m*********r
发帖数: 1797 | 1 谢谢，这么看两个基本上一样了？发动机，空间，第三排？那看板上买 Pathfinder的
少，买 qx 60的多啊。
reliability 是不是 qx 60好一些？
很喜欢第三排进出的方式和空间，那如果不需要那些先进功能的话，买 Pathfinder 便
宜好多？ |
|
y*********u
发帖数: 1015 | 2 很简单:不差那$15k的，上GL450。否则QX80。话说要买GL的还是直接上GL550吧。GL450
配置好一些也上8万了。
BTW:我当初也是在GL和QX之间选，最后选了QX。上面很多评论的估计自己从来没开过这
两个车。 |
|
S****o
发帖数: 325 | 3 市面上的550基本都是msrp 9w5左右，450是8w左右，还是有区别的。450的参数就很好
了，550没必要。
[在 yiyuanlouzu (MNCT) 的大作中提到：]
：很简单:不差那$15k的，上GL450。否则QX80。话说要买GL的还是直接上GL550吧。
GL450配置好一些也上8万了。
：BTW:我当初也是在GL和QX之间选，最后选了QX。上面很多评论的估计自己从来没开过
这两个车。
：........... |
|
y*********u
发帖数: 1015 | 4 很简单:不差那$15k的，上GL450。否则QX80。话说要买GL的还是直接上GL550吧。GL450
配置好一些也上8万了。
BTW:我当初也是在GL和QX之间选，最后选了QX。上面很多评论的估计自己从来没开过这
两个车。 |
|
S****o
发帖数: 325 | 5 市面上的550基本都是msrp 9w5左右，450是8w左右，还是有区别的。450的参数就很好
了，550没必要。
[在 yiyuanlouzu (MNCT) 的大作中提到：]
：很简单:不差那$15k的，上GL450。否则QX80。话说要买GL的还是直接上GL550吧。
GL450配置好一些也上8万了。
：BTW:我当初也是在GL和QX之间选，最后选了QX。上面很多评论的估计自己从来没开过
这两个车。
：........... |
|
k*z
发帖数: 4704 | 6 看了所有的评论，大部分意淫，要么想象帝，要么数据婊。
我在开Qx56,test了好几次Gl450,主观上说，两辆车都很好，没什么太大差距，一个开
的舒服点，一个坐的舒服点。
我马上就把开了39个月的QX56还掉了。然后要买一个2013的2W miles以下V8的GL450.
没别的原因就是因为奔驰是我唯一没开过的车了。
QX56车大气，马力足，加速相对慢，但是里面内饰什么的不错，开起来肯定秒杀那些日
系车。
GL450车稍小，马力一般，限速还好，开起来有点软，但是很舒服，内饰算是凑活，
第三排都是只能拿来应急，坐起来肯定不如minivan。两辆车都不是长期可以装俩娃的
车，临时应急可以，长期装俩娃还要minivan.
我基本不拉东西，没法评价这个。
说什么FX，JX比QX好的，可以歇歇了，那些空间都是狭小的不行。说QX质量不好的也可
以歇歇，至少36个月以来，我的车除了保养什么都没修过。
奔驰质量无法评价，从来没开过任何奔驰。
开过3年不到的奥迪Q7, 感觉一般，马力不足，外形很Q.
开过半年的卡宴GTS,马力十足，操控很好，但是空间太小，就是个cross-over.
