c*******h
发帖数: 72 | 1 是IRA account上的Beneficiary, 有这样的两个选项和如下解释
You may select either per stirpes (or "By rights of representation") or per
capita next to each name if you wish the children of a beneficiary that
predeceases you to receive a share of this account.
这两个选项什么意思啊？该如何选？我的Agent的解释和wiki上解释完全相反。谢谢！ |
|
c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 2 This may sound complicated, but it's easier to understand if you draw a tree
diagram.
Suppose you have two children, A and B. Suppose A has 2 children, X and Y,
and B has 1 child, Z.
Suppose further that when you die, both A and B are dead, too.
Under per capita: X, Y, and Z each gets 1/3.
Under per stirpes: X and Y each gets 1/4 (because they get 1/2 through A),
and Z gets 1/2. |
|
c*******h
发帖数: 72 | 3 几点疑问
1.在Primary Beneficiary条款原文如下：
In the event of my death, pay the full value of my IRA (in equal proportions
in the case of multiple beneficiaries unless otherwise indicated) to the
Primary Beneficiary listed below. I understand that if a primary beneficiary
predeceases me, his or her share will be divided equally among all
surviving primary beneficiaries. You may select either per stirpes (or "by
rights of respresentation") or per capita next to each name if you wish the
children of a benefi |
|
h******i
发帖数: 661 | 4 你们学校ap能发这么多paper?
1989
Cosmological implications of quasar-galaxy associations, L.Z.Fang, Y.Q.Chu
and X.F. Zhu, Mod. Phys. Lett., 4, 887.
Geometrical optics in an inhomogeneous universe, L.Z.Fang and X.P.Wu,
Chinese Phys. Lett., 6, 233.
Quasar clustering and its cosmological implication, L.Z.Fang, Inter. J. Mod.
Phys. A4, 3477.
L'Osservatorio astronomico di Pechino: la sua storia, il presente, L.Z.Fang,
Scienza e Tecnica, Annuario della EST 88/89 404.
Overview on the frontier of high energy astr... 阅读全帖 |
|
S******8
发帖数: 24594 | 5 老方到美国后发的文章列表，你自己看吧：
1990
174. Biased clustering in a universe with hot dark matter and a cosmic
string, L.Z.Fang, S.P.Xiang and L.Yan, Astr. & Astrophys. 233, 1.
175. Periodicity of redshift distribution in a T-3 universe, L.Z.Fang, Astr.
& Astrophys. 239, 24.
176. An upper limit to quasar's peculiar velocity, L.Z.Fang, Y.Q.Chu, X.F.
Zhu and L.F. Wang, Inter. J. Mod. Phys., 5, 2993.
177. Quasar pair and quasar's peculiar velocity, L.Z.Fang, Developments in
general relativity, astrophysics and qu... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**o
发帖数: 12685 | 6 小飞象你老老实实交代有没有进过stirp club |
|
h*h
发帖数: 27852 | 7 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: hsh (nidaye), 信区: USANews
标 题: wisconsin 遗产法，罗医生的财产处理
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Dec 11 00:36:46 2017, 美东)
Dying without a will in WI
https://www.thebalance.com/dying-without-a-will-in-wisconsin-3505043
Dying Without a Will in Wisconsin
Survived by a spouse and descendants at least one of whom is not the
descendant of the spouse - In this case, the spouse will inherit one-half (1
/2) of the separate property. The descendants of the deceased person will
inherit their deceas... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*h
发帖数: 27852 | 8 Dying without a will in WI
https://www.thebalance.com/dying-without-a-will-in-wisconsin-3505043
Dying Without a Will in Wisconsin
Survived by a spouse and descendants at least one of whom is not the
descendant of the spouse - In this case, the spouse will inherit one-half (1
/2) of the separate property. The descendants of the deceased person will
inherit their deceased parent's share of the community property plus the
balance of the separate property, per stirpes.
婚前财产一半给2老婆，1/6给大女儿，1/3给两个小娃；
婚... 阅读全帖 |
|
k*******n
发帖数: 5546 | 9
bump trigger bar不是问题，只是影响一点trigger pull, 可以自己手动抛光一下；
field stirp之后要组装回去，记得先reset trigger bar一下就不会挂住了。
336 ejector也不算事，几块钱自己换个。
dipped extractor (MIM extractor)罪魁祸首，很讨厌，如果摊上了，只能等Apex的件
。因为Glock不会给你寄non dipped extractor，你把枪寄回去人家也不一定愿意给你
换，运费很贵而且你得自己出，不如买Apex的，Randy Lee靠谱多了，10-8也测试过
写过一篇。
更新: Glock just started sending the new non dipped extractor quietly~~~ |
|
c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 10 Haha, I learned this in Bar/Bri today. |
|
c*******h
发帖数: 72 | 11 终于有个内行出来解释,谢谢！
还有些疑问。每个beneficiary都有指定一个 % of Benefits. 在你的例子中，假设A和
B各继承50%。如果A dies, but B survives. 那么A的50%是给B呢？还是给A的孩子？
我的理解是：如果想把A的50%给B的话，就都不要选。这样by default, A的50%就给了B
。而如果希望A的孩子能够继承，就选择Per capita 或者 Per stripes. 而Per capita
和Per stripes只是决定这A的50%如何在A的Branch(Children)中分配。不知道这个理解
正不正确？
还有，Agent说，这种IRA, 401K, life insurance上的Beneficiary designation
supresedes will. 是不是啊？修改will比一个一个修改这些东西容易多了，似乎这个
规定不太合理。
tree |
|
c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 12 "每个beneficiary都有指定一个 % of Benefits. 在你的例子中，假设A和B各继承50%
。如果A dies, but B survives. 那么A的50%是给B呢？还是给A的孩子？"
If A dies, A's heirs gets the 50%. The heir would be either A's surviving
spouse, or A's children. If A leaves no will and has no surviving spouse or
children, A's property MAY then pass to the sibling B.... it gets a little
complicated.
"如果想把A的50%给B的话，就都不要选。这样by default, A的50%就给了B
。而如果希望A的孩子能够继承，就选择Per capita 或者 Per stripes. 而Per capita
和Per stripes只是决定这A的50%如何在A的Branch(Children)中分配。不知道这个理
解正 |
|
|
