m**t
发帖数: 1292 | 1 note this RFC is not strictly speaking a NAT66, indeed the author has
changed its naming to NPTv6 if you've noticed and it is also experimental.
None of other nat66 or napt66 drafts has survived
I think the only potential legitimate reason is as what this NPTv6 claims to
solve, but don't think there is any mandatory cases..meaning you can always
configure/modify/plan/enforce your network addressing scheme without using
the NPTv6 solution although it provides convenience.
What is a compelling r... 阅读全帖 |
|