断断续续开过1年... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******t
发帖数: 1956 | 7 GX是名门闺秀，出得厅堂，下得厨房，质朴而恒远，但确实有些老气。同样作为孩子的
家长，当我带全家人一起外出时，GX会带给我更多的安全感。这是一种用眼睛看不到的
内敛的“豪华”。
QX则华丽多姿，长袖善舞，但底蕴略浅。一会换底盘，一会换名字，一会又把小车上还
有争议的CVT装上大SUV。
至于Captain seat，对于minivan和真正的大SUV，这是优点。我写过一篇文章，列举了
主流大SUV内部尺寸，可惜GX/QX/highlander都是垫底的，第三排完全是抢市场凑数用
的。牺牲第二排一个重要且安全的位子，只为方便进入狭小的补充性的第三排，我不认
为很值。
不过，选车有时就像找恋人一样，情人眼里出西施呀，这个确实没有办法。喜欢就好，
其他无所谓了。
row. |
|
t*******r
发帖数: 2293 | 8 Toyota Highlander 我只从 Limit 开始试的， 都是 6缸 3.5. 而且这款发动机很成熟
。
Lexus RX 不符合我的要求， 没有第三排座， 我根本没看。
Lexus 只在 GX 和 LX 里选择。 LX 真是贵。 Local Toyota dealer 本来有 land
cruiser, 我拖了一个星期去试， 他们竟然已经卖掉了， 没试成。
就事论事， 12 年前我们就选择了 Pathfinder 的豪华版， Infiniti QX4, 真的不太
会去看 Nissan. 现如今， 觉得 QX 60 还行， 但已不是当年了。。。
QX 60 的后备箱是大了， 但每个座位比别的车小些。 这倒也没啥。 Highlander
Limit 我最后能拿到 39000 sale price, 我觉得还行。 但我还是想要 body on frame
, 所以选了 GX。 我觉得 Highlander Limit 39000 还行了。 QX60 内饰比
Highlander 好， 但需要加高档油， 底盘还是要比 highlander 低不少， 所以要是这
两个里选， 我还是会... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****6
发帖数: 7881 | 9 从安全角度考虑，买rdx。从安全笼这一最重要的安全指标考虑。侧撞offset成绩：Rdx
-17, NX -15, QX只有可怜的-10。
这三车里，rdx最安全。qx安全笼设计属于比较差的。 |
|
l*****6
发帖数: 7881 | 10 pilot就是一大号的MDX，综合了qx啥好处？qx最大的特点就是第二排放着car seat也可
以往前挪让第三排乘客进去。Pilot没这功能吧？楼主之所以不想考虑honda了是因为人
家已经有一辆CRV了，想换个牌子体验一下。 |
|
A******o
发帖数: 143 | 11 像上面说的Infinity QX60 可以不用太着急。QX60 卖得没太火。小二都被训练得很会
忽悠。我以前也经过几次Sales Training，都是一个套路。
我上次买车的时候2016 MDX 和 QX 都开了，最后15年底买了16 MDX SHAWD base $
40700 加税，Doc Fee，包括几百块Option。
以前有过Honda Odyssey，Accord 和 Nissan Maximum 都拥有两三年。Nissan质量也
还好，Honda整体质量，可靠性，略好一些，所谓的Reputation 好一点。当然具体到那
两车，也有运气不好的Honda 车。
我的理由买MDX vs QX60 主要是它的SH AWD 好很多，雨雪天气可能安全一些。整体安
全性也好一些。两车最后价钱差不了多少，1-2千元，Option 差距不多。MDX 开起 来
加速快一些，可能整体可靠性好一些， Reputation好一点。内饰略差，差别不大。
Transmission 下坡有顿挫，软件升级之后就好啦。Backup Camera Resolution 略差。
到现在开了一年，15000... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******x
发帖数: 15232 | 12 sea是as和qx的hub
辐射整个美西
sea是as和qx的hub
辐射整个美西
整个州
人口怎么了，fl周gdp美国第四，人口第四，你说为什么没有航空公司开fl去中国的航
线？
另外，wa的人口是6.66 million
不过刚开的时候一周四班，空得可以当卧铺，后来减班才好点。
ua和以前的nw现在的dl都飞sea-nrt，而且都存在非常多年了。以前sea的人回国坐从
nrt转的是最好的选择。一直到现在，微软中国的人来sea基本都是从东京转。说来奇怪
，这条航线只有美国的公司飞，日本的反而没有一家飞。 |
|
e*i
发帖数: 10288 | 13 Forward this post to your email--if you are using telnet
_=_
_=_ Part 001 of 001 of file 5_off_30_cpn.zip
_=_
begin 666 5_off_30_cpn.zip
M4$L#!!0````(`&!D_$)O_NPBKE```.-W```0````-5]O9F9?,S!?8W!N+G!D
M9NV]=5Q5V]8P#"B*I)2((FR1E-@==)=T2(@@M:6[0T5"!`D+#%04D!`%:02D
MI;M#NKN[O@7F$>X]]]SG?=_OGV?NW]YK[KGF&CW''&.N8E82E^2"
MZYI("%$@",C:P(R$GQ\L9VJ%U;
M!:!=#6A'PI!@:9`V"`I'HD`P.%1'4)`$:V6T!P9TL)`0NMAAK^]A0L))""'?
