|
|
|
|
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 6
That skin thing is probably based on WPF. It finally pays off after being
out since .Net 3 |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 7 "meaning full browser support with flash courtesy of Windows 7 on an Atom
N270 at 1.6GHz, with 2GB of DDR2 memory and a 32GB SSD with SD expansion."
"Battery life is only four hours, but at least it's user-replaceable, and a
price of $599 matches the 32GB iPad" |
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 8
Lots of companies are still on the fence waiting for the latest INTEL
atom chips and WinCE7's shipping b4 deciding what kinda tablets they want
to build. 2nd half will be interesting. |
|
x****n
发帖数: 74 | 9 I must say few people has realized the power of WPF and silverlight :) I
think their designs are pretty neat.
being |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 10 neat 不 neat 不管用
消费电子得看买家喜欢不喜欢 |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 11 你是说写application的公司和程序员喜欢不喜欢吧。
比如说现在flash dominates，silverlight是否能够吸引现有flash 用户转向silver
light，（功能和易用性） |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 12 flash 怎么 dominates 了
手机上不看 flash 的人还是大多数
silverlight 首先就是耗资源，速度不一定够快
其次用户界面做成啥样，跟 API 关系不大 |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 13 没明白你的逻辑.
我没说谁好谁不好.
用户界面想做成啥样都可以, 除非很特殊, 否则flash和silver light都能做到.
所以我说是写application的公司和程序员决定用哪种技术, 和你说的用户喜欢不喜欢
没啥关系. 用户喜欢的东西, 两种技术都能做出来.
另外如果原文说silver light比flash powerful和neat, 能做出来的东西就比flash多,
花的时间少. |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 14 程序员写的东西用户不喜欢的话公司怎么赚钱？
咋没关系呢。。。
Phon7 弄成这种 Powerpoint slides 似的样子
偶看个人用户不一定很感冒
多, |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 15 再看一遍, 你好像在同意我的观点啊. 公司和程序员决定哪个技术, 和用户界面做成咋
样无关.这和你原文不一样.
另外, flash就是dominate, flash出名浪费资源. 手机资源有限, 对flash支持有限,
所以手机用户选择少, 否则flash的内容还是最多.你要是把因果倒过来,我也没办法. |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 16 flash 内容怎么最多了？比文字的内容还多？比新闻图片还多？ |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 17 原文在夸silver light好, 你好像不屑一顾的样子.
从来没有人反对要做用户喜欢的东西啊. |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 18 silver light 用 C++ 重写一遍还差不多
一向对 C# 不感冒 |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 19 你是不懂还是抬杠啊. 要比flash和silverlight 当然是比他们应用的东西上,如
multimedia, 包括animation和无限制排版等.
flash dominates的意思就是这类东西还是用flash写的多, 手机上不能放就是因为
flash耗资源. |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 20 很多人不需要 flash，也不怎么需要 silver light
比这俩有啥意义呢 |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 21 core还是c++啊.
c#是让程序员写application方便,大妈都能写.
给你native api, 只让你编程更麻烦, 没别的好处. |
|
s**********g
发帖数: 314 | 22 ......
很多人不需要ipad, 也不需要win pad. 咱们在这里讨论有啥意义呢.
洗洗睡吧. |
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 23
SilverLight pwns anything you throw in front of it and does not 耗资源
more than Java does. |
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 24
You still have a lot to learn b4 being able to make sensible comment on
SilverLight and C# in general. |
|
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 25 why most of windows is still in C++
not C# if C# is so great? |
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 26
That's b/c C++ is still #1 when it comes to coding system level software.
If you look at the application level, WPF/SILVERLIGHT/WF/WCF and so on
are already well adopted (e.g. in Office 2010 / SharePoint).
If Android can be done in Java then WM7 can be done in C# / SilverLight.
As simple as that. |
|
|
|
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 30 This thing rapes iPad inside out. |
|
|
