由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: 47682
(共0页)
q*a
发帖数: 2330
1
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jianglai (Veni, Vidi, Vici.) 于 (Thu Aug 2 02:54:30 2012, 美东) 提到:
http://www.nature.com/news/why-great-olympic-feats-raise-suspic
英帝堕落到什么地步了。。。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.3.1
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
daye520 (哈哈) 于 (Thu Aug 2 02:56:00 2012, 美东) 提到:
罗切特每次都被拿出来做背景。

☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
michaelxiaga (南京中山陵) 于 (Thu Aug 2 02:58:53 2012, 美东) 提到:
回复里面有一个哥们写的不错
其实咱们在这里说有啥用, 就得用英文反驳white trash
☆─────────────────... 阅读全帖
L**********r
发帖数: 143
2
来自主题: Biology版 - 不能发Nature了
Who wrote this? It is so funny
2012-08-02 01:34 AM
Report this comment | #47682
Publishing in Science said:
Why you guys are so surprised to see such an article in Nature? Compared
to Cell and Science, it is obvious that the Nature Editors are easily
fooled and manipulated. Now we could tease those published in Nature with
one more joke: Are your results based on scientific evidence or "Performance
profiling"?
(共0页)