M"Q1`O%=`5C_:H$@,^D`;"H4XT(9!0/]L@\'0R`-M*!Z>/]O@4`C\... 阅读全帖 |
|
f******g
发帖数: 1003 | 14 http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Biology/31787297.html
以前讨论过进中心的条件。
看了几个这两年回去的，
傅肃能
代表性科研论文
1. Fu S, Fan J, Blanco J, Gimenez-Cassina A, Danial NN, Watkins SM,
Hotamisligil GS. Polysome profiling in liver identifies dynamic regulation
of endoplasmic reticulum translatome by obesity and fasting. PLoS Genet.
2012 Aug;8(8):e1002902.
2. Fu S, Watkins SM, Hotamisligil GS. The role of endoplasmic reticulum in
hepatic lipid homeostasis and stress signaling. Cell Metab. 2012 May 2;15(5)
:623-34.
3. Fu S... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
A*********t
发帖数: 7481 | 16 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: qx001 (qx), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: 2012黃金周首日人山人海遊長城現場 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 1 14:27:02 2012, 美东)
发信人: qx001 (qx), 信区: Military
标 题: 2012黃金周首日人山人海遊長城現場
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 1 14:26:22 2012, 美东) |
|
z***y
发帖数: 198 | 17 那个交叉挤
我宁愿飞牌
除非叫牌上或垫牌上表明CK位置不利
因为即使到最后你还是无法判断敌人
是垫成
QX Q
还是
Q QX
ps
这牌例有点象我的签名档了
AC定是受了我签名档的影响:)) |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 18
yeah. we now play 4S to show a independent suit.
hehe, SAKQTxxx HKx DJxx Cx even not enough for namyats I guess?
yes, should show at least Qx. cuebidding pd's suit usually
shows at least Qx. It's said that cuebid oneself's suit shows two honors,
AQ or AK,
I think it's workable. |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 19 Our teammates' problem -- we knew those were problem as the results were all
disastrous.
1. Non vul. with KQ KQJ QJTxxxx x, you are first to speak with 1D. The bidding
went
You LHO CHO RHO
1D 1H x P
2D 3C x P
?
2. vul vs not. hold x Qx KQJxxxx xxx
RHO CHO LHO YOU
2S 3C 4S ?
3. All white. Hold AQxxxxx xx Ax Qx, you are 3rd to speak. Bidding went
CHO RHO YOU LHO
1C 1H 1S 3H(weak)
3S P ?
4. All red. Hold ATxxx KTxx AT Kx, RHO opened a 1st seat 1D, bidding went
RHO YOU LHO CHO
1D 1 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 20 实际赢墩和预计赢墩的差值, 实际防守赢墩和预计防守赢墩的差值是重要的衡量
odr的参数. 也许可以从最简单的问题入手, 比如
AKxxxx 这样的套, 在同伴简单加叫后平均防御赢墩是多少, 平均赢墩数是多少.
如果没有加叫后, 平均赢墩数, 平均防御赢墩.
已知敌人8张配合, 如果左手长, Qx 的预计是多少, 左手短, Qx的预计防御
赢墩是多少, 类似的花色组合非常多, 如果获得这些统计平均值, 也许会对
odr的计算有很大帮助. 说到底, 很多时候叫与不叫还是看这两个差值的
关系我感觉. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 21 如果你持Qx/Qxx，打败定约的希望非常渺茫。你所希望的，是给庄家一个猜测。
站在庄家的立场，如果是Qxxx在梅花套后面，那怎么都做不成，不用多想了。问题时，
当你是Qx/Qxx，或同伴是Qxxx在梅花套前面，这两种情况都可以做成，但庄家不知道是
哪一种情况。如果是前一种，应该用CAK砸，如果后一种，应该从手里向明手飞。所以
我在开始时有个帖子里说，重点在于让庄家构想你的牌。你唯一的希望，就是庄家猜错
。虽然这可能性不大，但总是大过0%。如果用CQ吃了，那就等于彻底投降了。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 22 “如果没有其他信息, 庄家为什么会选择打CQ on side的4-1呢”，理论上来说是不会
。但是桥牌也是一种博弈。你这么想：如果防守方“确知”庄家一定会打３－２，那么
只有Qxxx的时候才会忍让。那么也就是说，在“防家忍让”这个前提下，是不是４－１
分布的概率提高了？这时候并不是完全“没有信息”，防守方的忍让，这本身就是信息
！问一问你自己，会不会Qx/Qxx的时候忍让？这里就有点像是poker，庄家要看，你是
不是在bluff？有时候这取决于临场判断，一念之差的事。跟对手也有关系，除非你是
world class，不然的话，你“犯错”的概率不容小视，也许当庄家考虑到99%的人拿Qx
/Qxx不会忍让，整体条件概率就不同了。总之，你的唯一希望就是制造一点doubt in
declarer's mind，哪怕只是一小丁点，哪怕只有不到百分之一，也胜过百分之零。我
是说IMP或rubber，MP另说。
CQ
的4 |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 23 是不是还有打西家C Kx/Qx 2张机会？如果西家C Kx/Qx 2张，可以
1）HA;
2）DA;
3) HJ;
4) CA，如果西家小，打小投入西家；如果西家垫大，H入明，打C小， |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 24 动方块的时候应该先拔AK，只要3-3，或一家Qx，Tx，都可以拿三墩。而且在击落Qx的
情况下可以不脱手，以后黑桃脱手一墩仍有机会。 |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 25 I agree with DA, HJ.
