l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 气候门丑闻中的一个电邮是这样来压制对暖化有不同意见的论文的：这篇论文假如发表
会造成危害！把它枪毙掉很不容易，因为它在数学上看起来是正确的！我们怎样才能枪
毙它呢？
http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/16/climategatekeeping/#more-9569
Climategatekeeping
In the MIT Climategate Forum, Ronald Prinn trotted out what has become one
of the standard “move along” memes in the climate science community: that
while the “tone” of the Climategate emails was “unprofessional”, they
did not succeed in their “endeavour” to prevent publication of articles in
journals or mentions in IPCC. Prinn at |
|
