D*******e
发帖数: 12862 | 1 <2>
上一章写了横跨整个90年代和新世纪初的Braves王朝以后，版霸给我补充了一个当年的
很有趣的小花絮--1995年勇士终于拿下萎琐大赛之后，"德高望重"的珍芳达的老公按捺
不住激动，在冠军戒指上自封"Team of the Decade!!" 班霸给出的画外音是“这个年
代才过了一半，猴急个啥呀!! 结果，在Decade剩下的一半里 ，洋基赢了四次，
其中两次是击败勇士赢得，显然更符合Team of the Decade的头衔。” 嗯，班霸当年
的确很有先见之明，成功预言了洋基的强势崛起。。。那么在这里咱们姑且就做个中和
，把Braves称做是Team of the 1st half of that decade。：) 拿下95年的ws后，可
想而知Braves organization当时肯定是十分的乐观，因为Braves其实90年代初就已经
崛起了，可惜运气太差91，92连续输了两次ws，93年的无敌阵容又被Schilling的
Phillies给upset了，然后赶... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****h
发帖数: 44903 | 2 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Dominique (曾经木木难为水 除却金色不是云) 于 (Sat Dec 30 14:37:39 2017, 美东) 提到:
<2>
上一章写了横跨整个90年代和新世纪初的Braves王朝以后，版霸给我补充了一个当年的
很有趣的小花絮--1995年勇士终于拿下萎琐大赛之后，"德高望重"的珍芳达的老公按捺
不住激动，在冠军戒指上自封"Team of the Decade!!" 班霸给出的画外音是“这个年
代才过了一半，猴急个啥呀!! 结果，在Decade剩下的一半里 ，洋基赢了四次，
其中两次是击败勇士赢得，显然更符合Team of the Decade的头衔。” 嗯，班霸当年
的确很有先见之明，成功预言了洋基的强势崛起。。。那么在这里咱们姑且就做个中和
，把Braves称做是Team of the 1st half of that decade。：) 拿下95年的ws后，可
想而知Bra... 阅读全帖 |
|
Q******g
发帖数: 607 | 3 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> Yankees (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:2)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:1)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillies -----> DBacks (4:3)
WS
Yankees -- DBacks ----> DBacks |
|
M******k
发帖数: 27573 | 4 全是瞎猜得~~~~~~
AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:1)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS
RedSox - Yankees ----> RedSox (4:3)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:2)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Rockies (3:2)
NLCS
DBacks - Rockies ---------> DBacks (4:2)
WS
RedSox - DBacks --------> RedSox (4:1) |
|
y**o
发帖数: 925 | 5 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:1)
RedSox - Angels -----> Angels (3:1)
ALCS:
Angels - Yankees ----> Yankees (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:1)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:2)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillies -----> DBacks (4:1)
WS
DBacks -- Yankees ----> Yankees |
|
m*********7
发帖数: 15 | 6 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:2)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ---->Yankees (4:1)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:0)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Rockies (3:1)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillies -----> DBacks (4:0)
WS
Yankees -- DBacks ---->Yankees (4:2) |
|
d*****s
发帖数: 313 | 7 frankly, I think it is too much talent to trade Soriano and Weaver for
Schilling and DBacks will not accept this offer. The reason DBacks want
to get rid of CS is for salary reason. Weaver makes about 8M next year.
If DBacks get him in return they do not save much.
Don't just look at Soriano as a K machine. He is just too much talent
to be commented that way. Give him a couple of years, he will be one
of the best players in baseball. He has already shown what kind of player
he can be.
Also, I sa |
|
D*******e
发帖数: 12862 | 8 预测正确任何一个playoffs系列的都分别有奖！
我先写写我的预测（希望大家都给一个complete的表格）：
AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:1)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:2)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> RedSox (4:3)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:1)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:1)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillie |
|
O**l
发帖数: 255 | 9 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> Yankees (4:3)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:2)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:1)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillies -----> Phillies (4:3)
WS
RedSox -- Phillies ----> RedSox (4:2)
|
|
l******n
发帖数: 215 | 10 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (4:1)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (4:2)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> RedSox (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:0)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (4:1)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillies -----> Phillies (4:1)
WS
RedSox -- Phillies ----> RedSox (4:2) |
|
G******f
发帖数: 16223 | 11 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> RedSox (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:0)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:1)
NLCS:
DBacks ---- Phillies -----> Phillies (4:3)
WS
RedSox -- Phillies ----> RedSox (4:0) |
|
B*****R
发帖数: 1539 | 12 相对A'S，GIANTS的前景还要光明得多，只有继续咬住NL WEST，最后
还是很有机会打进PLAYOFF
的。GIANTS的命运更多要看DODGERS的发挥，如果DODGER继续发挥良
好，GIANTS就凶多吉少，
相对DBACKS的前景倒没有那么重要。
1)GIANTS的ROTATION基本发挥良好，出了HERNANDEZ，这黑小子今年
够烂
2)打击力量比去年有得有失，BONDS，AURILLA，MURRAY，SENTIAGO等
都有比预期好的发挥，
但SNOW很差，加上还没有人能够填补BURKS留下的空缺。
3)BAKER还是老谋深算，他的临场指挥还是令人称道，虽然丢了几场C
LOSE GAME和拉力赛，
但并没有太多的失误，比ART HOWE要强
4)FELIX ROD这黑小子很牛，而且越来越牛，替ROB NEN分担了不少，
相对来看NEN的发挥倒
起伏很大。
5)GIANTS还是GIANTS，没有那么EXCITING，但总是中规中拒，不象A
‘S那么容易犯不该犯的
错误。
6)可惜的是BONDS的HOMER并没有帮GIANTS赢更多的球
咬住DBACK，BEAT DODG |
|
y***r
发帖数: 65 | 13 may be very wrong ..