DA will block that suit. And we need to get 3 tricks from H.
Declear may have:
AKxxxx
Kxx
Qx
xx
or
Axxxxx
Kxx
Qx
Kx |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 26 since east didn't lead C, you should probably play him to hold Qx, Tx or 9x
.
So you ruff D, play S to SA, play low C, with Qx, east may often win CQ
because he doesn't know your plan. So if east plays low, you just play C8.
Later, you can ruff D, cash HJ and play CJ to let it run.
This line works when east holds stiff Q, xx or Qxx and jumps Q as well. |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 27 You are right. You suppose either Qx drop from west or Q in east. This will
give us 9th trick, so the squeeze still works.
If west has only 2S, it is against the chance to play drop. So maybe the
best line is to try to cash DK after one round of trump. If it is not ruffed
, we cash second trump, and ruff a D. This will ensure 4H. If DK is ruffed,
we get back to dummy with second trump, and finesse S. Then squeeze east in
S and C.
This way we won't get -2 if west has Qx in spade.
I just checked b... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 28 You are right. You suppose either Qx drop from west or Q in east. This will
give us 9th trick, so the squeeze still works.
If west has only 2S, it is against the chance to play drop. So maybe the
best line is to try to cash DK after one round of trump. If it is not ruffed
, we cash second trump, and ruff a D. This will ensure 4H. If DK is ruffed,
we get back to dummy with second trump, and finesse S. Then squeeze east in
S and C.
This way we won't get -2 if west has Qx in spade.
I just checked b... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 29 That sounds a reasonable treatment. Maybe I was biased because I saw both
hands during the auction.
Txx
Qx
Qx
AKJxxx
Jxx
AKTx
KJTxx
Q
1C 1D
2C 2H
3C 3S
4D 5C
P (X) P
5D(X)
It seems that the 1C opener did not treat 3S as you suggested. Otherwise he
should be 3NT comfortably with Txx. Although any game is poor for the hand,
3NT seems the best bet. |
|
o***a
发帖数: 1373 | 30 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: qx001 (qx), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: 2012黃金周首日人山人海遊長城現場 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 1 14:27:02 2012, 美东)
发信人: qx001 (qx), 信区: Military
标 题: 2012黃金周首日人山人海遊長城現場
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 1 14:26:22 2012, 美东) |
|
w***w
发帖数: 6301 | 31 Of course it can be a bluff.
Because it doesn't look like a bluff,and it makes no sense to bluff, that is
the reason to bluff.
Albeit the probability of a bluff is small.
He could also have Qx(including AQ).
He could even make a misplay, or simply wrong click.
You just can't fold.
The opponent's style could help a lot in deciding his hand.
chance of Qx,AA,AK: 30%
chance of bluff: 7%
chance of misplay,wrong click and other possibilities: 5%
chance of either A or Q on river: 9%
Chance of a card on |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 32 from his standpoint, nobody bets on the scary flop, he can comfortablly
assume nobody got a Qx (without high diamond hand), otherwise a medium-
strong "protective" bet should occur.
so, if nobody got Qx (with high diamond) or KK/AA (hilgy unlikely due to pre
-flop actions), then his hand (many possibilities) could be well ahead.
actually your JJ hand is at very high/unlikely end of the range he puts you
guys in.
then what makes you guys call his $26 bet on the turn? and two callers? at
least on |
|
n******1
发帖数: 4742 | 33 我打的6max
第一手我主要是想和short stacker preflop all in来着。。没想到后面那个cold
4bet了。。 后来short fold了。。 我call 了 button是AJo riverJ
55那个，K出来以后我觉得我的bet是value bet .. 不过赶上那个人是K3... short
stacker button也steal啊。。我可能应该preflop allin...
