Equivalence
Who is Required to Submit a 510(k)
When a 510(k) is Required
When a 510(k) is not Required
Third Party Review Program
Introduction
Each person who wants to market in the U.S., a Class I, II, and III device
intended for human use, for which a Premarket Approval (PMA) is not required
, must submit a 510(k) to FDA unless the device is exempt from 510(k)
requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) ... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**********8
发帖数: 25265 | 35 Overview of FDA Modernization Act of 1997, Medical Device Provisions
CDRH FDA Modernization Act of 1997 Page1
Foreword
Preface
Introduction
Investigational Device Exemptions
Premarket Approval
Premarket Notification [510(k)]
Device Classification
Device Labeling
Device Tracking
Postmarketing Surveillance
Global Harmonization
Medical Device Reporting and Recall Reports
Establishment Registration
Device Standards
Other Sections Related to Medical Devices
Foreword
The Center for Devices and Radiolo... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******l
发帖数: 2495 | 36 http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon_3687_152251.html
绿卡申请信模板七: EB2 NIW I-140 petition letter sample
http://www.mitbbs.com/pc/pccon_3687_152251.html
作者：qiaka
发表时间：2011-01-12
更新时间：2011-01-12
浏览：1721次
评论：0篇
地址：128.206.
::: 栏目 :::
下面是一封申请EB2 NIW I-140的petition letter的范例。这是多年前公开发表在
MITBBS“落地生根”版上的一个帖子。现在重贴于此，供大家参考。
个人点评：EB2 NIW的申请是技术活，满足NIW的三个方面都必须论证到位，否则就通过
不了；而且论证过程中，有些关键词必须出现在移民官的视野里。这封petition
letter基本上达到了这几方面的要求。更难能可贵的是，这封petition letter的后面
，还列出了所有的exhibit，值得参考。
----------------------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****y
发帖数: 80 | 37 由于本人的case比较弱，所以现在是EB1A 跟NIW 一起准备着。已经差不多写好了EB1A
的petition letter，开始准备NIW。看了几篇模板，发现有些疑问。
1. NIW 不需要列表格，油灯图等吗？为什么我看到的模板都没有这些，只有Exhibit？
2. EB1A的petition条理比较清楚，比方说我要claim三项，就从1，2，3几方面阐述。
但是NIW怎么感觉条理比较混乱呀？
请有经验的前辈指点迷津，小女子不胜感激！
同时附上我参考的NIW的petition：
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Citizenship and Immigration Services
RE: EB-2 Petition for Permanent Residency with request for a National
Interest Waiver
Petitioner/Beneficiary: Dr. Xx Xx
Classification Sought: 203(b)(2) NIW
... 阅读全帖 |
|
I*D
发帖数: 40035 | 38 Role Title Description Start Date End Date Status Level From
Level To Standard Role Work Location Role Specialty 1 Level 1
Role Specialty 1 Level 2 Role Specialty 1 Level 3 Role Specialty 1
Level 4 Role Specialty 1 Level 5 Skill & Proficiency
PeopleSoft Administrator This person will be part of a team that supports
a PeopleSoft Financial system with several associated custom applications
and batches using ASP .NET, Hyperion, PL/SQL, SQL, and SQR. This ... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*******e
发帖数: 1093 | 39 来自主题: TrustInJesus版 - 想问些问题 第二个问题：什么是信
〖 信的定义 〗
现在我们要来看什么是信？全本圣经里最重要的乃是信。但我们的信也许不是圣经
所说的信。新旧约里，说到信的地方有数百处，但唯一给信下定义的是希伯来书十一章