NLE: Mets
NLC: Cards
NLW: DBacks
WC: Braves
Mets over DBacks
Cards over Braves
Cards over Mets
ALE: Yanks
ALC: Sox
ALW: Ms
WC: Rangers
Yanks over Rangers
Ms over Sox
Ms over Yanks
WS: Cards over Ms |
|
a***n
发帖数: 5665 | 14 AL
Indians - Yankees ---> Indians (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> Angels (3:2)
ALCS:
Indians - Angels ----> Angels (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> DBacks (3:1) |
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 15 If you watch many games, you'll notice Lincecum has been very lucky
the whole year: Giants could score some runs when he started, and
made a lot of spectacular defensive plays. More importantly, the whole
NLW stinks for most time, and there are only 2 hot teams offensively:
DBacks in Apr., and Dodgers after getting Manny. Guess what? Lincecum
didn't face either of them ONCE. He was kicking the dead horses Padres
and Dodgers in Apr. again and again, and faced Dbacks twice in Sep.
Also, he was hit |
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 16 Very very dominant in DBacks, quite close to Unit. That also could be
the only WS title DBacks will have 100 years from now.
see
I |
|
z****l
发帖数: 5282 | 17 按版规，发新帖refer 14天
不当回贴refer的已封7天，顶风作案的14天。
129378 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 z2000 在 Money 版
129379 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 yixia1972 在 Money 版
129380 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 ccqtjjtds 在 Money 版
129381 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 zymu 在 Money 版
129382 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 datauser 在 Money 版
129383 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 cacacaca 在 Money 版
129384 * deliver Sep 29 ● zengdl 封 dback 在 Money 版
129385 * deliver Sep 29 ... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*****x
发帖数: 304 | 18 20号买的，到现在也没收到卖家的任何确认，发email也不理我。98.3%的positive fee
dback，6000多次交易。原来以为还算可靠的。用Paypal-CC付得钱。如之奈何？ |
|
b****e
发帖数: 985 | 19 这有什么残酷的，有赢必有输嘛，
As的工资排名倒数第六，
前初所有的预测都是giants在Dbacks
和dodgers后面排第三，
giants主场六连败开局，
As八月份落后mariners 7场，
这样都双双打入playoff,
还有什么可伤心的，
你让oriles和dodgers的球迷怎么办？ |
|
o**e
发帖数: 22 | 20 今年Braves的比赛, 除了第一场下午比的没看,
其他都看了, 现在11-11 比去年同时期好点
考虑Sheffield, Maddux,Marquis的伤病,
两场从AA调来投手,现在先发已经用了8个.
其中三场,MOSS, 忘了名字, 韩国人都是MLB处女投
这个结果算凑合吧,只是过程不让人满意.
棒子嘛, 从来就是这样, 也不指望他们能
能有惊人之作.
Andrew最近还不错, Chipper也渐有起色,
只是Javy Loppez,和Franco实在不在状态
尤其是Franco,去年结束前多牛啊,
现在就会DP,帮敌人的忙.现在一看他
蹶着屁股挥棒的样子,我就烦.真不明白
Cox上几场还把他放在Chipper后面,
结果对Marlins那场, 搞了两个DP.
昨天对DBacks,如果还是他, 肯定又没戏了.
现在最大的问题还是防守,
Braves的经典就是考投手和防守控制敌人得个2,3分
然后靠Chipper, Andrew, Brian,Homer,搞个3,4分.
现在 picther还行了,
牛棚也不错,除了被Mets第九局打暴那场,
问题是防守不行.
