P******0 发帖数: 9787 | 1 南京军区装甲二师86A型步战车车载红箭-73C导弹发射 |
|
|
o****o 发帖数: 8077 | 3 红箭73C还是不错的
反坦克导弹这个东西,引导头改进对综合性能的边际提升还是很大的 |
|
R****a 发帖数: 6858 | 4 人车混和空投:中国ZBD2000轻型履带式步兵战车/伞兵战车
2005年,我军ZBD2000型轻型履带式步兵战车/伞兵战车正式在各种媒体露面。据称该
车是在引进研究苏联/俄罗斯BMD-3伞兵战车的基础上自行改进研制而成的,采用了与俄
罗斯战车完全不同的发动机前置布局。装有一座带30mm机炮的单人炮塔。装有一台红箭
73反坦克导弹发射器,可使用新型串联战斗部导弹。但众多部件与细节极为相近。两侧
设有射击孔,可能可载步兵6~7人。全重预计为12吨,一架伊尔-76大型运输机可运送
三辆。
为了尽可能提高防护力,该车看来在车体结构下功夫,如其外形低矮、流线型好,材料
选用的可能是特种合金钢板或特种铝合金板,另外该车首倾斜装甲的倾斜角度较大,因
此有很好的防弹外形。为了让这款新伞兵步兵战车更好的适应未来作战环境
, 卑人认为,还必须加强其防护能力。我国已经有先进的FY系列爆炸反应装甲,在战
前将其移植到车上,技术难度上应该不大,但就怕造成单车超重。一架伊尔 -76只能运
2辆了,该车还是一种动力前置的超轻型履带式伞兵步战车,发动机位于车体前部右侧
,在发动机的上部,有1个动力舱盖板,变于维修更换... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*m 发帖数: 1114 | 5 刚才run了10分钟orthos cpu loader, 基本温度在73C和74C之间,最后稳定在73C。 |
|
|
d***y 发帖数: 8536 | 7 我一直觉得外挂的导弹,安全性有问题。不知道是如何解决的。 |
|
P******0 发帖数: 9787 | 8 差不多吧,TOW的射程略大点,5千米,红箭73C4千米。 |
|
|
g*q 发帖数: 26623 | 10 今天的lean hog是51c/磅,折合人民币3.8元/斤,根本不是什么2.5元
而且明年8月的期货是73c,相当于5.6人民币/斤 |
|
s***c 发帖数: 1926 | 11 超大上看到,共军自己打印军地堡准备用红箭73c,红箭8打地堡实在太奢侈了。
叙利亚叛军用标枪打地堡垒,美军看了都心疼。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c****2 发帖数: 345 | 18 在最近收到的quarterly report上有一份usaa funds performance的列表。
这个usagx 一年的回报是34.8% ( 3/31/2010 - 3/31/2011). 但从google图表上
这段时间的价钱应该是20%,dividend 有73c.打电话去usaa问他们也说不出个原因。
是否有骗人的嫌疑?可以向哪里投诉? |
|
m****u 发帖数: 229 | 19 ccwmh2,
I think their report may be correct.
How much dividend did u get on Dec 9, 2010 and Dec 20, 2010?
Are the two combined = the 73c u said?
I somehow remember that they sent out a huge dividend, i.e. 10% or more in
the end of 2010. |
|
f****n 发帖数: 3036 | 20 1. Gross margin declined to 21%. Huge write off.
2. (cost per watt reduced by 2 cents to 73c per watt. ) Is this a JOKE?
Leading chinese PV manufactures reduced module cost by at least 25%-30%
through last year. Soon we will see PV module cost lower than thin film cost
per watt. At the same time, PV module remains much higher effiency (16%-18%
) vs. thin film (12%-13% for FSLR)
3. diminishing CFO: $11 mm CF from operations vs. $203 mm in Q3.
I must say it's a very ugly ER. Would have shorted thi... 阅读全帖 |
|
n******n 发帖数: 12088 | 21 6-person table, 1/2 NL cash game, buy-in 200.
hand 1:
stack 150, button 94o. BB and button -1 conservative. SB, BB+1 and BB+2
aggressive.
No one raise but I fold. Then flop 9, 7, 4, turn 9, river 4, no flush draw.
So I fold a full house.
hand 2:
stack 250, button-1 73c. Limped in, but fold when SB raise to 7. Flop 3, 7,
A, turn 7, river doesn't matter. So I fold another full house.
Consider my stack, the # of players, and my position, am I too conservative?
虽然这两个满房很偶然,不过我希望管中窥豹,修正自己的风格。 |
|
n******n 发帖数: 12088 | 22 6-person table, 1/2 NL cash game, buy-in 200.
hand 1:
stack 150, button 94o. BB and button -1 conservative. SB, BB+1 and BB+2
aggressive.
No one raise but I fold. Then flop 9, 7, 4, turn 9, river 4, no flush draw.
So I fold a full house.
hand 2:
stack 250, button-1 73c. Limped in, but fold when SB raise to 7. Flop 3, 7,
A, turn 7, river doesn't matter. So I fold another full house.
Consider my stack, the # of players, and my position, am I too conservative?
虽然这两个满房很偶然,不过我希望管中窥豹,修正自己的风格。 |
|