|
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 3 SA looks like a good lead here. you need to take a look at dummy. If dummy
holds long D or C, you'd better see partner's signal to determine whether
you like to continue S or switch to H. If dummy doesn't hold a long suit,
you can also have a better guess on which suit to play next based on your
partner's signal and dummy's hand.
low H can be very bad when declarer holds H stopper and they have a cashing
long minor. Sometimes, your partner may hold SKQxxx to beat it one trick. SA
may cost you a... 阅读全帖 |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 4 SA may lost a tempo.
dummy
cashing
SA
SA |
|
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 6 S AKTxxxx
H KJx
D 9
C 98
1S 2H
?
(1) what's your bid?
(2) suppose you bid 3H, partner 4C, now what? |
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 8 You need to give context, such as:
1) Do you play 2-over-1?
2) Does 2S rebid promise 6+?
3) Do you play serious 3NT? |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 9 yes, no, yes (non-serious, as i remember) |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 10 If 3NT is "non-serious", then 4C is "serious cuebid". I think I'd bid 4NT
now. |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 11 This is a hand to bid 2S to show 6+ spade (or 2NT if your system use 2NT to
show 6+ spades). If you don't have way to show 6+ S, your system sucks and
you'd better bid 3H here. Over 4C, it's clear to bid 4D. |
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 13 What was partner's hand and how did the bidding go? |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 14 S x
H Q9xx
D KTxxx
C Txx
white vs red
1D (2C) ? |
|
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 17 Was 3D bid at the table? |
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 18 S AKxxx
H JTx
D Axx
C Ax
both red
1S P P 2H
? |
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 20 There is choice between opening 1S and 1NT. But once opened 1S, passing now
is pretty clear. What else can you do? |
|
|
|
a****s
发帖数: 524 | 23 S AK
H 852
D JT73
C AK98
1H 2C
2H ?
your agreement is 3N here 15-17, 2N show 12-14 or 18+
4H no extra, and 3H no less than 4H.
what is your choice? |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 24 (assuming 2/1) if 2h is the default rebid for a balanced minimum, then 4h;
if 2h shows 6+, then 3h... (side question: no j2nt for GF with 4+ support?) |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 25 Well, many play that 2H is the default rebid, but it doesn't necessarily
show minimum... it is just ambiguous...i mean...default... It certainly
doesn't deny longer hearts or extra value, just a hand that doesn't fit in
other descriptive bids.
I would probably bid 3H with this hand. 3NT is right on value, but it doesn'
t show heart support. I have only 3 small hearts, but I do have a doubleton.
With 4333, I'd bid 3NT. |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 26 I will bid 3H too. This is a 6-loser hand and partner opens. Unless partner
is the extreme minimum we have decent chance in H slam. If partner can cue
4D, we push to slam. If he returns to 4H, we'll pass.
doesn'
doubleton. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 27 7-loser hand and too balanced, and bad hearts :-)
After 3H, the way I play is: 3S shows non-serious interest (i.e. "I am
willing to cooperate just in case you have serious slam interest, but I don'
t have enough to initiate it"), 3NT shows "serious interest" with spade
cuebid, 4C/4D are "serious cuebid". So if partner bids "non-serious 3S", I
would just sign off in 4H. If partner bids a "serious 4D", then I will RKC. |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 28 I always count it wrong :)
don' |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 29 What's your sequence if spade is agreed as trump?
3NT = serious?
4C/4D/4H = non-serious cuebid?
don' |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 30 If spade is trump, then 3NT=non-serious, 4C/4D/4H = serious cuebid |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 31 2NT and pass partner's 3NT (which should show a balanced hand and suitable
for NT). If partner bid 3D over 2NT to show D value, you can bid 3H here. If
partner bids 3C, you can bid 3H. If partner bids 3H, you bid 3S as a cuebid
. If partner bids 3S to show 5-6 in majors and weak hand, you can cuebid 4C
to show some forward going interest, because your partner may still hold
QJxxx AQJxxx - xx to offer an excellent play in 6H.