Furcal实在是 |
|
B*****R
发帖数: 1539 | 21 or almost beat them in playoffs in previous year.
they bot Jeff Nelson and Tino from Mariners after 1995
they bot J.Giambi from A's after 2001
they bot Justice in 2000 maybe still in rememberance of 1997?
they can't buy anybody from 2001 DBacks, but they still rob Wells from them in
offseason
now, it looks like Glause, Salmon, Anderson of Angles are on their list... |
|
s*****t
发帖数: 19 | 22
Well, I still DBacks is a typical nl stype team with good pitch and good
defence. In general, nl is better in pitching, defence and running than al. In
2001, dbox had two players that bunt often(womack and counsel) and some good
defenders like grace, matt williams, counsel and Steve Finley. Most of their
players run bases well. no need to mention their pitchers. Bob Brendly (and
other nl coachs) really doesn't like players who can play long balls but are
not reliable defensively. That's the re |
|
s****r
发帖数: 5546 | 23 Angles over Sox
Indians over Yanks
Cubs over DBacks
Rox over Philly |
|
Q******g
发帖数: 607 | 24 my prediction will be exactly opposite, hehe
AL:
RSox over LAA
NYY over Indians
NL:
DBacks over Cubs, poor Cubs, I wish they can win them all
Philly over Rox, forget about "momentum", look at last year's Cards. |
|
t****e
发帖数: 283 | 25 AL:
Sox over Angles
Indians over Yanks
Indians over Yanks
NL:
Cubs over DBacks
Rox over Philly
Cubs over Rox
Indians over Cubs
If it is true, I will fa baozi, hehe |
|
m********y
发帖数: 3408 | 26 AL WS
3:1
Cleveland - Yankees ---- Yankees 4:3
3:1 ----- Yankees
RedSox - Angels ----- Angels
4:2
----------- Yankees
NL
3:2
DBacks - Cubs ---------- Cubs 4:2
3:1 ---- |
|
n**o
发帖数: 10 | 27 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:2)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> RedSox (4:3)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> Cubs (3:2)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:1)
NLCS:
Cubs ---- phillies -----> Phillies (4:2)
WS
RedSox -- Phillies ----> RedSox (4:2)
|
|
G*******s
发帖数: 265 | 28 AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:1)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> RedSox (4:3)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> Cubs (3:2)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:2)
NLCS:
Cubs ---- Phillies -----> Phillies (4:2)
WS
RedSox -- Phillies ----> RedSox (4:1)
|
|
C******r
发帖数: 282 | 29 俺来一个俗不可耐版的。
AL
Cleveland - Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox - Yankees ----> Yankees (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> Cubs (3:2)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Phillies (3:0)
NLCS:
Cubs ---- Phillies -----> Phillies (4:3)
WS
Yankees -- Phillies ----> Yankees (4:1)
|
|
I********L
发帖数: 1339 | 30 ALDS
Cleveland / Yankees ---> Yankees (3:2)
RedSox / Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox / Yankees ----> RedSox (4:2)
NLDS
DBacks / Cubs ----------> Cubs (3:2)
Phillies / Rockies -------> Phillies (3:0)
NLCS:
Cubs / Phillies -----> Cubs (4:3)
WS
RedSox // Cubs ----> RedSox (4:1)
|
|
t****e
发帖数: 283 | 31 AL
Indians - Yankees ---> Indians (3:2)
RedSox - Angels -----> RedSox (3:1)
ALCS:
RedSox - Indians ----> Indians (4:2)
NL
DBacks - Cubs ----------> Cubs (3:1)
Phillies - Rockies -------> Rockies (3:1)
NLCS:
Cubs ---- Rockies -----> Cubs (4:2)
WS
Indians -- Cubs ----> Indians (4:2)
|
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 32 GRE逻辑啊，那是因为大部分情况下休息6天的队本身实力就一览众山小。Rox收市
DBacks这种菜队不能证明一览众山小。 |
|
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 34 偶说过，Phillies和DBacks俩残废队 |
|
w*****n
发帖数: 937 | 35 wow, 6 for 1,
don't know much about the Dbacks farm system.
But their rotation with Webb/Haren on the top, wow. |
|
t********t
发帖数: 5415 | 36 有cc，外卡没问题。转会之后已经交给酿酒8-0的成绩了，ERA2.99，而且8场CG和博士
一起领先联盟。dbacks感觉后劲不足，道奇圈人我觉得完全是临时抱佛脚，manny热了
一下之后开始回归正常了（08年的正常），据说还要圈老马...和国联东区倒是真的有
一拼。 |
|
t********t
发帖数: 5415 | 37 他应该不会搞到最后一次吧？怎么说也有在dback的传奇和拯救boston的经历...
PS：他应该和maddog同年投票吧？那第一轮可能悬。 |
|
A**d
发帖数: 13310 | 38 blowout what? You idiot. You can't even remember who blew out
whom when Rockies faced the so-called topdog Phillies and DBacks.
