h*******e
发帖数: 1377 | 1 。。。建模然后预测，有非linear 的 choatic 模型，还有linear 模型之类的。
话说文艺复兴基金hire一帮lingustic 还有物理学家数学家什么的 就是因为lingustic
经常通过前言预测后语。 |
|
m******a
发帖数: 1394 | 2 sigh, don't know what to say. You don't have a green card, it's gonna be
very tough to find a job.
You degree in lingustics actually might help you get a job, which sponsor
work visa. I know several people with lingustics major got job here. |
|
s**********1
发帖数: 305 | 3 The overall existing evidence is strong enough to allow us to conclude that
we are all initially from Africa. I don't understand the fossil evidence
myself, but the molecular evidence is mounting and hard to reject. It is
also true that details and discrepancies need to be addressed in the future.
However, that is within the frame of African origin of the modern human
race. I can't imagine if Chinese evolved independently from humans
elsewhere in the world, how Chinese and other humans fina... 阅读全帖 |
|
l********o
发帖数: 5629 | 4 1.traditional c/c++ software engineer, mainly based on windows. Most of them
know little about probability and statistics, nor are they interested in
the world outside coding. They are often called geek and are disliked by
normal people.
2. Big data software engineer. They know everything ranging from coding,
probability, statistics, algorithm to business, law, politics,literature,
lingustics, human nature, etc. Their love the world. Their ambition is to
computationalize everything. They prefer ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
B*****e
发帖数: 9375 | 6 Which is more the reason not to equally emphasize each phoneme in a foreign
name.
And again, how did "Jordan" become "乔丹"? By its look or by its sound, it
does not translate to "乔", and that's a strightforward one-phoneme-to-one-
character conversion, with an (almost) perfect match of "左".
This one thread covers such topics as a baseball player's suspension, name
choices, movie genres, and lingustic discrepancies. What an erudite group.
dialects |
|
c******n
发帖数: 5697 | 7 yeah but it's cuz MIT got Noam Chomsky,
thats why they can boast their lingustics rankings |
|
d********0
发帖数: 5142 | 8 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Zephyre (宁静致远) 于 (Mon Mar 28 19:49:52 2011, 美东) 提到:
我觉得任何程度贬低Yale的估计都是学工程和自然科学的发展中国家的博士生，还带着
五六十年代“学好数理化、走遍天下都不怕”的农民工思想，其最高理想就是在微软、
苹果、思科一类公司做个高级打工的，拿15-20万年薪，各方面都土得要死还人前人后
觉得自己很精英的土鳖。
MIT连美国大学里最重要的法学院都没有，其整体影响力怎么跟耶鲁比？
拿任何学校都有的文理学院来比吧，MIT才22个专业，关键学科缺失的实在太多，例如艺术史、心理学，社会学、地质学、考古学、护理学、天文学、电影等等等等。
拿外语/文化系看，MIT仅有法语、德语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、汉语、日语和ESL,耶鲁
要全很多，除上述还有斯拉夫语言、意大利语、近东语言文化、东亚语言文化、古典研
究等等等等。MIT连心理学都没有！连英国语言文化系都没有！连基本的天文、地质都
没有！跟耶鲁这种综合大牛比个屁啊？
再说录取率，耶鲁的录取率一向跟哈佛、斯坦... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*******n
发帖数: 2078 | 9 我的意思是，社会学是social science 的学科，更humanity的学科是完全两回事。文
学和哲学以及lingustic 都是humanity的学科。
我承认社会学的英文是打错了。
年天才，没人捧你臭脚。会丢人的。 |
|
k**********4
发帖数: 16092 | 10 just to be clear, current lingustics do think all the languages
orgininated from a single common language. |
|
l********o
发帖数: 5629 | 11 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: liyuanchao (李源潮), 信区: Military
标 题: 两种码工
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Dec 18 16:58:29 2014, 美东)
1.traditional c/c++ software engineer, mainly based on windows. Most of them
know little about probability and statistics, nor are they interested in
the world outside coding. They are often called geek and are disliked by
normal people.
2. Big data software engineer. They know everything ranging from coding,
probability, statistics, algorithm to business, law, politics,literatur... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*s
发帖数: 1504 | 12 does not make sense
the best conference in my field is listed as unranked
and a worse conference is listed as rank 1
Linguistics)
GP)
Recognition
Lingustics
Intelligent Agent Technology
Computation
Modelling, Control and Automation
Technologies and Internet Commerce
Systems
Linguistics
Machines
Synthesis
Synthesis for Embedded Systems
Based Parallel Computing
Methods
Communications & Computers
Computer Science Conference
Applications
and Techniques
Telecommunication Services
Information Systems |
|
d*****u
发帖数: 17243 | 13 计算语言学其实包括computational lingustics和natural language processing两大块
现在一般都不区分，或者界限模糊，所以要仔细看program的要求
严格说CL是用计算的方法研究语言学问题，具体又分成两类
一是研究human language processing的
现在很多人做（human) sentence parsing，用一些统计方法和其他法则模拟句子解析
但是也有做acquisition的
还有mental lexicon等等
感觉这一部分对语言学基础要求较高，同时要懂人工智能
我觉得这是很有前途的方向，但是做的人很少，
主要是因为很少有人既懂语言学又懂人工智能和机器学习
也没那么多老师
二是做语料库的
实际就是做数据库的一种，但是要对语言学稍有了解
这个现在其实需求还是挺多，因为语料库有各种要求，针对各种研究
但是技术含量就一般了，相对比较枯燥
而NLP是研究自然语言的机器处理，不一定直接借用语言学理论
比如tagging, parsing, machine translation, dialogue system等等都可以算 |
|
w********n
发帖数: 22 | 14 我是申请法拉盛的lingustics, 他们主动给我打电话联系我的，护理要本科吧不多吧，
本科谁去啊，都去抽H1了吧。我这几天去了好多次，好像不少博士也来还有J1的，我跟
他们解释了我的出现的问题，他们态度很好，陪他们与上面进行了解释，他们说我是第
一个例子，必须解决这个问题，还是要等他们电话看结果，teacher，你是不是我做测
验那天看见的美女啊呵呵，谢谢你鼓励我模拟测试成绩不错，不过口语不好，哎，就是
试试，也祝大家顺利 |
|