Jumping to 3NT directly is simply bad bridge. |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 32 Does 3S show 5-6 in major? I think H-S-S will show 5-6, H-H-S will show 6-4.
Surely, showing 4 spades here won't help to find a fit, but it may be
useful for pd to evaluate his hand. Is this traditional method obsolete?
If
cuebid
4C |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 33 with 5-6 very weak hand, you can't bid 2S. So you have to bid 2H first and
later show S to show this type. With 4-6, you can just bid 3H over 2NT. So
3S here shows exactly 5-6 and weak hands.
4. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 34 There are different schools of 2/1. Some play that 1H-2m-2S doesn't show
extra value, then H-S-S would show 5-6, strength undefined. Others play that
1H-2m-2S shows extra (although it doesn't have to be as strong as true
reverse), so H-S-S would show 5-6 and strong hand, while H-H-S shows 4-6 or
5-6 weakish hand. Another factor is whether 1H-2m-2H promises 6+ cards. If
2H rebid doesn't promise 6+, then with many 4-6 shape you would just rebid
3H again, unless your 4-card spades are strong. |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 35 The future of this hand is very unclear, it seems 3H might be good in many
possible situations. |
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 37 For beginners, it is much more damaging to play with random players (
especially those who self-claims adv/exp and teach others wrong stuff). What
I would recommend is to play a robot game instead. These games are free at
BBO. Although these robots make awful bidding and defense errors at times,
you get to see a lot of hand patterns, and you get to play lots of hands (
and the pace is much quicker too). In fact, I know a national champion who
does just that a few days before major NABC games, he... 阅读全帖 |
|
n****i
发帖数: 109 | 38 刚从NABC回来,请教大家这种牌在第一或第二家开叫吗?假设局况对等.
牌例1:
S: AQxxx
H: x
D: Ax
C: 10xxxx
牌例2:
S: AQxxx
H: xxx
D: KJxxx
C: --
谢谢. |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 39 我今天看到的，以前有吗？40刀打三天，看着还不错，有人试过吗？ |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 40 Then it is meaningless... |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 41 我今天看到的，以前有吗？40刀打三天，看着还不错，有人试过吗？ |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 42 Then it is meaningless... |
|
p***r
发帖数: 4606 | 43 （1）鳄鱼是第一支以同样首发阵容卫冕成功的球队。
UF是第一个学校连续那些BB-FB-BB的学校。
SG Lee Humphrey是NCAA Tournament的3分记录保持者(47个)。
C Al Horford是UF NCAA Tournament单场篮板记录保持者(17个)。
Lee Humprhey当选为first team academic all America，GPA为3.68.
鳄鱼全年命中率是52.7%,今年NCAA之最。
鳄鱼今年赛季初排名第一，为学校历史首次。
Al Horford, Joakim Noah and Corey Brewer入选First-Team All-SEC。
Lee Humphrey was the SEC Scholar-Athlete of the Year
(2) Al Horford和Joakim Noah入选Second-Team NABC All-America; Taurean Green
入选Second-Team All-SEC。
|
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 44 人年纪大了记忆就会下降。以前参加NABC，每天６４副之后和搭档谈牌基本都不用牌型
表，小牌也大多记得。现在大概不记得几副了。 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 45 美国赛场是禁烟的，以前在国内打牌，最不喜欢的也是吸二手烟。桥牌复盘有点象围棋
，经过周密的富于逻辑的思考，这些牌还是相对容易能够记住的。高手对体力的消耗要
小很多，主要原因在于经验，有足够的经验应对多数常见局势，另外防守信号打的比较
明确的牌手有很多天然优势，因为很多不可能的局面已经被信号排除了，所以相对要节
省很多体力。当然对付Hamman这样的对手，很多信号也要谨慎的打，甚至故意误导。
NABC通常是两周时间，我见过一些职业牌手，每天打上百副牌，依然能够保持相当好的
水平。 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 46 我去那儿打过一次NABC。第一个项目第二天被淘汰。第三天我就去art institute散心
去了。回来之后搞得很成功，搞了个第１３名。就是最后关头和搭档闹翻了。
路。 |
|
|