And fuck off about regular season rp. |
|
b********n
发帖数: 4256 | 39
qwyu 赌 red sox, 唐门赌DBACKS。
赌输赢，赔率 1 ：10
怎么样啊？ |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 40 The WS btw Yanks and Dbacks in 2001 is still the most exciting series to me
... guess I am really getting old ... |
|
s****r
发帖数: 5546 | 41 I think Kim was just unlucky. And DBacks didn't really have another option,
while Washington totally squandered his bullpen. |
|
|
|
x*********s
发帖数: 195 | 44 好奇你怎么得出的“NL总是这么烂“的结论
自养鸡王朝后
21世纪13个WS国联拿下7个
01 Dbacks
03 Marlins
06 Cardinals
08 Phillies
10 Giants
11 Cardinals
12 Giants |
|
n*******e
发帖数: 2213 | 45 to make one more point about it,
Pedro, Unit, Maddux are clearly the best among the bunch. Way better than
everyone else. The same thing can be said about Roger Clemens but his
candidacy is tainted by PED.
Now, it comes to this quesiton, 3 other pitchers, Smoltz, Mussina, Schilling
, who's better? One can argue that Smoltz is the best because he has a Cy
Young and he's got all those saves. Schilling had a few really dominant
years with both Dbacks and RedSox and has a better career ERA+ than Smo... 阅读全帖 |
|
J***o
发帖数: 7166 | 46 我只是想转移话题让大家不要再骂猪头小队长了包括我自己lol 我觉得没有比这个deal
更佳疯狂无脑的了 他32岁拿个合同 dback是有多脑残 |
|
t***a
发帖数: 7982 | 47 响应多米，来一篇
对各队一提到名字，我对他们的第一反应
NYY 马路边里的皇家马戏团
Redsox 超级大逆转
Rays 改名有用么？
Orioles 铁人的球队
Blue Jays 大家拿
Twins 桑塔纳
Indians A3队能行么
Royals 总算又拿了个
Tigers 干掉养鸡然后去猥琐赛拉稀
Whitesox 偷个不死三振，跟着红袜一起破魔咒
LAA 猴子,和K-rod 的投球动作真搭!
A's 绿帽子
Mariners 混吃等死
Rangers 混日子
Astros 擦，啥时候从国联跑过来了?
Marlins 牛逼新队
Braves 三赛扬一猥琐王，真的挺猥琐
NYM 黑洞，桑塔纳也掉里面了
Phillies， 光有cliff lee是搞不定养鸡的，你看人家D'Backs
Nats， 打酱油这么久了，能翻身么
Reds 唯一去现场看过比赛的，球票好便宜，哈哈
pirates 请吸取港人rp爆发
Cubs Billy goats curse(BTW怎么就被破了呢）
Brewers 酿酒咋变香肠了？
Cards，木匠，普猴子。奇迹般的06赛季
DBacks 和马林鱼都是... 阅读全帖 |
|
c**c
发帖数: 2593 | 48 嗯，想起当年Braves主场被DBacks的Randy Johnson投了个perfect game，那天俺正好
洗衣服，在洗衣店里跟一老黑一起目瞪口呆地看着电视，看到最后一局，可以看出来连
亚特兰大主场观众都在为Randy Johnson每一个球欢呼了。。。当然也可能是在给
Braves的打手喝倒彩。。。一晃也快十年了。 |
|
s*******y
发帖数: 46535 | 49 蒋老师所做的工作是对我们的帮助，也是对我们的鞭策！
Mr. Jiang's work has been both great help and challenge to us!
蒋老师和当地其他老师大张旗鼓地发奖
High Profile Award Ceremony by Mr. Jiang and Other Teachers
通过反馈改进编辑质量
Improving quality of edit with feedbacks
从反馈中我们整理了学生对各篇文章的评价，以及对一些开放性问题的回答，对于编辑
们了解学生的需求很有帮助。比如学生回答中普遍反映学习英语难，北美义工不惜连续
撰稿，把自己的经验向读者分享。又比如学生回答中又提到各种各样的健康问题，如何
预防肿瘤，什么是艾滋病等等，医学专业的义工Yunyue 便耐心又认真地搜集资料并一一
介绍。从反馈中发现，学生对当下发生的重大事件很感兴趣，于是我们会选择一些热点
现象深入介绍，比如介绍世博会等。 篇幅所限，11 和12 期反馈的更详细统计资料见h
ttp://bbs.ocef.net/bbs/cgi-bin/forums.c... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****n
发帖数: 2174 | 50 I feel the same way, too.
Roughly 50% of things I have learning at work are from collaboration and fee
dbacks from others. Also, the company often hold workshops or talks where pe
ople share their valuable experience with each other. I learned a lot of R s
tuff from a few very experience R collaborators in the company. Some key tri
cks may take me years to know without these knowledge sharing.
.
feedback
you |
|