一节。这节圣经说，「信就是所望之事的实底，是未见之事的确据。」「实底」译得不
对，在希腊文里并不是名词，乃是由动词转变的名词，就是英文的substantiating。比
方监督，乃是动词变成名词。英文本圣经普通都译为substance(质)，只有达秘(Darby)
译为substantiating。在中文里我们找不到适合的字来表达。
比方，我们是物质的人，我们如何与物质的世界接触呢？我们乃是用五官接触这物
质的世界。人如果缺了五官，就不能知道这物质的世界。这世界满了形形色色的物质，
各有其光暗、颜色、形状。而这各种物质，乃是藉着我们身上的眼睛表明出来，传到我
们里面，我们才知道有世界上的各种物质。颜色本来在人的外面，人乃是藉着眼睛，将
外面东西的颜色传到人里面。颜色就是圣经所说的「质」。眼睛将东西之颜色的质彰显
出来；同样的，信心将属灵世界的「质」彰显出来。你如果对瞎眼的人说到颜色，世界
上固然有... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*******7
发帖数: 6300 | 40 信的定义
=======
现在我们要来看什么是信？全本圣经里最重要的乃是信。但我们的信也许不是圣经
所说的信。新旧约里，说到信的地方有数百处，但唯一给信下定义的是希伯来书十一章
一节。这节圣经说，「信就是所望之事的实底，是未见之事的确据。」「实底」译得不
对，在希腊文里并不是名词，乃是由动词转变的名词，就是英文的substantiating。比
方监督，乃是动词变成名词。英文本圣经普通都译为substance(质)，只有达秘(Darby)
译为substantiating。在中文里我们找不到适合的字来表达。
比方，我们是物质的人，我们如何与物质的世界接触呢？我们乃是用五官接触这物
质的世界。人如果缺了五官，就不能知道这物质的世界。这世界满了形形色色的物质，
各有其光暗、颜色、形状。而这各种物质，乃是藉着我们身上的眼睛表明出来，传到我
们里面，我们才知道有世界上的各种物质。颜色本来在人的外面，人乃是藉着眼睛，将
外面东西的颜色传到人里面。颜色就是圣经所说的「质」。眼睛将东西之颜色的质彰显
出来；同样的，信心将属灵世界的「质」彰显出来。你如果对瞎眼的人说到颜色，世界
上固然有各种的颜色，但... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****0
发帖数: 277 | 41 读了好几遍了，没看到哪里说他们是substantially identical ，原文如下：
Substantially identical. In determining
whether stock or securities are substantially
identical, you must consider all the facts and
circumstances in your particular case. Ordinarily,
stocks or securities of one corporation are
not considered substantially identical to stocks
or securities of another corporation. However,
they may be substantially identical in some cases.
For example, in a reorganization, the
stocks and securities of the predecesso... 阅读全帖 |
|
r******s
发帖数: 925 | 42 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 13:55:21 2011, 美东) 提到:
补充一下背景：
美国phD，毕业后在美国top牛小薄厚，已经两年了。递EB1a的时候是薄厚一年半的事。
那时候文章7，第一作者的只有2，没有CNS文章，citation是逐年增加的（当时是80多吧）
claim publication, contribution, media都承认了
review没有claim，因为当时只有10左右吧，结果也承认了。
推荐信6封。
总的来说我毕业时间不长，文章数目有限，case算弱的。所以totality上不知道具体该怎么加强。现在citation和review
的数目都有增加，还有一片挂名的CNS文章投了很可能会发（当然无法在30天内发出来）。但既然claim的都已经承
认，我是不是就不该再纠缠这些了？记得以前看人说凡认可的表示感谢就好了，多说还多错。
除了再厚脸皮找人写推荐信吹自己top ％（不知道能不能找到人写这种信），也想不到其他了。非常希望得到... 阅读全帖 |
|
z****l
发帖数: 5282 | 43 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
pettybaby (早日毕业) 于 (Sat Jan 1 01:52:43 2011, 美东) 提到:
最近在版上发了很多信用卡，cs，shopper的帖子，不过跳出来看，那些都是小家子。
我觉得要真正省钱，甚至生钱还是要靠缴税还有投资方面的。不过这方面我是白痴，比
如，我感兴趣的有：
（1）缴税方面
Non-resident（如俺这样穷学生）和Resident（绿卡们）在那几个方面可以合法地少缴税？如何利用各种每年的Tax Deduction？我知道很多deduction是use it or lose it，比如那个IRA每年几千什么的。所以这么多机会不用太浪费了。还比如用morgage抵税，charity什么的。
(2)投资方面
各位如何看待现在的股市还有房市啊？在其中的和不在其中的，各位对未来走向怎么看啊？我是挺看好未来一年的股市的，应该比存CD甚至麻烦的rewards checking盈利多。不过新手入市需要注意什么吗？
总之，各位过来人分享一下你们的经验吧。俺知道很多问题挺复杂，就给... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*********a
发帖数: 225 | 44 pub(501)里规定了：you cannot claim a person as a dependent unless that
person is a U.S. citizen, U.S. resident alien, U.S. national, or a resident
of Canada or Mexico.
