|
|
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 4 If the double over 2C means clubs, what else do you need to consider?
C10 |
|
j*******e
发帖数: 2168 | 5 看看，既不是将牌也不是D，虽然D保留了转攻S的机会。。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 6 攻方块也是必宕。DA之后西家不可能不转攻黑桃。
更要命的是，就算攻梅花也有宕的机会，庄家可能会飞红心。将牌是唯一送成的首攻。 |
|
j*******e
发帖数: 2168 | 7 Never say 必。
你这第三副牌，看上去必攻C的，出什么状况了？ |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 8 除了攻C没看出什么别的选择啊。除非同伴的加倍不是首攻指示性的。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 9 这副牌是BBO上的，只是作个提醒，一般情况下还是应该相信同伴。虽然高水平比赛中
有时候牌手会作出一些特别的选择，但那是有想法的，是整体判断的结果，并不是对同
伴的叫牌视而不见。如果只是去试图模仿人家一些皮毛，难免就东施效颦了。
实际持牌，我（W）手里是 A / 84 / J7632 / K8652
明手（S）：Q82 / A932 / K85 / 974
庄家（N）：K653 / KQ5 / AQ94 / AT
北家开叫1NT之后，南家可以考虑直接2NT邀叫。2C之后，我冒险加了个倍。虽然我的梅
花不是很好，但我更不愿意看到同伴首攻高花。
同伴手持 JT974 / JT76 / T / QJ3，仍然决定首攻小红心，明手H9得墩。之后庄家打
得不是很好，只取得10墩牌。梅花首攻的话必宕。
这副牌看不出不攻梅花的理由：梅花结构QJx在同伴加倍后非常好，从叫牌看明手则多
半四张红心。即便没有对梅花的加倍，CQ也值得考虑。 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 10 Is this a one-time partner? :) |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 11 Random partner, but shows Advanced.
I find most BBO-ers don't pay attention to bidding whatsoever. Also,
signalling is just unheard of. |
|
m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 12 if it is random partner, and you have no agreement on the x nor agreement on
what advanced means, then, you shouldn't double. en. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 13 Of course self-rating at BBO doesn't mean much, but if some pattern is
common on BBO (such as disregard of partner's bid, or more commonly, lack of
it), it does indicate that this is a problem area with average bridge
players.
So the morale is: trust partner, pay attention to the bidding, then use your
judgment to make an opening lead. The most important thing is to observe
and think. If one puts efforts in this area, his/her game can improve.
多谢各位捧场。最后一题选择梅花首攻的都有包子。：-） |
|
m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 14 somehow i feel being used. normally, you would post some challenging
questions that people can actually think about. this time, you just felt
vindicative and wanted us to say that your partner was wrong.
of
your |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 15 Actually, my intention was just to give away some bao-zi. :-)
I don't think it matters who was wrong. It was a random partner, and I was
just getting bored so decided to play a few random hands on BBO...
But I also realize that, random partners are samples. When similar mistake
has been made among different/random BBO players, it tells me that this is a
common mistake. So I brought it up here. Just like I wrote up some
misconception of take-out doubles I saw on BBO. |
|
|
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 18 可惜了这场比赛BBO上解说员太少，对中国队的叫牌也不太熟悉。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 19 中国队采用很怪的体系吗？我想再怪也怪不过饭桶。：-）） |
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 21 前三节咬得很紧，最后一节失误稍多。Good try. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 22 前三节咬得很紧，最后一节失误稍多。Good try. |
|