Kj那个我打的太烂了，我选择了pot control 因为我觉得我只能赢QX和KT ..
然后river 8 sb bet 按照我的思路我应该fold ，因为这时候QX和KT 都应该ck to
showdown。。 我没坚持住call了.. 输给了86... 我应该坚定打法。。如果会call
river 其实应该在turn 2nd barrel... 这把最烂了。。
我发现我对short stacker好像 push的太狠了，如果我是AJ+，A5s+ KQs，55+我都想和他们
preflop all in ...
fact utg looks real strong to |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 34 whale is a very nice chinese but bad player. this is the 2nd time i sit at
the same table with him. he could easily dump $2K/night at 1/2NL, you can
imagine how he plays.
PLO is LAG, but selective too. i sit on his left all night and exchange a
lot of chips back and forth. in the end, we simply don't trouble each other
any more. he builds his $200 buy-in to $1.3K at one time. then all of a
sudden, make a string of stupid mistakes and got busted. i don't know about
his PLO background until someon... 阅读全帖 |
|
W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 35 This depends on the player. Vs a loose passive player (most of 1/2 live
player) who rarely raise river for value or for bluff, we definitely bet big
to get full vale from Qx and smaller flush. I would bet 70$-80$ range
when PLO checks and fold to a raise. This hand is just played very
strangely. The read on whale was wrong, the play was wrong too. So it end up
a winning hand. Now 3 bet shove river has even less logic in it except for
an after thought that the whale actually had Qx I should ha... 阅读全帖 |
|
r****r
发帖数: 1394 | 36 for hand 2, i think, chk to induce is common play. however,
if both guys are good, i like to bet pot on turn and river, to polarize,
hoping that he makes two hero calls with sth like TT/JJ.
if he has such things---bluff catchers, he won't bluff too much.
i think the logic is like this: your chk-raise flop includes:
air, flush draw, Qx and set/2pair
your big turn bet includes:
air and flush, but probably not Qx/set/2pair. this increases the chance he
makes hero call.
SB
action
make
him |
|
W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 37 good analysis~
I think a regular aggressive player will bet his entire range on the turn
here, 9X/Qx+ for value and protection of the hand, a pair + straight draw
for value and seminbluff, total airball. we definitely can not fold.
actually we can even consider a small raise here to freeze action and get
value from weaker hand. Normally, if we have a decent image, a normal live
villian (relatively loose, not extremely aggressive) would not reraise back
with any draws but would continue with a... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****0
发帖数: 611 | 38 Yes, before I called him, I said its's really a good bet. And UTG nod his
head. I figured he had Qx. But not sure what's the other one. With $6 mini
raised pre-flop, could be AQ, KQ, QJ, QT, or Qx. Only KQ, QJ beat me. So I
still called. River 9. Check to UTG, he pushed me all in. And I called
with about $80. Unfourtunately,he showed KQ. His snap call on the flop
confused me.
Will this be a easy fold to you guys on the turn?
And for the first hand:
I was pretty sure he had small pair. ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
g****1
发帖数: 1398 | 40 【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: qx001 (qx), 信区: Stock
标 题: 靠，被美女每抽1巴掌得付100元，日男真TMD贱！ (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 1 15:13:10 2012, 美东)
发信人: qx001 (qx), 信区: Military
标 题: 靠，被美女每抽1巴掌得付100元，日男真TMD贱！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 1 15:12:19 2012, 美东) |
|
o**4
发帖数: 35028 | 41 还有这个人，文章也一般
1. Driscoll CA, Luo SJ, MacDonald D, Dinerstein E, Chestin I, Pereladova O
and O'Brien SJ (2011). Restoring tigers to the Caspian region. Science 333:
822-823. [Letter to Editor]
2. Luo SJ, Johnson WE, and O’Brien SJ (2010). Applying molecular genetic
tools to tiger conservation. Integrative Zoology 5: 351-362. [Invited Review]
3. Luo SJ, Johnson WE, Martenson J, Antunes A, Martelli P, Uphyrkina O,
Traylor-Holzer K, Smith JLD and O’Brien SJ (2008). Subspecies genetic
assignments of w... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*******n
发帖数: 10103 | 42 无限只有3款是45k以上的，M、FX、QX
QX极少见到。 |
|
c*********r
发帖数: 19468 | 43 Infiniti的头出来解释了：
A Message from Johan de Nysschen to Infiniti Owners and Fans
Dear Infiniti fans: We love you dearly. And we know you love the brand.