183天是把taxable resident和dependent exemption 的qualifcation搞混了。１８３
天的substantial test是用来qualify taxable resident。
B2旅游探亲的父母不是taxpayer， 不能用这个表http://www.irs.gov/publications/p519/15023t02.gif-393490125.html
除此之外，A person meeting the above relationship test cannot be claimed as
a qualifying relative if he or she had gross income for the tax... 阅读全帖 |
|
G******i
发帖数: 5226 | 45 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
flag (为了饿一只苍蝇我把自己饿得够呛) 于 (Fri Jun 3 21:29:12 2011, 美东) 提到:
本人文科在读PhD，最近有可能拿到一个纽约州（不在纽约市）的教育类工作，50K，和
版上的牛offer没法儿比了，很惭愧。
但我还挺喜欢这份工作的，所以打算用CPT先工作一年，然后放弃F1身份转H1（单位答
应sponsor），再part time读完现在的PhD(因为已经上完必须的课程了，只剩下写论文
），各位觉得这个计划可行吗？
50K的话，不知道税后能拿到多少呢？我的情况是老婆F2，孩子年底出生，希望够一家
人生活。
谢谢各位！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
flag (为了饿一只苍蝇我把自己饿得够呛) 于 (Fri Jun 3 21:57:29 2011, 美东) 提到:
这么惨，没人看也没人回？！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
city (city) 于... 阅读全帖 |
|
s****n
发帖数: 4902 | 46 For 2012, you have an option to file Form 1040 as a dual-status resident.
You need to wait until you meet the substantial presence test for 2013
though.
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p519/ch01.html#en_US_2012_publi
First-Year Choice
If you do not meet either the green card test or the substantial presence
test for 2011 or 2012 and you did not choose to be treated as a resident for
part of 2011, but you meet the substantial presence test for 2013, you can
choose to be treated as a U.S. resident... 阅读全帖 |
|
m******3
发帖数: 263 | 47 wildThing， 不能这么算吗？我怎么看这个条款都是这么说的啊？连例子都有。 而且
甚至在最后一段还提到在第二年的4月15 还不够183天， 还可以推延报税日期到meet
183天以后再报啊？
http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Residenc
Residency Starting Date under the First-Year Choice
If you do not meet either the green card test or the substantial presence
test for the current year (for example, 2012) or the prior year (2011), and
you did not choose to be treated as a U.S. resident for part of the prior
year (2011), but you meet the substantial presence test in th... 阅读全帖 |
|
y**a
发帖数: 38 | 48 上周LD的I-140通过了（PP无RFE），情况比较复杂（http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/31992773.html）。I-485刚刚寄出，请大家bless我们和LD的工作签证。
贡献出PL模板（注：模板借鉴了版上的经典贴，更新的是用了两步法），感谢大家。
Dear USCIS Officer:
This application package is respectfully submitted for Dr. X petition in the
category of employment-based first preference, as an alien of extraordinary
ability in science, under §203(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act. Dr. X has sustained international acclaim in XXX, and satisfies at
least 3 out of the 10... 阅读全帖 |
|
I*****A
发帖数: 52 | 49 为了答谢April妹妹，我把我的PL传在这里了。也为我的485申请攒人品。其实我的PL是
完全照抄Aprilmm的。因为我是两个小孩的妈，还要上班，根本没时间搞绿卡申请，3月
20多号的时候，我要到一个地方开会3天，我就把April mm和版上另外一个人的PL打印
出来，带去开会了。除了我present那天，我就在旅馆写这个了。完全是以April mm的
做模版。同时给几个人发要推荐信，我的两个老板的，是我自己写好，他们签名的，两
个独立推荐人是他们自己写的。这里也感谢他们很快的回复，现在一看，我3月24号完
成的PL,4月6号就submit了，非常感谢他们！
先说明一下我的背景
EB1A 140
RD: 2011/04/06
AD: 2011/09/29
我claim三样:authorship,contribution,published material about alien.
1.文章7篇，不好意思，刚发现有两篇是2作者，不是全都是一作者
2.有4篇别人写的review文章引用了我的工作。
3.我的文章引用20左右
还有就是回答大家发给我的一些问题：
1.问我的专业，生物。
2... 阅读全帖 |
|
p******g
发帖数: 94 | 50 拿到绿卡几个月了，贴出来和大家分享一下，另外我也夹带了一点点私货，宣传了一下
自己工作之余做的网站，斑竹如果觉得不合适我改下，大家要是觉得有用，去facebook
like/share一下我的page（facebook.com/scienceprinting）感激不尽，当然要是能
在我网站上印点啥，不仅要热泪盈眶了。
(Please insert your letterhead.)
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Re: Second Preference National Interest Waiver Petition for Dr. (
scienceprinting.com)
Dear Sir/Madam:
I am writing this letter in support of Dr. (scienceprinting.com)’s
application for an Immigrant Visa of the United States under category of
National Interest W... 阅读全帖 |
|
