f********4
发帖数: 2883 | 1 实际上黑人非常清醒地知道梁警官被起诉是因为他是亚裔。看赫芬顿邮报的第一篇起诉
报道，下面的评论，第一时间的反应就是黑人说这是因为他是亚裔，他会被判罪。大多
数黑人白人都这么认为。在这样的时候，如果我们华人还自欺欺人地假装跟我们无关，
跟对我们的种族歧视无关，还懵懵懂懂地没有反应，美国的公众该会怎么鄙视我们啊？
下面这就是赫芬顿邮报的第一篇报道下面的最早的几段评论：
第一个人说：Indicted, but will never be convicted...Cops who shoots and
kills unarmed black men have never been convicted
马上一个黑人Kareem Rashad回复说：
Yes he will get convicted. He's Asian. Why do you think the indictment came
down in the first place?
下面的大多数人都同意这个黑人的看法：
That would be true if the policeman was white, but he wa... 阅读全帖 |
|
b****4
发帖数: 284 | 2 your visa is not valid, but your status is valid. why it is related? why do
you have to tell them you'll come back to us? rediculus. |
|
L****r
发帖数: 355 | 3 It makes huge difference. Almost in all such small claim courts, two sides
will always tell two different stories when there is no witness (if there is
witness, lz is screwed for sure), so there will always be one side lying.
The owner will insist that his dog didn't do anything wrong. Then it leaves
to the judge to decide whose story is credible based on common sense and his experience. It will be rediculus to
the judge if you insist that a friendly lab dog is trying to attacking you.
Most Amer |
|
D**********s
发帖数: 320 | 4 My point is that the owner of the dog, or the dog itself is at least
partially responsible for the incident.
Because some people are indeed afraid of cerntain animals due to past
ordeals!
is
leaves
his experience. It will be rediculus to
. |
|
w****w
发帖数: 14828 | 5 good point!
is
leaves
his experience. It will be
rediculus to
. |
|
f***r
发帖数: 344 | 6 This is rediculus, i prefer to be rejected |
|