Which means it's only natural that you may feel surprised by the
announcement that we plan to change our nomenclature philosophy. No one
likes change.
It was a tough decision. We like our current model names as much as you do.
But we had no choice but to change. Let me explain.
1. We are embarking on a massive product offensive, and these new cars ... 阅读全帖 |
|
C**T
发帖数: 5379 | 44 mdx和Infiniti那个什么qx多少来着
定位都是伪三排亚豪华xover
如果不考虑价位，可以添上q7
其他的x5和gle，卡宴等，不是一个级别
gl，escalade，qx数字最大的那号，这些xc90抬着头也看不到人肩膀，没可比性 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 45 我觉得改名字没问题
但现在这种改法,实在是不咋样
像infiniti,以前本来就有Q系列和QX系列
现在突然用Q/QX+数字来命名,考虑到通常字母加数字都是指同款不同的排量(型号)
会让人有明显误解 |
|
w***w
发帖数: 6301 | 46 来自主题: _TexasHoldem版 - 这手牌 Of course it can be a bluff.
Because it doesn't look like a bluff,and it makes no sense to bluff, that is
the reason to bluff.
Albeit the probability of a bluff is small.
He could also have Qx(including AQ).
He could even make a misplay, or simply wrong click.
You just can't fold.
The opponent's style could help a lot in deciding his hand.
chance of Qx,AA,AK: 30%
chance of bluff: 7%
chance of misplay,wrong click and other possibilities: 5%
chance of either A or Q on river: 9%
Chance of a card on |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 47 from his standpoint, nobody bets on the scary flop, he can comfortablly
assume nobody got a Qx (without high diamond hand), otherwise a medium-
strong "protective" bet should occur.
so, if nobody got Qx (with high diamond) or KK/AA (hilgy unlikely due to pre
-flop actions), then his hand (many possibilities) could be well ahead.
actually your JJ hand is at very high/unlikely end of the range he puts you
guys in.
then what makes you guys call his $26 bet on the turn? and two callers? at
least on |
|
a***n
发帖数: 5665 | 48 i am debating 335 or 535.
BMW的0.9% APR还算多的，美式大车（美式说的是风格，包括美产、日产、德产等等各
种油老虎）一般都0% APR加cash back，这还是官方offer，从dealer手中拿到的折扣就
更多了。当然，Porsche的Cay
FX、QX。当然还有X5 3.0和4.8。至于油老虎Lincoln Navigator、Cadillac Escalade
、Hummer H2和越野专车Range Rover Sports、Jeep Grand Cherokee、Mercedes G，看
看就好了，实在用不起，也修
它类似第八代accord那种风格的布满按钮的中控台。FX太威猛了点，而且内饰比较简陋
，照片上感觉仪表盘的颜色风格很漂亮，实际坐进去发现不是那么回事。QX太笨拙了，
应该是某个美式大卡车直
个档次的。ML和GL基本是一种车，但GL更长，加了第三排座。具体驾驶我说不上什么来
，因为我也很少推到D档激烈驾驶，我能感觉到的无非是换挡平顺，350、450的动力就
比较充足，刹车好。EX有些小，GX一坐进去就有“做工
是因为我习惯了BM |
|
d**x
发帖数: 1934 | 49 我觉得你可以trade-in 335i vert换个sedan好了
我觉得不用补钱诶。。
BMW的0.9% APR还算多的，美式大车（美式说的是风格，包括美产、日产、德产等等各
种油老虎）一般都0% APR加cash back，这还是官方offer，从dealer手中拿到的折扣就
更多了。当然，Porsche的Cay
FX、QX。当然还有X5 3.0和4.8。至于油老虎Lincoln Navigator、Cadillac Escalade
、Hummer H2和越野专车Range Rover Sports、Jeep Grand Cherokee、Mercedes G，看
看就好了，实在用不起，也修
它类似第八代accord那种风格的布满按钮的中控台。FX太威猛了点，而且内饰比较简陋
，照片上感觉仪表盘的颜色风格很漂亮，实际坐进去发现不是那么回事。QX太笨拙了，
应该是某个美式大卡车直
个档次的。ML和GL基本是一种车，但GL更长，加了第三排座。具体驾驶我说不上什么来
，因为我也很少推到D档激烈驾驶，我能感觉到的无非是换挡平顺，350、450的动力就
比较充足，刹车好。EX有些小，GX |
|
